culinary vs. botanical fruit classification
concept / concept-culinary-vs-botanical-fruit-classification
料理上の果物と植物学上の果実の区別
↑Short definition
The mismatch between botanical classification and the agricultural-statistical and culinary treatment of crops that are botanically fruit but classified as vegetables because they are grown as annual herbaceous crops. The Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries distinguishes 「果菜類」 (in translation: "fruiting vegetables"), including tomatoes and cucumbers, from 「果実的野菜」 (in translation: "fruit-like vegetables"), including melons, strawberries, and watermelons.
A reader-facing overview for this entry is in preparation. What has been checked, and its sources, can be followed from the claim cards below.
Structured claims — open a section to read each claim's confidence, evidence and limits
Composition and content (1)
Scope: The Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries explanation of vegetable categories in its 「消費者の部屋」 (in translation: "Consumer Room").
Show data
concept-culinary-vs-botanical-fruit-classification —is_defined_as→ "The Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries says 「概ね2年以上栽培する草本植物及び木本植物で、果実を食用とするものを『果樹』として取り扱って」 (in translation: "herbaceous and woody plants cultivated for roughly 2 years or longer whose fruit is eaten are treated as fruit trees"). Crops grown as annual herbs for their fruit are therefore classified as vegetables even though botanically they are fruits. The page lists cucumbers, tomatoes, eggplants, peppers, and pumpkins separately as 「果菜類」 (in translation: "fruiting vegetables"), and melons, strawberries, and watermelons as 「果実的野菜」 (in translation: "fruit-like vegetables"). Chestnuts and Japanese plums are treated as fruit trees because they are perennial woody plants."