日本語版

almond

ingredient / ingredient-almond

アーモンド / Prunus dulcis

Almond is a nut eaten as a dried seed. Roasting temperature and time alter aroma compounds, taste qualities (including bitterness, astringency, and burnt flavor), and palatability.

On this page (5 sections)
  1. Overview
  2. Sources for this overview (2)
  3. Topic hubs
  4. Related entries (5)
  5. Sensory (5)
↑

Reading the bitterness

Almonds show different degrees of bitterness by cultivar even under the same processing. In a trial in which a trained panel of 12 rated 6 cultivars harvested in Portugal in 2019 on a 1-5 point scale, raw samples showed cultivar differences in both bitterness and bitter-almond flavor, and these were strongest in Molar and Pegarinhos. Samples of unpeeled kernels roasted at 138°C for 33 minutes also showed cultivar differences in both attributes, and these were strongest in Pegarinhos and Refêgo.

In another treatment from the same study, kernels were dipped in boiling water for 30 seconds, the skin was removed by hand, and after air-drying at room temperature they were roasted at 138°C for 33 minutes. Comparing the 6 cultivars, the only sensory attributes showing a cultivar difference were the hardness of the first bite and the force needed to crush the kernel. This is not a direct comparison showing that bitterness fell relative to before processing; it only shows that, within this blanched-and-roasted sample, bitterness did not distinguish the cultivars.

There is also a trial comparing irrigation regimes during cultivation. A trained panel of 10 rated the 'Vairo' cultivar, harvested in 2017 from a single orchard in Spain, 3 times each on a 0-10 point scale. Across the 4 irrigation conditions, bitterness ranged from 0.5 to 0.6 and astringency from 0.5 to 0.7, with no significant difference in either. This is a single-cultivar, single-year result, and it cannot be generalized to say that irrigation has no effect on almond bitterness.

Sources for this overview

  1. Effects of Different Processing Treatments on Almond (Prunus dulcis) Bioactive Compounds, Antioxidant Activities, Fatty Acids, and Sensorial Characteristics

    Ivo Oliveira; Anne S. Meyer; Sílvia Afonso; Alex Sequeira; Alice Vilela; Piebiep Goufo; Henrique Trindade; Berta Gonçalves / 2020 / journal article / full text checked

    Checked for this overview: Supports the result that, across 6 cultivars, in raw samples, a trained panel of 12 rated on a 1-5 point scale, bitterness and bitter-almond flavor were strongest in Molar and Pegarinhos / Supports the result that, for the same 6 cultivars roasted unpeeled at 138°C for 33 minutes, bitterness and bitter-almond flavor were strongest in Pegarinhos and Refêgo / Supports, for 30 seconds in boiling water, skin removal, room-temperature drying, and roasting at 138°C for 33 minutes, the result that within-group cultivar differences were limited to the 2 hardness attributes, and the limitation that this is not a between-treatment comparison

  2. Sensory Profile and Acceptability of HydroSOStainable Almonds

    Leontina Lipan; Marina Cano-Lamadrid; Mireia Corell; Esther Sendra; Francisca Hernández; Laura Stan; Dan Cristian Vodnar; Laura Vázquez-Araújo; Ángel A. Carbonell-Barrachina / 2019 / journal article / full text checked

    Checked for this overview: Supports, for a single orchard, a single year, and the 'Vairo' cultivar, with a trained panel of 10 rating each sample 3 times on a 0-10 point scale, bitterness of 0.5-0.6 and astringency of 0.5-0.7 with no significant difference, and the limitation that this cannot be generalized

Structured claims — open a section to read each claim's confidence, evidence and limits

Sensory (5)

almond — perceived bitterness is affected by: Roasting temperature (150-190°C)preliminary

Scope: Layer: food. Spanish 'Vairo' almonds grown under regulated deficit irrigation, roasted in a convection oven. 35 volatile compounds (GC analysis), a descriptive sensory profile, and a consumer preference test.

Note: Based on an abstract quotation via a search engine and Europe PMC (the full text was not confirmed on either Wiley or PubMed, both blocked with a 403). Roasting at 190°C is described as giving a deep color and burnt notes, 150°C as under-roasted, and 170°C for 10 minutes was concluded to be the optimum condition. Consumers' overall liking is reported to have shown a positive correlation with certain volatile compounds and with roasted/nutty sensory attributes, while showing a negative correlation with pyrazines, bitterness, astringency, woodiness, and burnt flavor. Statistical values (correlation coefficients, p-values) were not confirmed. An example of a roast-degree series for a nut (almond) other than coffee.

Quotation: “Almonds roasted at 190°C presented intense color and burnt notes, while almonds roasted at 150°C were under-roasted.” “consumers overall liking was positively linked to specific volatiles (alkanes, alcohols, aldehydes, and furans) and sensory attributes (sweetness, roasted, almond ID, nutty, hardness, and crispiness), but negatively correlated with pyrazines, bitterness, astringency, woody, and burnt flavor notes.” “roasting at 170°C for 10 min in a convective oven were the optimum conditions.”
Limitations: Based on a quotation obtained via a search engine and Europe PMC; the original paper's full text, statistical values (correlation coefficients, p-values), and panel size were not confirmed.
Source: Optimization of roasting conditions in hydroSOStainable almonds using volatile and descriptive sensory profiles and consumer acceptance (Lipan L; Cano-Lamadrid M; Vazquez-Araujo L; Lyczko J; Moriana A; Hernandez F; Garcia-Garcia E; Carbonell-Barrachina AA, 2020) · abstract checked
Show dataingredient-almond —has_perceived_bitterness_affected_by→ "Roasting temperature (150-190°C)"
claim: clm-w70b-almond-roasting-bitterness-burnt-liking / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-07
almond shows the sensory response Among 6 cultivars of raw almonds, bitterness and bitter-almond flavor differed by cultivar, and were strongest in Molar and Pegarinhossupported

Scope: 6 cultivars harvested in Portugal in 2019. A trained panel of 12 rated raw samples on a 1-5 point intensity scale

Note: This is a comparison among cultivars, not a bitterness ranking for edible almonds in general. The authors' speculation that this is due to benzaldehyde is not adopted here.

In raw samples, there were significant cultivar differences in skin color, bitter-almond flavor, and bitterness, and bitter-almond flavor and bitterness were most strongly associated with Molar and Pegarinhos. Figure 1A marks the relevant attributes as significant.
Limitations: This is a cultivar difference within raw samples. Numerical means appear only in a figure, not a table; this does not establish a chemical cause for the taste difference.
Source: Effects of Different Processing Treatments on Almond (Prunus dulcis) Bioactive Compounds, Antioxidant Activities, Fatty Acids, and Sensorial Characteristics (Ivo Oliveira; Anne S. Meyer; Sílvia Afonso; Alex Sequeira; Alice Vilela; Piebiep Goufo; Henrique Trindade; Berta Gonçalves, 2020) · full text checked
Show dataingredient-almond —has_sensory_response→ "Among 6 cultivars of raw almonds, bitterness and bitter-almond flavor differed by cultivar, and were strongest in Molar and Pegarinhos"
claim: clm-almond-six-cultivars-raw-bitter-difference / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-16
almond shows the sensory response Among 6 cultivars of almonds roasted at 138°C for 33 minutes, bitterness and bitter-almond flavor also differed by cultivar, and were strongest in Pegarinhos and Refêgosupported

Scope: Unpeeled kernels of the same 6 cultivars were roasted at 138°C for 33 minutes, and a trained panel of 12 rated them on a 1-5 point scale in a session separate from the raw samples

Note: This is a cultivar comparison within a single treatment, not a result directly comparing bitterness between raw and roasted samples. The causal component is not established.

In samples of unpeeled kernels roasted at 138°C for 33 minutes, skin color, bitter-almond flavor, bitterness, skin roughness, and sweet-almond flavor distinguished the cultivars. Pegarinhos and Refêgo had the highest bitter-almond flavor and bitterness, and Glorieta had the lowest bitter-almond flavor.
Limitations: This is a cultivar difference within roasted samples, not a result directly testing the difference in treatment from raw samples. The values shown in the figure should not be transcribed as precise numbers.
Source: Effects of Different Processing Treatments on Almond (Prunus dulcis) Bioactive Compounds, Antioxidant Activities, Fatty Acids, and Sensorial Characteristics (Ivo Oliveira; Anne S. Meyer; Sílvia Afonso; Alex Sequeira; Alice Vilela; Piebiep Goufo; Henrique Trindade; Berta Gonçalves, 2020) · full text checked
Show dataingredient-almond —has_sensory_response→ "Among 6 cultivars of almonds roasted at 138°C for 33 minutes, bitterness and bitter-almond flavor also differed by cultivar, and were strongest in Pegarinhos and Refêgo"
claim: clm-almond-six-cultivars-roasted-bitter-difference / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-16
almond shows the sensory response Among 6 cultivars that were blanched for 30 seconds to remove the skin and then roasted at 138°C for 33 minutes, the only sensory attributes showing a cultivar difference were the 2 hardness-related attributessupported

Scope: 30 seconds in boiling water, skin removed by hand, room-temperature drying, roasting at 138°C for 33 minutes. A trained panel of 12 rated the samples on a 1-5 point scale

Note: This is a result showing that, within this treatment group, bitterness did not distinguish the cultivars. It is not a result directly testing whether bitterness fell relative to raw or unpeeled-roasted samples.

In samples that were dipped in boiling water for 30 seconds, then had the skin removed by hand, air-dried at room temperature, and roasted at 138°C for 33 minutes, the only sensory attributes recorded with a cultivar difference were the hardness of the first bite and the force needed to crush the kernel. In Figure 1C, bitterness and bitter-almond flavor carry no significance mark.
Limitations: Limited to the cultivar difference within the treatment group; not a between-treatment comparison directly showing lower bitterness versus raw or unpeeled-roasted samples.
Source: Effects of Different Processing Treatments on Almond (Prunus dulcis) Bioactive Compounds, Antioxidant Activities, Fatty Acids, and Sensorial Characteristics (Ivo Oliveira; Anne S. Meyer; Sílvia Afonso; Alex Sequeira; Alice Vilela; Piebiep Goufo; Henrique Trindade; Berta Gonçalves, 2020) · full text checked
Show dataingredient-almond —has_sensory_response→ "Among 6 cultivars that were blanched for 30 seconds to remove the skin and then roasted at 138°C for 33 minutes, the only sensory attributes showing a cultivar difference were the 2 hardness-related attributes"
claim: clm-almond-blanched-roasted-cultivar-sensory / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-16
almond shows the sensory response In raw almonds of the 'Vairo' cultivar, there was no significant difference in bitterness intensity (0.5-0.6) or astringency intensity (0.5-0.7) across the 4 irrigation conditionssupported

Scope: A single orchard in Spain, harvested in 2017. A trained panel of 10 rated each sample 3 times on a 0-10 point scale

Note: This is a single-cultivar, single-year, single-orchard result, and it is not generalized to say that irrigation has no effect on almond bitterness. Whether the ± on irrigation volume denotes standard deviation or standard error is not specified in the text, so it is not included here.

Bitterness was 0.6, 0.6, 0.6, and 0.5 for T1 through T4, and astringency was 0.5, 0.6, 0.6, and 0.7; ANOVA for the irrigation treatment was not significant at p<0.05 for either. The values are means from a trained panel of 10.
Limitations: Single cultivar, single year, single orchard. The absence of a difference in bitterness and astringency is a result across the 4 conditions, and does not show a universal absence of irrigation effects. This should not be conflated with the separate Spanish/Romanian consumer trial.
Source: Sensory Profile and Acceptability of HydroSOStainable Almonds (Leontina Lipan; Marina Cano-Lamadrid; Mireia Corell; Esther Sendra; Francisca Hernández; Laura Stan; Dan Cristian Vodnar; Laura Vázquez-Araújo; Ángel A. Carbonell-Barrachina, 2019) · full text checked
Show dataingredient-almond —has_sensory_response→ "In raw almonds of the 'Vairo' cultivar, there was no significant difference in bitterness intensity (0.5-0.6) or astringency intensity (0.5-0.7) across the 4 irrigation conditions"
claim: clm-almond-vairo-irrigation-bitter-no-difference / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-16

↑ Top of page · ← Encyclopedia (English entries)