日本語版

Topic hub — 2026-09-19

When bitterness and harm are the same compound

In most bitter foods, the bitterness and everything else ride on different molecules. The bitterness of beer and its alcohol, the bitterness of coffee and its caffeine, can be moved independently inside the same drink. This page collects the cases where they cannot. Amygdalin in almonds and apricot kernels; the steroidal glycoalkaloids of potato and tomato. What the tongue picks up and what matters when the amount rises are carried by one and the same molecule.

That narrows the question to one. Do domestication, ripening and processing remove the bitterness alone, or do they remove both together? What follows lays out only the claims that still hold their measurements, in the order compound, amount, breeding, process.

On this page (8 sections)
  1. When one compound carries both
  2. Does bitterness move with the amount
  3. What domestication and breeding removed
  4. What ripening and processing remove
  5. What was measured and did not move
  6. Read in the encyclopedia
  7. Go deeper in the research notes
  8. Source ledger
↑

What this page establishes

When one compound carries both

The amygdalin that wild almonds accumulate is described in the literature itself as a bitter and toxic cyanogenic diglucoside. That is an attribution in words rather than a bitterness measurement, but it shows plainly that the two properties are tied to one compound name.

amygdalin — sensory attribute: bitternesssupported

Scope: Wild almond and bitter-kernel lineages.

Note: Not psychophysical bitterness measurements, but standard descriptions in plant science literature.

"Wild almond species accumulate the bitter and toxic cyanogenic diglucoside amygdalin".
Limitations: Not bitterness measurement values.
Source: Mutation of a bHLH transcription factor allowed almond domestication (Sánchez-Pérez R; Pavan S; Mazzeo R; ほか; Møller BL, 2019) · abstract checked
Show datacompound-amygdalin —has_sensory_attribute→ sensation-bitter
claim: clm-amygdalin-bitter / type: sensory / updated: 2026-08-31

Apricot kernels involve the same molecule. The statement that it converts to cyanide after eating, and the statement that it accounts for 2–5% of the kernel, come from different sources. By content it is not the most abundant component.

Scope: Raw apricot kernels.

"A naturally-occurring compound called amygdalin is present in apricot kernels and converts to cyanide after eating".
Limitations: A press release; the concentration data in the original statement have not been read.
Source: Apricot kernels pose risk of cyanide poisoning (European Food Safety Authority, 2016) · full text checked
Show dataingredient-bitter-apricot-kernel —contains→ compound-amygdalin
claim: clm-apricot-kernel-amygdalin / type: composition / updated: 2026-08-31
bitter apricot kernel contains amygdalinpreliminary

Scope: Layer: Food. Concentration description in the background explanation of research on ultrasound-assisted debittering of bitter-variety apricot kernels (prior research citation).

"Amygdalin is a characteristic compound in apricot kernels; although its content is not the highest (2-5%), it is very important to the product development and function evaluation of apricot kernels." (verbatim from text)
Limitations: Not the measured values of this research, but a secondary citation from prior work (reference 5). The original source remains unread.
Source: Effects of ultrasound irradiation on the properties of apricot kernels during accelerated debitterizing (Zhang QA; Shi FF; Yao JL; Zhang N, 2020) · full text checked
Show dataingredient-bitter-apricot-kernel —contains→ compound-amygdalin
claim: clm-w71b1-apricotkernel-amygdalin-content / type: composition / updated: 2026-09-07

In the nightshades the compound changes. Alpha-tomatine is the compound for which high content and bitterness were linked long ago in wild cherry tomatoes from the Rio Mayo valley in Peru, and recent genome work has identified 9 bitter-tasting accessions.

α-tomatine — sensory attribute: bitternesssupported

Scope: Fully ripe fruit of wild cherry tomato (Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme) from Peru's Río Mayo valley.

Note: Cárdenas et al. 2019 presents this association in its text as a citation of earlier work by Charles Rick and colleagues. It was not a new, independent human sensory test conducted by Cárdenas et al. themselves.

The source states 「初期のCharles Rickらの研究は、ペルー・リオマヨ渓谷産の野生型ミニトマト(S. lycopersicum var. cerasiforme)系統において、高いα-トマチン含量と苦味との顕著な関連を示した」 (in translation: "Early research by Charles Rick and colleagues showed a marked association between high α-tomatine content and bitterness in wild cherry tomato (S. lycopersicum var. cerasiforme) lines from Peru's Río Mayo valley").
Limitations: This is a citation of earlier research, not a new human sensory test conducted by Cárdenas et al. 2019. The original Rick papers were not read in this research.
The source states "we combined fine mapping with information from 150 resequenced genomes and genotyping a 650-tomato core collection to identify nine bitter-tasting accessions including the 'high tomatine' Peruvian landraces reported in the literature". The study reports that these bitter-tasting lines lack the GORKY gene (a nitrate/peptide-family transporter), preventing conversion to a nonbitter form through transport of α-tomatine from the vacuole to the cytoplasm.
Limitations: Only the Abstract was checked; the main Nature Plants article is behind a subscription barrier. Because the main text was not read, the specific sensory evaluation method and panel size used to classify the 9 accessions as 「苦味系統」 (in translation: "bitter-tasting lines") are unknown.
Source: The GORKY glycoalkaloid transporter is indispensable for preventing tomato bitterness (Kazachkova Y; Zemach I; Panda S; Bocobza S; Vainer A; Rogachev I; Dong Y; Ben-Dor S; Veres D; Kanstrup C; Lambertz SK; Crocoll C; Hu Y; Shani E; Michaeli S; Nour-Eldin HH; Zamir D; Aharoni A, 2021) · abstract checked
Show datacompound-alpha-tomatine —has_sensory_attribute→ sensation-bitter
claim: clm-tomato-wild-relative-bitter-alpha-tomatine / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-02

It is not confined to the fruit. The abstract states that it accumulates in all tissues and at particularly high levels in leaves and immature green fruits. Choosing which part to eat is already choosing how much bitterness.

tomato contains α-tomatinepreliminary

Scope: Layer: food. The background description of α-tomatine tissue distribution and taste in a recombinant-protein study.

Note: Only the abstract was checked; the full text was not reached. The abstract gives no specific concentration values. Earlier claims concern the GAME31 mechanism by which ripe fruit loses bitterness; this claim adds the association of high concentration and bitterness in different tissues, immature fruit and leaves.

"Tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum) contain steroidal glycoalkaloid α-tomatine, which functions as a chemical barrier to pathogens and predators. α-Tomatine accumulates in all tissues and at particularly high levels in leaves and immature green fruits. The compound ... causes a bitter taste." (Verbatim from the abstract, with an omission.)
Limitations: Only the abstract was checked. It gives no specific concentration values or human sensory evaluation.
Source: Identification of α-Tomatine 23-Hydroxylase Involved in the Detoxification of a Bitter Glycoalkaloid (Nakayasu M; Akiyama R; Kobayashi M; Lee HJ; Kawasaki T; Watanabe B; Urakawa S; Kato J; Sugimoto Y; Iijima Y; Saito K; Muranaka T; Umemoto N; Mizutani M, 2020) · abstract checked
Show dataingredient-tomato —contains→ compound-alpha-tomatine
claim: clm-w71b1-tomato-alphatomatine-tissue-distribution / type: composition / updated: 2026-09-07

Does bitterness move with the amount

If both properties ride on the same molecule, the tongue's rating and the analytical value ought to move together. In potato that has been measured directly. Of 13 clones, the 7 whose total glycoalkaloid content exceeded 14 mg/100g were rated bitter by a sensory panel, and the correlation between content and rating was r=0.93.

potato — bitterness correlates with: Total tuber glycoalkaloid content. Of 13 clones, the 7 exceeding 14 mg/100 g were rated bitter by a sensory panel; the correlation between content and bitterness rating was highly significant (r=0.93).supported

Scope: 13 clones of Solanum tuberosum.

Note: Sensory-panel assessment by the flavor-profile method. Total phenol content was reported to have no significant relation to bitterness or burning sensation.

Abstract statement: 「13クローン中、グリコアルカロイド含量が14 mg/100gを超えた7クローンが官能パネルにより苦いと評定された。グリコアルカロイド含量と苦味評定の相関は高度に有意(r=0.93)」 (in translation: "Among 13 clones, the 7 with glycoalkaloid content above 14 mg/100 g were rated bitter by a sensory panel. The correlation of glycoalkaloid content with bitterness ratings was highly significant (r=0.93)").
Limitations: The abstract does not give the number of panelists or details of the rating scale. The full text was not obtained.
Source: Effect of Glycoalkaloids and Phenolics on Potato Flavor (Sinden SL; Deahl KL; Aulenbach BB, 1976) · abstract checked
Show dataingredient-potato —has_bitterness_correlated_with→ "Total tuber glycoalkaloid content. Of 13 clones, the 7 exceeding 14 mg/100 g were rated bitter by a sensory panel; the correlation between content and bitterness rating was highly significant (r=0.93)."
claim: clm-potato-glycoalkaloid-bitterness-correlation / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-02

That figure comes from an abstract, though, and the panel size and scale could not be confirmed. A high correlation cannot be read as the tongue standing in for the instrument. As the next section shows, the people managing the cultivar record drew their line on measured content, not on taste.

What domestication and breeding removed

How the almond became food answers this page's question most directly. Map-based cloning in a reference genome and a taste-segregating F1 population showed that the bHLH2 transcription factor controls transcription of PdCYP79D16 and PdCYP71AN24. A single substitution (Leu to Phe) in its dimerisation domain halts that transcription and produces the sweet-kernel trait. The mutation that removed the bitterness is what allowed domestication.

amygdalin has its biosynthesis controlled by The bHLH2 transcription factor. A point mutation in its dimerization domain (Leu→Phe) stopped transcription of PdCYP79D16 and PdCYP71AN24, producing the sweet kernel (bitterness-loss) trait and enabling almond domestication.supported

Scope: Map-based cloning of the almond reference genome and an F1 population segregating for flavor.

Map-based cloning of the reference genome and F1 segregating population identified a cluster of bHLH1-5. Functional analysis showed that bHLH2 controls the transcription of PdCYP79D16 and PdCYP71AN24, and that a Leu→Phe point mutation in the dimerization domain produced the sweet kernel trait.
Source: Mutation of a bHLH transcription factor allowed almond domestication (Sánchez-Pérez R; Pavan S; Mazzeo R; ほか; Møller BL, 2019) · abstract checked
Show datacompound-amygdalin —has_biosynthesis_controlled_by→ "The bHLH2 transcription factor. A point mutation in its dimerization domain (Leu→Phe) stopped transcription of PdCYP79D16 and PdCYP71AN24, producing the sweet kernel (bitterness-loss) trait and enabling almond domestication."
claim: clm-almond-sweet-kernel-mutation / type: mechanism / updated: 2026-08-31

Potato has had the same thing done by modern means. Silencing the GAME4 gene is described as capable of reducing steroidal glycoalkaloid content in leaves and tubers by up to 74-fold. That review does not connect the content directly to sensory bitterness.

potato has debittering most likely due to Up to a 74-fold reduction in steroidal glycoalkaloid (SGA) content in leaves and tubers through silencing of the GAME4 gene.supported

Scope: Solanum tuberosum.

Checked the statement 「GAME4のサイレンシングは葉・塊茎のSGA含量を最大74倍低減しうる」 (in translation: "GAME4 silencing may reduce SGA content in leaves and tubers by up to 74-fold").
Limitations: The review does not directly discuss the correlation between SGA content and taste or sensory bitterness.
Source: Potato steroidal glycoalkaloids: properties, biosynthesis, regulation and genetic manipulation (Liu Y; Liu X; Li Y; Pei Y; Jaleel A; Ren M, 2024) · full text checked
Show dataingredient-potato —has_debittering_most_likely_due_to→ "Up to a 74-fold reduction in steroidal glycoalkaloid (SGA) content in leaves and tubers through silencing of the GAME4 gene."
claim: clm-potato-game4-reduces-sga / type: mechanism / updated: 2026-09-02

A case of getting the removal wrong is on record too. 'Lenape' in the United States and 'Magnum Bonum' in Sweden were both widely grown before being withdrawn from the market over high tuber content. That the decision was made on content rather than on taste is worth reading next to the correlation in the previous section.

potato — history: 'Lenape' in the United States and 'Magnum Bonum' in Sweden were both withdrawn from the market after having been widely cultivated because of high steroidal glycoalkaloid content in their tubers.contextual

Scope: History of Solanum tuberosum cultivars.

Note: The source review records only the withdrawal, without giving precise content values or withdrawal years. A quantitative primary source (Zitnak & Johnston 1970, among others) was located bibliographically on Crossref, but its abstract was not read and it is not included.

Checked the statement 「米国で'Lenape'、スウェーデンで'Magnum Bonum'として、かつて広く栽培された品種が、塊茎の高いSGA含量を理由に市場から撤去されねばならなかった」 (in translation: "Cultivars once widely grown as 'Lenape' in the United States and 'Magnum Bonum' in Sweden had to be withdrawn from the market because of high SGA content in their tubers").
Limitations: The review does not give the exact withdrawal years or content values; the primary source (Zitnak & Johnston 1970, among others) was not read, so these were not included.
Source: Potato steroidal glycoalkaloids: properties, biosynthesis, regulation and genetic manipulation (Liu Y; Liu X; Li Y; Pei Y; Jaleel A; Ren M, 2024) · full text checked
Show dataingredient-potato —has_history→ "'Lenape' in the United States and 'Magnum Bonum' in Sweden were both withdrawn from the market after having been widely cultivated because of high steroidal glycoalkaloid content in their tubers."
claim: clm-potato-lenape-magnum-bonum-withdrawn / type: cultural / updated: 2026-09-02

What ripening and processing remove

Even without changing the cultivar by breeding, the fruit removes its own bitterness as it ripens. GAME31, a 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenase, hydroxylates alpha-tomatine to hydroxytomatine, the first step of a route that converts it into non-bitter esculeoside A and related compounds in the ripe fruit. In lines where the enzyme was silenced, glycoalkaloids normally present only in traces in ripe fruit rose by up to 22-fold against the wild type.

tomato has debittering most likely due to Hydroxylation of the bitter steroidal glycoalkaloid alpha-tomatine to hydroxytomatine by GAME31 (a 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenase). During ripening, a pathway starting from this reaction converts it into non-bitter esculeoside A and related compounds, which removes the bitterness of the ripe fruit.supported

Scope: Tomato, Solanum lycopersicum (cultivated varieties including cv. M82)

Note: In lines where GAME31 was silenced, SGA in ripe fruit increased up to 22-fold relative to the wild type, confirming through reverse genetics that loss of this enzyme can bring bitterness back.

Showed, using LC-MS metabolite profiling and gene-expression manipulation lines, that the 2-ODD enzyme GAME31 hydroxylates alpha-tomatine to hydroxytomatine, forming the first step of the pathway that converts it into non-bitter esculeoside A and related compounds during ripening.
Limitations: No human sensory testing was performed. The attribution of bitterness is based on chemical structure (that these are known bitter compounds).
In lines where GAME31 was silenced, SGA -- normally present only in trace amounts in ripe fruit -- increased up to 22-fold relative to the wild type. Confirmed through reverse genetics that loss of GAME31 function leads to SGA accumulation (bitterness).
Limitations: No sensory evaluation was performed. Chemical quantification only.
Show dataingredient-tomato —has_debittering_most_likely_due_to→ "Hydroxylation of the bitter steroidal glycoalkaloid alpha-tomatine to hydroxytomatine by GAME31 (a 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenase). During ripening, a pathway starting from this reaction converts it into non-bitter esculeoside A and related compounds, which removes the bitterness of the ripe fruit."
claim: clm-tomato-game31-debitters-ripe-fruit / type: mechanism / updated: 2026-09-02

A parallel route through a different enzyme sits inside the same ripening. Sl23DOX hydroxylates at position 23 and the product isomerises spontaneously to neorickiioside B. This is not a tidy picture in which stopping one pathway brings the bitterness back.

tomato is processed by Sl23DOX, an α-tomatine 23-hydroxylase and a 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenase, hydroxylates position 23. Its product spontaneously isomerizes to neorickiioside B, forming an intermediate in α-tomatine metabolism during ripening. This is a parallel metabolic pathway involving an enzyme distinct from GAME31.preliminary

Scope: Layer: food. Biochemical analysis with recombinant Sl23DOX protein and confirmation in Sl23DOX-overexpressing and silenced transgenic tomato plants.

"This study identifies the gene encoding a 23-hydroxylase of α-tomatine, which is a key to this process... Biochemical analysis of the recombinant Sl23DOX protein demonstrated that it catalyzes the 23-hydroxylation of α-tomatine and the product spontaneously isomerizes to neorickiioside B, which is an intermediate in α-tomatine metabolism that appears during ripening." (Verbatim from the abstract.)
Limitations: Only the abstract was checked. No human sensory test was performed; attribution of bitterness is based on compound identification.
Source: Identification of α-Tomatine 23-Hydroxylase Involved in the Detoxification of a Bitter Glycoalkaloid (Nakayasu M; Akiyama R; Kobayashi M; Lee HJ; Kawasaki T; Watanabe B; Urakawa S; Kato J; Sugimoto Y; Iijima Y; Saito K; Muranaka T; Umemoto N; Mizutani M, 2020) · abstract checked
Show dataingredient-tomato —is_processed_by→ "Sl23DOX, an α-tomatine 23-hydroxylase and a 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenase, hydroxylates position 23. Its product spontaneously isomerizes to neorickiioside B, forming an intermediate in α-tomatine metabolism during ripening. This is a parallel metabolic pathway involving an enzyme distinct from GAME31."
claim: clm-w71b1-tomato-sl23dox-pathway / type: mechanism / updated: 2026-09-07

Stopping the ripening itself has also been measured. In red-ripe fruit of mutants lacking the ripening regulators NOR and RIN, the bitter glycoalkaloids increased significantly while non-bitter esculeoside A fell. Turning red and losing the bitterness are under the same control.

α-tomatine occurs in tomatosupported

Scope: Layer: food. Comparison of red-ripe fruit from NOR-KO and RIN-KO tomato mutants with wild type; glycoside quantification by LC-MS and GAME gene-expression analysis by RT-qPCR.

"the levels of α-tomatine, hydroxytomatine, acetoxytomatine, and acetoxy-hydroxytomatine were significantly increased whereas that of esculeoside A was markedly lower in NOR-KO and RIN-KO fruits compared to WT fruits."
Limitations: These data come from gene-knockout mutants under manipulated conditions beyond natural variation in ordinary ripening. The sensory intensity of α-tomatine bitterness itself was not measured in this study; it is treated as a known property based on earlier literature.
Source: Removal of toxic steroidal glycoalkaloids and bitterness in tomato is controlled by a complex epigenetic and genetic network (Bai F; Wu M; Huang W; Xu W; Wang Y; Zhang Y; Zhong Z; Hong Y; Pirrello J; Bouzayen M; Liu M, 2025) · full text checked
Show datacompound-alpha-tomatine —occurs_in→ ingredient-tomato
claim: clm-w72a1-tomato-nor-rin-alphatomatine-retention / type: mechanism / updated: 2026-09-08

On the processing side, an ultrasonically accelerated debittering technique for apricot kernels has been examined. It shortens the treatment time against conventional methods while substantially improving beta-glucosidase activity, colour and texture, with little effect on oil and protein content. No human rating of bitterness intensity was carried out; the assessment stops at physical and biochemical indicators.

bitter apricot kernel can be debittered by: Ultrasonically accelerated debitterizing. It shortens processing time compared with conventional methods and substantially improves β-glucosidase activity, color, and texture, while having little effect on oil and protein contents.supported

Scope: Layer: Food. An experimental study on bitter apricot kernels comparing physical properties before and after debittering with UV-Vis spectroscopy, fluorescence spectroscopy, circular dichroism, electrophoresis, environmental scanning electron microscopy, thermal analysis, and other methods.

Note: These are main experimental findings of the study itself, checked in its full text. They add an account of debittering as a processing technology, separate from EFSA’s ARfD assessment.

Verbatim from the main text: "The results indicate that the novel debitterizing technique has insignificant influences on the oil and protein contents of apricot kernels; meanwhile, the color, texture and activity of beta-glucosidase were substantially improved, greatly contributing to the quality modification and shortening the debitterizing time."
Limitations: No human sensory assessment directly measuring bitterness intensity was performed. Evaluation was limited to physical and biochemical measures such as β-glucosidase activity.
Source: Effects of ultrasound irradiation on the properties of apricot kernels during accelerated debitterizing (Zhang QA; Shi FF; Yao JL; Zhang N, 2020) · full text checked
Show dataingredient-bitter-apricot-kernel —can_be_debittered_by→ "Ultrasonically accelerated debitterizing. It shortens processing time compared with conventional methods and substantially improves β-glucosidase activity, color, and texture, while having little effect on oil and protein contents."
claim: clm-w71b1-apricotkernel-ultrasound-debittering / type: processing / updated: 2026-09-07

Alongside the debittering work, raw kernels carry a separate yardstick of amount. The acute reference dose for cyanide is 20 µg/kg body weight; for adults, up to 3 small raw kernels (370 mg) stays below it, while more than 3, or less than half of a large kernel, may exceed it, and for toddlers 1 small kernel may exceed it. The debittering research and this statement of amount do not meet inside one paper.

bitter apricot kernel can_exceed_acute_reference_dose_at The acute reference dose (ARfD) for cyanide is 20 µg/kg body weight. EFSA states that up to 3 small raw apricot kernels (370 mg) do not exceed the adult ARfD, but more than 3 small kernels or less than half a large kernel may exceed it. 1 small kernel may exceed it for a young child.supported

Scope: Consumption of raw apricot kernels.

Note: This is from an official press announcement. The underlying scientific opinion (EFSA Journal 2016;14(4):4424) has not been read, and this is not an intake recommendation. A correction changed the wording for large kernels from 「1個超」 (in translation: "more than 1 kernel") to 「半分未満」 (in translation: "less than half a kernel").

The CONTAM Panel set the ARfD at 20 µg/kg body weight. It stated that up to 3 small kernels (370 mg) would not exceed the adult level, but more than 3 or less than half a large kernel could exceed it. 1 small kernel could exceed the level for a young child.
Limitations: The underlying opinion has not been read. The official press announcement corrected large-kernel wording from 「1個超」 (in translation: "more than 1 kernel") to 「半分未満」 (in translation: "less than half a kernel").
Source: Apricot kernels pose risk of cyanide poisoning (European Food Safety Authority, 2016) · full text checked
Show dataingredient-bitter-apricot-kernel —can_exceed_acute_reference_dose_at→ "The acute reference dose (ARfD) for cyanide is 20 µg/kg body weight. EFSA states that up to 3 small raw apricot kernels (370 mg) do not exceed the adult ARfD, but more than 3 small kernels or less than half a large kernel may exceed it. 1 small kernel may exceed it for a young child."
claim: clm-apricot-kernel-acute-risk / type: safety / updated: 2026-08-31

In almonds, the bitterness that was not fully removed survives as a difference between cultivars. Across 6 raw cultivars, bitterness and bitter-almond flavour differed by cultivar and were strongest in Molar and Pegarinhos. Across the same 6 cultivars roasted at 138 degC for 33 minutes, the cultivar difference persisted, strongest in Pegarinhos and Refêgo.

almond shows the sensory response Among 6 cultivars of raw almonds, bitterness and bitter-almond flavor differed by cultivar, and were strongest in Molar and Pegarinhossupported

Scope: 6 cultivars harvested in Portugal in 2019. A trained panel of 12 rated raw samples on a 1-5 point intensity scale

Note: This is a comparison among cultivars, not a bitterness ranking for edible almonds in general. The authors' speculation that this is due to benzaldehyde is not adopted here.

In raw samples, there were significant cultivar differences in skin color, bitter-almond flavor, and bitterness, and bitter-almond flavor and bitterness were most strongly associated with Molar and Pegarinhos. Figure 1A marks the relevant attributes as significant.
Limitations: This is a cultivar difference within raw samples. Numerical means appear only in a figure, not a table; this does not establish a chemical cause for the taste difference.
Source: Effects of Different Processing Treatments on Almond (Prunus dulcis) Bioactive Compounds, Antioxidant Activities, Fatty Acids, and Sensorial Characteristics (Ivo Oliveira; Anne S. Meyer; Sílvia Afonso; Alex Sequeira; Alice Vilela; Piebiep Goufo; Henrique Trindade; Berta Gonçalves, 2020) · full text checked
Show dataingredient-almond —has_sensory_response→ "Among 6 cultivars of raw almonds, bitterness and bitter-almond flavor differed by cultivar, and were strongest in Molar and Pegarinhos"
claim: clm-almond-six-cultivars-raw-bitter-difference / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-16
almond shows the sensory response Among 6 cultivars of almonds roasted at 138°C for 33 minutes, bitterness and bitter-almond flavor also differed by cultivar, and were strongest in Pegarinhos and Refêgosupported

Scope: Unpeeled kernels of the same 6 cultivars were roasted at 138°C for 33 minutes, and a trained panel of 12 rated them on a 1-5 point scale in a session separate from the raw samples

Note: This is a cultivar comparison within a single treatment, not a result directly comparing bitterness between raw and roasted samples. The causal component is not established.

In samples of unpeeled kernels roasted at 138°C for 33 minutes, skin color, bitter-almond flavor, bitterness, skin roughness, and sweet-almond flavor distinguished the cultivars. Pegarinhos and Refêgo had the highest bitter-almond flavor and bitterness, and Glorieta had the lowest bitter-almond flavor.
Limitations: This is a cultivar difference within roasted samples, not a result directly testing the difference in treatment from raw samples. The values shown in the figure should not be transcribed as precise numbers.
Source: Effects of Different Processing Treatments on Almond (Prunus dulcis) Bioactive Compounds, Antioxidant Activities, Fatty Acids, and Sensorial Characteristics (Ivo Oliveira; Anne S. Meyer; Sílvia Afonso; Alex Sequeira; Alice Vilela; Piebiep Goufo; Henrique Trindade; Berta Gonçalves, 2020) · full text checked
Show dataingredient-almond —has_sensory_response→ "Among 6 cultivars of almonds roasted at 138°C for 33 minutes, bitterness and bitter-almond flavor also differed by cultivar, and were strongest in Pegarinhos and Refêgo"
claim: clm-almond-six-cultivars-roasted-bitter-difference / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-16

Roasting temperature itself acts on bitterness. Comparing 150 to 190 degC, the 190 degC samples showed intense burnt notes, and consumer liking was negatively linked to pyrazines, bitterness, astringency and burnt flavour. That this runs in the opposite direction from cacao, where higher roasting temperature lowered perceived bitterness, can be read against thecacao hub.

almond — perceived bitterness is affected by: Roasting temperature (150-190°C)preliminary

Scope: Layer: food. Spanish 'Vairo' almonds grown under regulated deficit irrigation, roasted in a convection oven. 35 volatile compounds (GC analysis), a descriptive sensory profile, and a consumer preference test.

Note: Based on an abstract quotation via a search engine and Europe PMC (the full text was not confirmed on either Wiley or PubMed, both blocked with a 403). Roasting at 190°C is described as giving a deep color and burnt notes, 150°C as under-roasted, and 170°C for 10 minutes was concluded to be the optimum condition. Consumers' overall liking is reported to have shown a positive correlation with certain volatile compounds and with roasted/nutty sensory attributes, while showing a negative correlation with pyrazines, bitterness, astringency, woodiness, and burnt flavor. Statistical values (correlation coefficients, p-values) were not confirmed. An example of a roast-degree series for a nut (almond) other than coffee.

Quotation: “Almonds roasted at 190°C presented intense color and burnt notes, while almonds roasted at 150°C were under-roasted.” “consumers overall liking was positively linked to specific volatiles (alkanes, alcohols, aldehydes, and furans) and sensory attributes (sweetness, roasted, almond ID, nutty, hardness, and crispiness), but negatively correlated with pyrazines, bitterness, astringency, woody, and burnt flavor notes.” “roasting at 170°C for 10 min in a convective oven were the optimum conditions.”
Limitations: Based on a quotation obtained via a search engine and Europe PMC; the original paper's full text, statistical values (correlation coefficients, p-values), and panel size were not confirmed.
Source: Optimization of roasting conditions in hydroSOStainable almonds using volatile and descriptive sensory profiles and consumer acceptance (Lipan L; Cano-Lamadrid M; Vazquez-Araujo L; Lyczko J; Moriana A; Hernandez F; Garcia-Garcia E; Carbonell-Barrachina AA, 2020) · abstract checked
Show dataingredient-almond —has_perceived_bitterness_affected_by→ "Roasting temperature (150-190°C)"
claim: clm-w70b-almond-roasting-bitterness-burnt-liking / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-07

What was measured and did not move

Measurements that produced no difference are given the same weight as those that did.

For 6 cultivars blanched for 30 seconds in boiling water, skinned, and roasted at 138 degC for 33 minutes, the only sensory attributes that differed by cultivar were the two about hardness at first chew, and bitterness and bitter-almond flavour carried no significance marks. It looks as though removing the skin erased the cultivar difference, but this is a comparison within one treatment group, not a direct comparison between treatments.

almond shows the sensory response Among 6 cultivars that were blanched for 30 seconds to remove the skin and then roasted at 138°C for 33 minutes, the only sensory attributes showing a cultivar difference were the 2 hardness-related attributessupported

Scope: 30 seconds in boiling water, skin removed by hand, room-temperature drying, roasting at 138°C for 33 minutes. A trained panel of 12 rated the samples on a 1-5 point scale

Note: This is a result showing that, within this treatment group, bitterness did not distinguish the cultivars. It is not a result directly testing whether bitterness fell relative to raw or unpeeled-roasted samples.

In samples that were dipped in boiling water for 30 seconds, then had the skin removed by hand, air-dried at room temperature, and roasted at 138°C for 33 minutes, the only sensory attributes recorded with a cultivar difference were the hardness of the first bite and the force needed to crush the kernel. In Figure 1C, bitterness and bitter-almond flavor carry no significance mark.
Limitations: Limited to the cultivar difference within the treatment group; not a between-treatment comparison directly showing lower bitterness versus raw or unpeeled-roasted samples.
Source: Effects of Different Processing Treatments on Almond (Prunus dulcis) Bioactive Compounds, Antioxidant Activities, Fatty Acids, and Sensorial Characteristics (Ivo Oliveira; Anne S. Meyer; Sílvia Afonso; Alex Sequeira; Alice Vilela; Piebiep Goufo; Henrique Trindade; Berta Gonçalves, 2020) · full text checked
Show dataingredient-almond —has_sensory_response→ "Among 6 cultivars that were blanched for 30 seconds to remove the skin and then roasted at 138°C for 33 minutes, the only sensory attributes showing a cultivar difference were the 2 hardness-related attributes"
claim: clm-almond-blanched-roasted-cultivar-sensory / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-16

On the growing side nothing moved. In raw 'Vairo' almonds under 4 irrigation regimes, bitterness intensity ran 0.5 to 0.6 and astringency 0.5 to 0.7, with no significant differences. This is a single cultivar, a single year and a single orchard.

almond shows the sensory response In raw almonds of the 'Vairo' cultivar, there was no significant difference in bitterness intensity (0.5-0.6) or astringency intensity (0.5-0.7) across the 4 irrigation conditionssupported

Scope: A single orchard in Spain, harvested in 2017. A trained panel of 10 rated each sample 3 times on a 0-10 point scale

Note: This is a single-cultivar, single-year, single-orchard result, and it is not generalized to say that irrigation has no effect on almond bitterness. Whether the ± on irrigation volume denotes standard deviation or standard error is not specified in the text, so it is not included here.

Bitterness was 0.6, 0.6, 0.6, and 0.5 for T1 through T4, and astringency was 0.5, 0.6, 0.6, and 0.7; ANOVA for the irrigation treatment was not significant at p<0.05 for either. The values are means from a trained panel of 10.
Limitations: Single cultivar, single year, single orchard. The absence of a difference in bitterness and astringency is a result across the 4 conditions, and does not show a universal absence of irrigation effects. This should not be conflated with the separate Spanish/Romanian consumer trial.
Source: Sensory Profile and Acceptability of HydroSOStainable Almonds (Leontina Lipan; Marina Cano-Lamadrid; Mireia Corell; Esther Sendra; Francisca Hernández; Laura Stan; Dan Cristian Vodnar; Laura Vázquez-Araújo; Ángel A. Carbonell-Barrachina, 2019) · full text checked
Show dataingredient-almond —has_sensory_response→ "In raw almonds of the 'Vairo' cultivar, there was no significant difference in bitterness intensity (0.5-0.6) or astringency intensity (0.5-0.7) across the 4 irrigation conditions"
claim: clm-almond-vairo-irrigation-bitter-no-difference / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-16

Questions people ask

Does "bitter means dangerous" hold here?

Within the scope of this page there is one case where amount and bitterness moved together. In potato the correlation between total glycoalkaloid content and bitterness rating was r=0.93, and the 7 clones above 14 mg/100g were rated bitter. But the correlation comes from an abstract whose panel size and scale could not be confirmed, and the decision to withdraw 'Lenape' and 'Magnum Bonum' was made on content. Nothing on this page records a line drawn on taste alone.

Are sweet almonds and bitter almonds different species?

They are not. A single substitution (Leu to Phe) in the dimerisation domain of the bHLH2 transcription factor is reported to halt transcription of the two genes involved in amygdalin synthesis and to produce the sweet-kernel trait. One difference at one position separates edible from inedible.

Why do tomatoes stop being bitter as they ripen?

Because an enzyme converts the bitter compound into a different one during ripening. GAME31 hydroxylates alpha-tomatine, opening the route to non-bitter esculeoside A and related compounds in the ripe fruit. In lines where that enzyme is stopped, the glycoalkaloids rise by up to 22-fold even in ripe fruit, and in fruit lacking the ripening regulators NOR and RIN the bitter side rises while esculeoside A falls. Colouring up and losing the bitterness are not separate.

Is removing the bitterness by processing enough?

For apricot kernels an ultrasonic debittering method has been studied, but that study carried out no human rating of bitterness intensity and stops at indicators such as beta-glucosidase activity. Separately, raw kernels carry an acute reference dose of 20 µg/kg body weight. The two sit in different sources, and this page does not add them together.

What is not known

Read in the encyclopedia

All entries in this hub (6)

Every encyclopedia entry that belongs to this hub, grouped by category. Entries without an English version open in Japanese.

ingredientalmond · bitter apricot kernel · potato · tomato

compoundamygdalin · α-tomatine

Go deeper in the research notes

Source ledger

The primary sources and limitations for the claims on this page can be checked from the source links inside each card. The full list is on the Japanesesource ledger.

How to cite this page

Aoki, M. (NIGAMI LAB) (2026). When bitterness and harm are the same compound. https://nigamilab.com/en/topics/toxic-bitter-seeds/

Each claim card has a stable anchor (#clm-…). The dataset is CC BY 4.0; see the data page. Dataset DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22739101