日本語版

beer

ingredient / ingredient-beer

ビール

Beer is a grain-fermented beverage in which hop-derived bitter acids, humulinones, and polyphenols overlap, changing not only intensity but also attack and aftertaste.

Photographs (captions in Japanese)

透明なパイントグラスに満たされた、上から下へ濃さが変わる琥珀色から赤みがかったオレンジ色の液体。表面に厚みのある白い泡が乗っている。

ビール(IPAスタイルの一例)。パイントグラスに注がれた琥珀色のビールで、表面に白い泡の層が立っている。原典キャプションは「Hoppyum IPA」というホップを効かせた自家醸造ビールと記す。ビール全般の標準形ではなく、IPAと呼ばれるスタイルの一例である。

写っているもの: 該当分類群なし(IPAスタイルのビール一杯)部位・状態: パイントグラスに注がれた、白い泡の層をのせた琥珀色のIPA(インディア・ペール・エール)。液体そのものの色・泡立ちが見える状態

写真: misterkong/ CC BY-SA 3.0/ 原画像/ 台帳の原画像

写真の範囲と来歴

被写体の確認: 原典の記載による同定。原典キャプションは「A pint of Hoppyum IPA」とのみ記載。銘柄・醸造所の詳細は不明で、ビール全般の代表例ではなく苦味の強いIPAスタイルの一例として掲載する。

掲載画像: Wikimedia Commons の1920px版。苦味研究所では切り抜き・色調変更なし。 表示用には幅1200px上限のWebPを配信し、台帳の原画像は上のリンクから確認できます。

On this page (8 sections)
  1. Overview
  2. Sources for this overview (8)
  3. Topic hubs
  4. Follow the connections
  5. Related entries (10)
  6. Composition and content (3)
  7. Sensory (5)
  8. Culture (1)
↑

Reading the bitterness

When viewed through bitterness, hops in beer are not merely a flavoring agent. In one glass lie multiple compounds derived from different sources with different properties: hop bitter acids including iso-α-acids, humulinones arising from oxidation, and polyphenols. Some bitterness hits sharply the moment it enters the mouth; other bitterness gradually strengthens, rounds off, and fades. Beer bitterness is not merely 「強い・弱い」 (in translation: "strong or weak")—it is a taste with form and time.

Therefore, the IBU on the label alone cannot account for the bitterness in the glass. In more than 120 commercial highly hopped beer brands, the relationship between Bitterness Units (BU) and human-rated bitterness intensity was non-linear. In dry hopping, humulinones and polyphenols increase while iso-α-acids may decrease, as has been reported. IBU is an analytical measurement of bitterness-related components determined by a standard method; it does not convert the quality or perception of bitterness into a single score.

Furthermore, bitterness does not finish in the fermentation tank and remain unchanged. In a trial tracking 9 beers of different alcohol content through before and after swallowing, the high-alcohol group showed bitterness and astringency as more dominant. However, because differences among individual products are also involved, this cannot be attributed to alcohol alone. The influence of hop freshness on bitterness quality was not the same between dry hopping and long-duration boiling. Which hop, when, in what state it is added, and how it rises and falls in the mouth—all of this is beer bitterness.

Sources for this overview

  1. The impact of hop bitter acid and polyphenol profiles on the perceived bitterness of beer

    Oladokun O; Tarrega A; James S; Smart K; Hort J; Cook D / 2016 / journal article / full text checked

    Checked for this overview: Analysis of hop bitter acids in commercial lagers / Analysis of polyphenols in commercial lagers / Sensory study linking bitterness onset and quality to compound composition and hopping method

  2. Evaluation of Nonvolatile Chemistry Affecting Sensory Bitterness Intensity of Highly Hopped Beers

    Hahn CD; Lafontaine SR; Pereira CB; Shellhammer TH / 2018 / journal article / abstract checked

    Checked for this overview: Analysis of humulinones in commercial highly hopped beers / Research on more than 120 highly hopped beers showing non-linear relationship between BU and rated bitterness intensity

  3. Analysis of the components of hard resin in hops (Humulus lupulus L.) and structural elucidation of their transformation products formed during the brewing process

    Taniguchi Y; Taniguchi H; Yamada M; Matsukura Y; Koizumi H; Furihata K; Shindo K / 2014 / journal article / abstract checked

    Checked for this overview: Research identifying humulinones as oxidation products of hop acids

  4. Toward Understanding the Bitterness of Dry-Hopped Beer

    Parkin E; Shellhammer TH / 2017 / journal article / abstract checked

    Checked for this overview: Research showing that dry hopping can raise humulinones and polyphenols while lowering iso-α-acids

  5. Effects of Dry-Hopping on Beer Chemistry and Sensory Properties - A Review

    Klimczak K; Cioch-Skoneczny M; Duda-Chodak A / 2023 / review / full text checked

    Checked for this overview: Review synthesizing the distinction between IBU and perceived bitterness

  6. Exploring the flavor life cycle of beers with varying alcohol content

    Missbach Benjamin; Majchrzak Dorota; Sulzner Raphael; Wansink Brian; Reichel Martin; Koenig Juergen / 2017 / journal article / full text checked

    Checked for this overview: TDS research on 9 beers of different alcohol content tracked through swallowing

  7. Impact of Hop Freshness on Dry Hopped Beer Quality

    Rutnik K; Ocvirk M; Košir IJ / 2022 / journal article / full text checked

    Checked for this overview: Small-scale sensory trial comparing hop freshness index with bitterness quality of dry-hopped beers

  8. The Impact of Hop Freshness on Kettle-Hopped Beers

    Rutnik K; Ocvirk M; Košir IJ / 2023 / journal article / full text checked

    Checked for this overview: Sister study showing how boiling duration alters the bitterness effect of aged hops

Follow the connections

beer →contains→ hop bitter acids →contributes to→ bitterness

beer →contains→ humulinones →contributes to→ bitterness

beer →contains→ polyphenols →contributes to→ bitterness

Hypotheses and recipe candidates for this entry are on the Japanese page.

Structured claims — open a section to read each claim's confidence, evidence and limits

Composition and content (3)

beer contains hop bitter acidssupported

Scope: Commercial lager beers chemically analyzed in the cited study

Note: Concentration and product profile vary. / 2026-08-31: calibration-downgraded from established to supported because the supporting evidence has no full-text-checked source. May be re-upgraded once full text is checked.

Hop bitter acids in commercial beers were analyzed, and concentrations varied.
Limitations: Composition specific to each product.
Source: The impact of hop bitter acid and polyphenol profiles on the perceived bitterness of beer (Oladokun O; Tarrega A; James S; Smart K; Hort J; Cook D, 2016) · abstract checked
Show dataingredient-beer —contains→ compound-hop-bitter-acids
claim: clm-beer-contains-hop-acids / type: composition / updated: 2026-08-31
beer contains humulinonessupported

Scope: Highly hopped commercial beer in the cited study

Note: Humulinones arise through oxidation and are not present in equal amounts in every beer.

Humulinones were measured in strongly hopped commercial beer and modeled as a contributor.
Limitations: Limited to a sample frame of strongly hopped beers.
Source: Evaluation of Nonvolatile Chemistry Affecting Sensory Bitterness Intensity of Highly Hopped Beers (Hahn CD; Lafontaine SR; Pereira CB; Shellhammer TH, 2018) · abstract checked
Context: Compositional analysis of hop resin identified humulinones (and hulupones) as soft-resin components and showed that both are oxidation products derived from alpha acids and beta acids. Conversion behavior in a wort-boil model was also examined. This corroborates, from an independent group (Kirin), the origin pathway of humulinones in beer (oxidation of hop acids followed by transfer during the brewing process).
Limitations: Abstract only confirmed. Since this is not a quantification of humulinones in beer itself, the relation is contextualizes (direct support for the existence claim depends on Hahn 2018).
Source: Analysis of the components of hard resin in hops (Humulus lupulus L.) and structural elucidation of their transformation products formed during the brewing process (Taniguchi Y; Taniguchi H; Yamada M; Matsukura Y; Koizumi H; Furihata K; Shindo K, 2014) · abstract checked
A group independent of the Shellhammer/OSU lineage (a Taiwanese normal university plus a brewery) developed an LC-MS/MS method that quantifies 60 hop-derived bitter compounds in 25 minutes (LOQ for humulinones 0.053 ng/mL, r>0.99, recovery 86.3-118.1%), and tracked the variation of bitter compounds including humulinones across the full fermentation and storage process for a dry-hopped Double IPA and a non-dry-hopped Vienna Lager. It also reported that the profile of oxidation and cyclization products differed between the two beers. This confirms, with independent analytical chemistry, the presence of humulinones in beer and their process dependence.
Limitations: Abstract only confirmed. Individual concentration values are not given in the abstract. No sensory data. The abstract's opening statement, "major contributors to beer bitterness are isohumulones and humulinones," is part of the introduction and is not something demonstrated by this study itself.
Source: Quantification of Hop-Derived Bitter Compounds in Beer Using Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (Teng CE; Wang YM; Li TH; Chen SF, 2024) · full text checked
Show dataingredient-beer —contains→ compound-humulinones
claim: clm-beer-contains-humulinones / type: composition / updated: 2026-08-30
beer contains polyphenolssupported

Scope: Commercial lager beers chemically analyzed in the cited study

Note: Polyphenol composition varies with raw materials and process. / 2026-08-31: calibration-downgraded from established to supported because the supporting evidence has no full-text-checked source. May be re-upgraded once full text is checked.

Commercial beers were analyzed for phenolic acids and polyphenols, showing diverse profiles.
Limitations: Composition specific to each product.
Source: The impact of hop bitter acid and polyphenol profiles on the perceived bitterness of beer (Oladokun O; Tarrega A; James S; Smart K; Hort J; Cook D, 2016) · abstract checked
Show dataingredient-beer —contains→ compound-polyphenols
claim: clm-beer-contains-polyphenols / type: composition / updated: 2026-08-31

Sensory (5)

beer has its bitterness character influenced by Hop bitter acid and polyphenol profile, and hopping strategysupported

Scope: Commercial lager beers in the cited study

Note: Terms such as sharp, progressive, and rounded are descriptors from that study's own panel, not fixed categories applicable to every beer.

Differences in the hop acid and polyphenol profile were associated with differences in the temporal bitterness descriptors and intensity.
Limitations: The commercial product set and the panel's vocabulary may not generalize to every beer style.
Source: The impact of hop bitter acid and polyphenol profiles on the perceived bitterness of beer (Oladokun O; Tarrega A; James S; Smart K; Hort J; Cook D, 2016) · abstract checked
Show dataingredient-beer —has_bitterness_character_influenced_by→ "Hop bitter acid and polyphenol profile, and hopping strategy"
claim: clm-hop-profile-temporal / type: sensory / updated: 2026-08-30
beer shows a nonlinear relationship between: Bitterness Units (BU) and rated bitterness intensitysupported

Scope: More than 120 highly hopped commercial beer brands

Note: Model performance outside highly hopped beers has yet to be verified.

In strongly hopped beers, Bitterness Units (BU) predicted rated bitterness with a nonlinear response.
Limitations: Scope of application is strongly hopped commercial beers.
Source: Evaluation of Nonvolatile Chemistry Affecting Sensory Bitterness Intensity of Highly Hopped Beers (Hahn CD; Lafontaine SR; Pereira CB; Shellhammer TH, 2018) · abstract checked
Limits: The relationship between Bitterness Units (BU) and rated intensity modeled in highly hopped beers is further constrained by the finding that dry hopping raises IBU through the extraction of humulinones and polyphenols while removing iso-α-acids in the majority of the commercial beers surveyed. Therefore, even at the same nominal IBU, the composition behind the IBU input to this kind of model differs between dry-hopped and kettle-hopped beers.
Limitations: This is a cross-study inference; the source itself neither tests nor comments on the Hahn 2018 model. Abstract-level extraction; the magnitude of IBU or concentrations was not obtained.
Source: Toward Understanding the Bitterness of Dry-Hopped Beer (Parkin E; Shellhammer TH, 2017) · abstract checked
A review by an independent group states in writing, "It is important to note that bitterness is not a direct equivalent to IBU. In some cases, the value of IBU can increase disproportionately to the perceived bitterness level," making explicit the non-equivalence and non-proportionality between IBU and perceived bitterness. In the dry-hopping context, humulinones and polyphenols contaminate the IBU measurement, so a single linear correspondence from BU to perceived intensity does not hold — an overall judgment pointing the same direction as Hahn 2018's nonlinear finding.
Limitations: A review; it does not give a quantitative function (the shape of the nonlinearity) for the discrepancy. The description is mainly in the dry-hopped beer context.
Source: Effects of Dry-Hopping on Beer Chemistry and Sensory Properties - A Review (Klimczak K; Cioch-Skoneczny M; Duda-Chodak A, 2023) · full text checked
Context: In 16 conventionally hopped commercial lager brands, the relationship between the rank-rating bitterness intensity from 14 trained assessors and the HPLC-quantified concentration of 6 bitter compounds (iso-α-acids and their derivatives) was well modeled by PLS regression, with a correlation of 0.92. This shows a strong correspondence between compound concentration and perceived bitterness in the concentration range typical of conventional lagers, and functions as a scope limitation showing that the Hahn 2018 nonlinearity emerges in the highly hopped range. It also reports that time-intensity profiles showed large qualitative and quantitative individual differences among assessors.
Limitations: Abstract checked only (via a single retrieval route: a publisher-deposited abstract on OpenAlex). The 0.92 correlation is the PLS model's goodness of fit, not a test of linearity itself. Individual compound concentrations, not BU (IBU), are used as the explanatory variable.
Source: Relationships of Sensory Bitterness in Lager Beers to Iso-alpha-Acid Contents (Techakriengkrai I; Paterson A; Taidi B; Piggott JR, 2004) · full text checked
Limits: From an analysis of 34 commercial lager brands, 10 with differing compositions were selected for sensory evaluation. Beers high in polyphenols and hop acids were perceived as "harsh" and "progressive"; conventionally hopped beers as "sharp" and "instant"; and those using tetrahydro-iso-α-acids as "diminishing," "rounded," and "acidic" in bitterness — "The hopping strategy adopted by brewers impacts on the nature, temporal profile and intensity of bitterness perception in beer." This constrains the idea of a single BU-to-intensity function, in the direction that, even at the same level of bitter-compound content, intensity, character, and time course vary with what was used to make it bitter.
Limitations: Abstract checked only. A cross-study inference, not a direct test of the Hahn 2018 model. Individual intensity values and compound concentrations are not in the abstract.
Source: The impact of hop bitter acid and polyphenol profiles on the perceived bitterness of beer (Oladokun O; Tarrega A; James S; Smart K; Hort J; Cook D, 2016) · abstract checked
The correlation coefficients between lager beer sensory bitterness intensity (rank rating) and the concentration of each acid were: cohumulone 0.54, humulone 0.74, adhumulone 0.67, tetrahydrocohumulone -0.23, tetrahydrohumulone -0.01, and tetrahydroadhumulone 0.07 — limited for any single acid, while the multivariate (PLS) model reached 0.92.
Limitations: Full text checked. See the paper for sample size and panel composition.
Source: Relationships of Sensory Bitterness in Lager Beers to Iso-alpha-Acid Contents (Techakriengkrai I; Paterson A; Taidi B; Piggott JR, 2004) · full text checked
In regressions of Bitterness Units (BU) against the concentration of each bitter compound class, R² was 0.5911 for iso-α-acids alone, 0.7569 for α-acids, 0.8739 for α-acids and their conversion products, and 0.8904 for the total.
Limitations: The main text is behind a paywall and was not checked; only the Supporting Information was verified. This shows that BU is not a linear indicator of any single compound class, but this data does not address the relationship to sensory bitterness.
Source: Quantification of Hop-Derived Bitter Compounds in Beer Using Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (Teng CE; Wang YM; Li TH; Chen SF, 2024) · abstract checked
Show dataingredient-beer —has_nonlinear_relationship_between→ "Bitterness Units (BU) and rated bitterness intensity"
claim: clm-beer-bu-nonlinear / type: sensory / updated: 2026-08-30
beer — bitterness quality is reduced by: Dry hopping with hops of a storage index (HSI) above 0.4. Bitterness quality scored 4.9-5.0 on a 1-5 scale at HSI 0.3, and declined at higher HSIpreliminary

Scope: A finding specific to dry hopping (when hops with HSI > 0.4 are used). In kettle hopping, a sister study found no bitterness-quality problem at high HSI when boiled for at least 45 minutes

Note: Quality and intensity behave differently: quality declined monotonically, while measured BU peaked at an intermediate HSI in 2 of 3 cultivars. 10 assessors, one brewing trial per cell.

Bitterness quality scored highest with the freshest hops at HSI 0.3 (on a 1-5 scale: Celeia 4.9 +/- 0.21, Aurora 4.9 +/- 0.21, Styrian Wolf 5.0 +/- 0.16), and declined at higher HSI. The bitterness-intensity response was cultivar-dependent. The abstract states that beer brewed with hops above HSI 0.4 showed deviations in aroma and bitterness compared with beer made from fresh hops, and the source concludes that, since bitterness quality decreases as HSI rises, humulinone oxidation products could have a negative impact on the perceived bitterness of hops.
Limitations: 10 assessors and a single 1-5 quality scale. No statistical test for the decline in quality is cited here. The explanation attributing the decline to humulinone oxidation products is a mechanism proposed by the authors ('could have a negative impact'), not a measured causal verification.
Source: Impact of Hop Freshness on Dry Hopped Beer Quality (Rutnik K; Ocvirk M; Košir IJ, 2022) · full text checked
Limits: In a sister kettle-hopping study from the same group (the same 3 cultivars, HSI 0.3-0.7, the same panel design of 10 assessors), the effect of HSI on bitterness depended on boiling time: verbatim 'The quality of bitterness after 5 min of boiling decreased with increasing HSI' (Celeia at 5 min: 4.8 +/- 0.4 at HSI 0.3 versus 1.5 +/- 0.3 at HSI 0.6). However, verbatim 'If boiling is conducted for a long enough time (at least 45 min), then aged hops are not problematic' (regarding bitterness), and the abstract states 'The old hops were not problematic in terms of bitterness or early hopping time.' The kettle limit values were HSI 0.5 (Aurora, Celeia) and 0.6 (Styrian Wolf), against verbatim 'the limit for dry hopping at 0.4 for Aurora and Celeia and at 0.5 for Styrian Wolf.'
Limitations: Because this is the same laboratory as the dry-hopping study, it is not an independent replication but rather limits the scope of the claim (hop addition mode and boiling time). One brewing trial per cell.
Source: The Impact of Hop Freshness on Kettle-Hopped Beers (Rutnik K; Ocvirk M; Košir IJ, 2023) · full text checked
Show dataingredient-beer —has_bitterness_quality_reduced_by→ "Dry hopping with hops of a storage index (HSI) above 0.4. Bitterness quality scored 4.9-5.0 on a 1-5 scale at HSI 0.3, and declined at higher HSI"
claim: clm-hsi-reduces-bitterness-quality / type: sensory / updated: 2026-08-31
beer — perceived bitterness is affected by: The higher the alcohol content of a sample, the more temporally dominant bitterness and astringency were, particularly before swallowingsupported

Scope: TDS of 9 beers differing in alcohol content

Note: This is not a mechanistic claim that alcohol directly enhances bitterness perception. It includes concurrent differences among the beer groups.

The higher-alcohol group showed more dominant bitterness, and differences appeared especially in the time window spanning before and after swallowing (reaching significance at 23-45 seconds for regular beer and 26-41 seconds for low-alcohol beer). Astringency was most pronounced around swallowing in regular beer but did not reach significance.
Limitations: An observation that includes product differences beyond alcohol content. Does not indicate a mechanism.
Source: Exploring the flavor life cycle of beers with varying alcohol content (Missbach Benjamin; Majchrzak Dorota; Sulzner Raphael; Wansink Brian; Reichel Martin; Koenig Juergen, 2017) · full text checked
Show dataingredient-beer —has_perceived_bitterness_affected_by→ "The higher the alcohol content of a sample, the more temporally dominant bitterness and astringency were, particularly before swallowing"
claim: clm-beer-alcohol-temporal-bitter / type: sensory / updated: 2026-08-31
beer — sensory attribute: The official Yaho Brewing website, 「よなよなの里」 (in translation: "Yonayona no Sato"), shows Suiyobi no Neko at 11, Yona Yona Ale at 41, and Indo no Aooni at 62 as the IBU of its own beers, and states, for comparison, that the IBU of lager beer generally drunk in Japan is roughly around "20" (in translation: "20").contextual

Scope: An explanatory article on the official Yaho Brewing website, in the domain of Japanese craft beer (a differentiated-brand category)

Note: Source text: the official website states that the IBU of lager beer generally drunk in Japan is roughly around "20" (in translation: "20"), and that what creates a beer's 「苦味」 (in translation: "bitterness") is ... 「ホップ」 (in translation: "hops"); the component called 「α酸」 (in translation: "alpha acid") contained in hops is the source of the bitterness. Within the portfolio of this same differentiated (craft) brewer, IBU is deliberately varied from 11 to 62, an example in which the strength of bitterness is adjusted by each brand's positioning rather than by an industrial-versus-gourmet distinction.

Cites the company's own beers' IBU values (Suiyobi no Neko 11, Yona Yona Ale 41, Indo no Aooni 62), and gives the IBU of ordinary Japanese lager, for comparison, as 「大体20くらい」 (in translation: "roughly around 20"). Explains the origin of bitterness as hops' alpha acid.
Limitations: The source and measurement method for the IBU value of 'ordinary lager beer' are not stated explicitly in the body text (it is mentioned as a rough industry benchmark).
Source: ビールの表記の「IBU」ってなに?計測方法も解説します (ヤッホーブルーイング, 2026) · full text checked
Show dataingredient-beer —has_sensory_attribute→ "The official Yaho Brewing website, 「よなよなの里」 (in translation: "Yonayona no Sato"), shows Suiyobi no Neko at 11, Yona Yona Ale at 41, and Indo no Aooni at 62 as the IBU of its own beers, and states, for comparison, that the IBU of lager beer generally drunk in Japan is roughly around "20" (in translation: "20")."
claim: clm-w51-yoho-ibu-portfolio-vs-ordinary-lager / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-02

Culture (1)

beer — reported consumption share: About 69% of single-can sales of US craft beer were hop-forward (strongly bitter) styles, broken down as imperial IPA 26%, IPA 22%, hazy IPA 16%, and imperial hazy IPA 5%. In 12-can packs, IPA was the leading style by volume at 21%.contextual

Scope: The US craft beer market, per the Brewers Association's own analysis (based on NIQ data), as of 2025

Note: A self-published analysis article (2026-03-05) by a staff economist of the industry association Brewers Association. Counter-evidence to the generalization that 'mass production strips out bitterness' — bitterness-forward IPA-family styles still sit at the center of the US craft beer market.

About 69% of single-can sales were hop-forward styles (imperial IPA 26%, IPA 22%, hazy IPA 16%, imperial hazy IPA 5%). In 12-can packs, IPA led by volume at 21%.
Limitations: The source is the Brewers Association's own analysis article and is not connected to the raw NIQ data itself. The definition of the IPA-family group (including imperial IPA and hazy IPA) follows the article's own classification.
Source: Value Quest: 2025 Packaging Trends (Gacioch, Matt (Staff Economist, Brewers Association), 2026) · full text checked
Show dataingredient-beer —has_reported_consumption_share_of→ "About 69% of single-can sales of US craft beer were hop-forward (strongly bitter) styles, broken down as imperial IPA 26%, IPA 22%, hazy IPA 16%, and imperial hazy IPA 5%. In 12-can packs, IPA was the leading style by volume at 21%."
claim: clm-h10-brewers-assn-ipa-dominant-share / type: cultural / updated: 2026-09-02

↑ Top of page · ← Encyclopedia (English entries)