日本語版

Research note 057 — 2026-09-16

When lettuce tastes bitter, does dressing change it?

You take a bite of lettuce and it is more bitter than expected. Does dressing change how it tastes? In a conference abstract that directly includes lettuce, adding a developed dressing weakened bitterness in a sensory evaluation by people. A seasoning that includes vinegar is a candidate worth trying.

On this page (7 sections)
  1. What this page shows
  2. First, how people tasted lettuce
  3. The vinegar result was measured by instrument, not by people
  4. What a small endive trial shows
  5. How far this goes in the kitchen
  6. Frequently asked
  7. What is not known
↑

What this page shows

First, how people tasted lettuce

A 2021 conference abstract added a developed dressing to lettuce, tomato, cabbage, and broccoli, and compared bitterness, astringency, and a green, grassy smell. Alongside instrumental measurement, it also ran a sensory evaluation in which people tasted the vegetables with and without the dressing, and records that this sensation weakened. Of the four vegetables, the effect was largest for lettuce.

lettuce — perceived bitterness is suppressed by: Addition of a developed dressing. The conference abstract states that sensory evaluation of lettuce, tomato, cabbage, and broccoli found bitterness, astringency, and green/grassy off-flavor were reduced, with the greatest effect seen in lettuce.preliminary

Scope: A 2021 conference abstract by an author affiliated with Kewpie. Sensory evaluation of 4 vegetables, including lettuce, with and without dressing.

Note: The number of evaluators, cultivar/part, formulation, amount added, scale, and statistical values are not given in the abstract. Reproducibility with an arbitrary commercial dressing and the appropriate amount for home use have not been tested.

Sensory evaluation of the 4 target vegetables with and without dressing found bitterness, astringency, and green/grassy off-flavor were reduced, with the greatest effect seen in lettuce, as stated in the abstract.
Limitations: Conference abstract only. The number of evaluators, cultivar/part, formulation, amount added, scale, statistical values, and blinding/presentation order are not given.
Source: ドレッシングによる野菜の苦味、渋味、青臭さへの低減効果 (松本 諒平; 田村 佳子; 岡本 幸子; 熊谷 信介; 栁澤 琢也, 2021) · full text checked
Show dataingredient-lettuce —has_perceived_bitterness_suppressed_by→ "Addition of a developed dressing. The conference abstract states that sensory evaluation of lettuce, tomato, cabbage, and broccoli found bitterness, astringency, and green/grassy off-flavor were reduced, with the greatest effect seen in lettuce."
claim: clm-lettuce-dressing-bitterness-reduced-abstract / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-16

This is direct evidence that "lettuce's bitterness can be affected by seasoning."

The vinegar result was measured by instrument, not by people

The same research added water to lettuce, crushed it, and filtered the result; egg yolk, cooking oil, vinegar, and carrot purée were then added separately to the filtrate. When compared on a taste sensor (an "electronic tongue"), the reduction in bitterness was particularly large for vinegar.

lettuce — electronic-tongue bitterness response was reduced by: Vinegar. In a taste-sensor evaluation where dressing ingredients were added individually to a lettuce filtrate, the bitterness-reducing effect was especially high for vinegar.preliminary

Scope: Individual addition of egg yolk, cooking oil, vinegar, and carrot purée to a filtrate made by crushing lettuce with water and filtering it, with instrumental evaluation.

Note: This is not a comparison of a person tasting lettuce with vinegar poured on it. Ingredient concentration, cultivar, part, numerical values, and statistical values are not given in the abstract.

The abstract states that adding each ingredient separately to the lettuce filtrate showed a reducing effect for every ingredient, and that for bitterness the effect of vinegar was especially high.
Limitations: This is not a test in which a person tastes the food. Numerical values, statistical values, and addition concentration are not given in the abstract.
Source: ドレッシングによる野菜の苦味、渋味、青臭さへの低減効果 (松本 諒平; 田村 佳子; 岡本 幸子; 熊谷 信介; 栁澤 琢也, 2021) · full text checked
Show dataingredient-lettuce —has_e_tongue_bitterness_reduced_by→ "Vinegar. In a taste-sensor evaluation where dressing ingredients were added individually to a lettuce filtrate, the bitterness-reducing effect was especially high for vinegar."
claim: clm-lettuce-vinegar-instrumental-bitterness-reduced-abstract / type: processing / updated: 2026-09-16

An important boundary sits here. What people tasted was the vegetable with a developed dressing added; people did not compare lettuce with only vinegar added. It cannot be read as "vinegar alone makes it just as easy to eat" or "the balance with sourness also improves." Vinegar is a clue for thinking about the mechanism, not a finished household procedure.

ComparisonSubjectWhat can be read directly
Developed dressing, present or absentPeople evaluating four vegetables including lettuceBitterness, astringency, and a grassy smell weakened, with the largest effect for lettuce
Ingredients added one at a timeInstrument evaluating filtered lettuceThe reduction in bitterness was particularly large for vinegar

What a small endive trial shows

A different paper uses endive rather than lettuce. When six people ate leaves harvested that day, all six chose "not much felt at first, but bitterness comes out while chewing." When an acidic, commercially available non-oil shiso dressing was added, all six people chose "the bitterness becomes weaker." Because the direct subject of tasting is different, this cannot be counted as a repeat trial of the lettuce result.

curly endive — perceived bitterness is suppressed by: An acidic commercial non-oil shiso dressing. In a sensory test of endive with 6 panelists, everyone chose the option that the dressing made the bitterness feel weaker.supported

Scope: A sensory test with 6 panelists using endive leaves harvested that day and a commercial non-oil shiso dressing.

Note: A single product, 6 panelists, a fixed comparison order; no mention of blinding or randomization. This is not a direct sensory test of lettuce.

When eaten plain, all 6 panelists chose the option that bitterness came out during chewing, and when the dressing was used, all 6 answered that the bitterness became weaker.
Limitations: Small-scale, with no mention of blinding, randomization, repetition, or alternating the comparison order. The direct sensory target is not lettuce.
Source: ドレッシングの使用がキク科野菜の苦味を緩和する (堀江 秀樹, 2011) · full text checked
Show dataingredient-endive —has_perceived_bitterness_suppressed_by→ "An acidic commercial non-oil shiso dressing. In a sensory test of endive with 6 panelists, everyone chose the option that the dressing made the bitterness feel weaker."
claim: clm-endive-acidic-dressing-bitterness-reduced / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-16

Why it weakens: acid suppresses bitterness forming in the mouth

The core of the endive paper is not the six-person tasting but the measurement of the reason. The latex of endive and lettuce leaves is rich in lactucopicrin 15-oxalate, which is only weakly bitter; strongly bitter lactucopicrin makes up less than 1% of the two combined (endive 0.9%, lettuce 0.6%). Yet when 8 g of leaves were chewed for 30 seconds with water, the strongly bitter form had risen to 45.5% of the total. While chewing and mixing with saliva, the strongly bitter compound is produced from the weakly bitter one. All six people choosing "bitterness comes out while chewing" and this number point to the same phenomenon.

curly endive — bitterness is generated by: That the strongly bitter lactucopicrin (L) forms from the weakly bitter lactucopicrin 15-oxalate (LO) in the latex as it mixes with saliva during chewing. In chewed material made by pouring 3 mL of water over 8 g of leaves and chewing for 30 seconds (about 60 chews), the proportion of L in the L+LO total reached 45.5% (LO 13.3 μM, L 11.0 μM). In the latex itself, L is only 0.9% of the totalsupported

Scope: Horie 2011, Tables 1 and 2. Leaves of endive (Takii Seed) harvested that day. For the chewed material, concentrations in the juice pressed out with a garlic press, n=4

Note: That L forms from LO under neutral to weakly alkaline conditions and is suppressed under weakly acidic conditions was confirmed by buffer extraction (proportion of L 1% or less, 4%, and 9% at pH 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5). The 45.5% seen after chewing cannot be explained by pH alone, and the authors note that the involvement of inorganic ions, enzymes, and microorganisms in saliva remains a topic for future work.

In endive chewed material made by pouring water on and chewing for 30 seconds, LO was 13.3 μM and L was 11.0 μM, with the L proportion at 45.5%. In the latex, the L proportion was 0.9% (LO 143.2 mM, L 1.3 mM). The authors infer that as it was mixed with saliva during chewing, the strongly bitter L formed from the weakly bitter LO.
Limitations: The number of people who did the chewing is not given (n=4 is the number of analytical replicates). The high proportion of L after chewing cannot be explained by pH alone, and the authors note that the involvement of inorganic ions, enzymes, and microorganisms in saliva remains unresolved.
Source: ドレッシングの使用がキク科野菜の苦味を緩和する (堀江 秀樹, 2011) · full text checked
Show dataingredient-endive —has_bitterness_generated_by→ "That the strongly bitter lactucopicrin (L) forms from the weakly bitter lactucopicrin 15-oxalate (LO) in the latex as it mixes with saliva during chewing. In chewed material made by pouring 3 mL of water over 8 g of leaves and chewing for 30 seconds (about 60 chews), the proportion of L in the L+LO total reached 45.5% (LO 13.3 μM, L 11.0 μM). In the latex itself, L is only 0.9% of the total"
claim: clm-w176-endive-chewing-generates-lactucopicrin / type: mechanism / updated: 2026-09-26

Chewed with an acidic non-oil shiso dressing (pH 3.8), the strongly bitter form stayed at 3.9%. The chewed mixture had a pH of 4.6–5.0, and leaves dipped for 3 seconds in 5% acetic acid were kept low in the same way. Buffer extractions showed the same direction: 1% or less at pH 5.5, 4% at 6.5 and 9% at 7.5, so the strongly bitter compound forms under neutral to weakly alkaline conditions and its formation is suppressed under weakly acidic conditions. The authors conclude that what the dressing does is not to mask bitterness but to suppress the formation of the strongly bitter compound in the mouth. Because oil might mask bitterness, an oil-free dressing was chosen for this experiment.

curly endive has debittering most likely due to That the dressing's acid suppresses the formation of lactucopicrin (L) during chewing. In chewed material made by pouring 3 mL of a commercial non-oil shiso (perilla) dressing (pH 3.8) and chewing for 30 seconds, the proportion of L in the L+LO total stayed at 3.9% (LO 22.4 μM, L 0.9 μM), and the pH of the chewed material was 4.6–5.0. Leaves dipped for 3 seconds in 5% acetic acid also kept the proportion of L suppressed lowsupported

Scope: Horie 2011, Table 2 and the main text. A comparison with the water control chewed at 45.5%, n=4. A non-oil dressing was used to avoid the possibility that fat would mask the bitterness

In chewed material with shiso (perilla) dressing poured on, LO was 22.4 μM and L was 0.9 μM, with the L proportion at 3.9% (versus 45.5% for the water control). The pH of the chewed material was 4.6–5.0. The main text also states that leaves dipped for 3 seconds in 5% acetic acid kept the proportion of L suppressed low. The authors conclude that the effect of the dressing's acid suppressed the formation of L, and the bitterness was reduced.
Limitations: A single dressing product. Numerical values for the 5% acetic acid dip are not given in the main text. This was not done for lettuce.
Source: ドレッシングの使用がキク科野菜の苦味を緩和する (堀江 秀樹, 2011) · full text checked
Show dataingredient-endive —has_debittering_most_likely_due_to→ "That the dressing's acid suppresses the formation of lactucopicrin (L) during chewing. In chewed material made by pouring 3 mL of a commercial non-oil shiso (perilla) dressing (pH 3.8) and chewing for 30 seconds, the proportion of L in the L+LO total stayed at 3.9% (LO 22.4 μM, L 0.9 μM), and the pH of the chewed material was 4.6–5.0. Leaves dipped for 3 seconds in 5% acetic acid also kept the proportion of L suppressed low"
claim: clm-w176-endive-dressing-acid-suppresses-lactucopicrin-formation / type: mechanism / updated: 2026-09-26
lactucopicrin is derived from Breakdown of lactucopicrin 15-oxalate (LO). When endive leaves were blended and extracted in buffers at pH 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5, the proportion of L in the L+LO total was 1% or less, 4%, and 9%; at pH 7.5, LO decreased and L increased over time after extraction. L forms under neutral to weakly alkaline conditions, and that formation is suppressed under weakly acidic conditionssupported

Scope: Horie 2011, Figure 1. Endive leaves blended and extracted for 3 minutes with 9 times their weight of 0.1 M phosphate buffer, n=3

Note: When the latex of lettuce and endive is analyzed quickly, L is 1% or less of the total (endive 0.9%, lettuce 0.6%), and the authors caution that L can also form from LO during sample preparation for analysis.

The proportion of L (L/(L+LO)) in the extracts obtained with buffers at pH 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5 was 1% or less, 4%, and 9%. At pH 7.5, a decrease in LO and an increase in L were observed over time after extraction, suggesting that the formation of L from LO is promoted under weakly alkaline conditions.
Limitations: This is a result in buffer, and does not include oral conditions (temperature, saliva components).
Source: ドレッシングの使用がキク科野菜の苦味を緩和する (堀江 秀樹, 2011) · full text checked
Show datacompound-lactucopicrin —is_derived_from→ "Breakdown of lactucopicrin 15-oxalate (LO). When endive leaves were blended and extracted in buffers at pH 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5, the proportion of L in the L+LO total was 1% or less, 4%, and 9%; at pH 7.5, LO decreased and L increased over time after extraction. L forms under neutral to weakly alkaline conditions, and that formation is suppressed under weakly acidic conditions"
claim: clm-w176-lactucopicrin-formed-from-oxalate-ph-dependent / type: mechanism / updated: 2026-09-26

For lettuce, the measurement goes only as far as showing that the latex has the same composition; no chewing test or sensory test was run on lettuce itself. The authors write only that they expect lettuce to be alleviated by the same mechanism. This agrees in direction with the conference abstract, where vinegar had the largest instrumental effect.

lettuce — perceived bitterness is suppressed by: The dressing's acid (the authors' inference). The latex of lettuce (cultivar Berkeley) also contains the same lactucopicrin 15-oxalate (LO) and lactucopicrin (L) as endive, and L is only 0.6% of the total. As with endive, it is expected that the dressing's acid suppresses the formation of L that occurs as it mixes with saliva during chewing, and that the bitterness is thereby reduced. No test measured from actually chewing lettuce itself, and no sensory test, has been carried outpreliminary

Scope: Horie 2011, Table 1 and the discussion. Lettuce grown in a vinyl greenhouse in Tsu City, Mie Prefecture, and analyzed on the day of harvest

Note: For lettuce, only the composition of the latex (Table 1) was measured; the reducing effect is the authors' expectation. This is consistent in direction with the conference abstract (Matsumoto et al. 2021)'s instrumental measurement finding that vinegar's bitterness-reducing effect was especially large.

The latex of lettuce (Berkeley) had LO at 31.3 mM and L at 0.2 mM, an L proportion of 0.6% (versus 0.9% for endive). The authors write that because lettuce's latex also contains only a small amount of L, lettuce's bitterness, like endive's, is expected to be reduced by the dressing's acid.
Limitations: No chewing test or sensory test was carried out on lettuce, and the reducing effect is the authors' expectation. The paper cites an earlier report as having shown that rinsing off the latex leads to reduced bitterness (no figures are given in this paper).
Source: ドレッシングの使用がキク科野菜の苦味を緩和する (堀江 秀樹, 2011) · full text checked
Show dataingredient-lettuce —has_perceived_bitterness_suppressed_by→ "The dressing's acid (the authors' inference). The latex of lettuce (cultivar Berkeley) also contains the same lactucopicrin 15-oxalate (LO) and lactucopicrin (L) as endive, and L is only 0.6% of the total. As with endive, it is expected that the dressing's acid suppresses the formation of L that occurs as it mixes with saliva during chewing, and that the bitterness is thereby reduced. No test measured from actually chewing lettuce itself, and no sensory test, has been carried out"
claim: clm-w176-lettuce-dressing-acid-expected / type: mechanism / updated: 2026-09-26

How far this goes in the kitchen

If the material available so far is turned into a starting point for the kitchen, there is room to compare, on your own plate, eating bitter lettuce as it is against pairing it with a dressing that includes vinegar. This is not a procedure that promises the same result as the research, but a way of trying it that the material makes available.

Start with a small amount on a separate leaf, and choose whichever you find easier to eat, taking into account not only bitterness but also sourness and aroma. What the research shows as "weakens" and what becomes "a matter of taste" as cooking are separate answers.

One thing follows from the mechanism. The acid works when it is present in the mouth while you chew. In the endive experiment the leaves were chewed immediately after the dressing was added. Adding a vinegar-based dressing just before eating, or chewing together with something sour, fits this mechanism. Whether an oil-only dressing would act the same way was not examined in this study (there was no oil-only control).

Frequently asked

Is it enough to just add vinegar?

The vinegar result comes from measuring filtered lettuce with a taste sensor. It is not a result from people eating lettuce with only vinegar added and comparing how much they liked it. The overall taste, including sourness, needs to be checked on your own plate.

Does washing with water remove the bitterness?

The lettuce research adopted here is not a trial in which people compared washing with water against not washing. Washing time or how the leaves are cut cannot be specified as a procedure for reducing bitterness.

What is not known

Related: lettuce / endive
Related topic hub: Bitterness, Astringency, and Egumi
Related research notes: Kitchen Prep, Read Through Measured Bitterness / Does any seasoning remove bitterness? — Sugar and salt
Source ledger: the source ledger

How to cite this page

Aoki, M. (NIGAMI LAB) (2026). When lettuce tastes bitter, does dressing change it?. https://nigamilab.com/en/notes/lettuce-dressing/

Each claim card has a stable anchor (#clm-…). The dataset is CC BY 4.0; see the data page. Dataset DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22739101