日本語版

tannins

compound class / compound-tannins

タンニン類

Diverse polyphenol compounds that can interact with proteins and other oral components.

Photographs (captions in Japanese)

茶園に整列したチャノキの緑の葉が接写されている写真

チャノキ(Camellia sinensis)の茶園での葉の接写。タンニン類はタンパク質等と相互作用しうる多様なポリフェノール化合物群で、代表的な給源であるチャノキの写真を採用した。

原料写っているもの: Camellia sinensis(チャノキ)部位・状態: 茶樹の葉

写真: Pro QueeNia/ CC BY-SA 4.0/ 原画像/ 台帳の原画像

写真の範囲と来歴

被写体の確認: 原典の記載による同定。ingredient-goishi-cha・ingredient-awa-bancha で使用した写真とは別ファイル(重複回避)。

掲載画像: Wikimedia Commons の原寸ファイル。苦味研究所では切り抜き・色調変更なし。 表示用には幅1200px上限のWebPを配信し、台帳の原画像は上のリンクから確認できます。

On this page (8 sections)
  1. Overview
  2. Sources for this overview (1)
  3. Topic hubs
  4. Follow the connections
  5. Related entries (10)
  6. Composition and content (1)
  7. Sensory (5)
  8. Safety and regulation (1)
↑

Reading the bitterness

Tannins are a general term for diverse polyphenol compounds that can bind to proteins and other substances in the mouth, and are a representative component that triggers astringency. Astringency is defined as a dry, tightening, narrowing sensation in the mouth that is felt when something containing astringent components is placed in the mouth. Proposed mechanisms include salivary proteins (particularly those rich in proline) binding to tannins and precipitating, tannins binding to epithelial cells or membranes on the mucous surface in the mouth, and involvement of the trigeminal nerve and mechanoreceptors, but the extent to which each contributes to astringency has not been settled. It is also pointed out that higher polymer-degree tannins tend to produce stronger astringency, while smaller molecules tend to produce stronger bitterness.

In fact, some tannins are also involved in bitterness itself. Pentagalloyl glucose, a type of hydrolyzable tannin, has been shown to activate bitter taste receptors TAS2R5 and TAS2R39 at very low concentrations (EC50 of 2.7 µM), and punicalagin, castalagin, and vescalagin, which are classified as ellagitannins, activate TAS2R7. Some of the procyanidins that form the basis of condensed tannins (dimers B1, B2, B3 and trimer C1) have been reported to be perceived as bitter only at higher concentrations (0.4-0.5 mM) than the concentration at which they are perceived as astringency (0.19-0.3 mM).

Sources for this overview

  1. Tannins in Food: Insights into the Molecular Perception of Astringency and Bitter Taste

    Soares S; Brandao E; Guerreiro C; Soares S; Mateus N; de Freitas V / 2020 / review / full text checked

    Checked for this overview: Definition of astringency, candidate mechanisms, and polymer-degree trend confirmed in body text / TAS2R activation by PGG and ellagitannins, and EC50 values confirmed in body text

Follow the connections

tannins →can elicit→ astringency →is not synonymous with→ bitterness

tannins →can contribute to→ bitterness →can be measured separately …→ astringency

persimmon tannin (kaki-tannin) →is a type of→ tannins

Structured claims — open a section to read each claim's confidence, evidence and limits

Composition and content (1)

persimmon tannin (kaki-tannin) is a type of tanninssupported

Note: Positions kaki-tannin as a condensed tannin (proanthocyanidin) that accumulates in the tannin cells of persimmon fruit.

States that genes involved in proanthocyanidin biosynthesis (the flavonoid synthesis pathway) are involved in the persimmon's tannin synthesis system, indicating that kaki-tannin is a condensed tannin (proanthocyanidin).
Source: 柿の起源と品種分化 (神崎真哉, 2016) · full text checked
Show datacompound-kaki-tannin —is_a_type_of→ compound-tannins
claim: clm-w40c-tannin-subtype-of-tannins / type: taxonomy / updated: 2026-09-02

Sensory (5)

tannins can elicit astringencyestablished

Scope: Food tannins

Note: Intensity and quality depend on structure, concentration, and matrix.

Verbatim: "Astringency is defined as dryness, tightening, and puckering sensations perceived in the oral cavity during the intake of astringent compounds." This review organizes the candidate mechanisms of tannin astringency: precipitation of salivary proteins (proline-rich proteins in particular) through tannin–protein interaction, tannin binding to oral epithelial cells and the mucosal pellicle, and involvement of the trigeminal nerve/mechanoreceptors. It also notes a structure-activity trend in which tannins with a higher mean degree of polymerization (such as procyanidin oligomers) tend toward stronger astringency, while lower-molecular-weight compounds tend toward stronger bitterness.
Limitations: The relative contribution of each mechanism — salivary protein precipitation, epithelial binding, and mechanoreceptors — is left unresolved within the review. Because astringency here spans a heterogeneous range of tannin structures, no single threshold or intensity value applies to the class as a whole.
Source: Tannins in Food: Insights into the Molecular Perception of Astringency and Bitter Taste (Soares S; Brandao E; Guerreiro C; Soares S; Mateus N; de Freitas V, 2020) · full text checked
Show datacompound-tannins —can_elicit→ sensation-astringent
claim: clm-tannins-astringent / type: sensory / updated: 2026-08-30
tannins can contribute to bitternesssupported

Scope: Some food tannins and polyphenols

Note: Not all tannins have the same receptor and sensory profile.

Verbatim: "Soares and colleagues have found that pentagalloylglucose (PGG), a hydrolysable tannin, activated TAS2R5 and TAS2R39 with a very low EC50 (2.7 uM)", and verbatim, "the ellagitannins punicalagin, castalagin, and vescalagin also activated TAS2R7." On the condensed-tannin precursors, verbatim: "Hufnagel and Hofmann reported that some of these procyanidins (dimers B1, B2, B3, and trimer C1) were perceived as bitter only at higher concentrations (0.4-0.5 mM) than astringent, perceived at lower concentrations (0.19-0.3 mM)."
Limitations: A review-level synthesis. The EC50 values come from cited cell-based receptor assays (including the authors' own primary research), and the procyanidin threshold comparison comes from the sensory study by Hufnagel and Hofmann. Receptor agonism and solution thresholds do not directly yield the bitterness intensity of a whole food, and the bitterness of high-degree-of-polymerization polymeric tannins has been studied less than that of monomers and oligomers.
Source: Tannins in Food: Insights into the Molecular Perception of Astringency and Bitter Taste (Soares S; Brandao E; Guerreiro C; Soares S; Mateus N; de Freitas V, 2020) · full text checked
Show datacompound-tannins —can_contribute_to→ sensation-bitter
claim: clm-tannins-bitter / type: sensory / updated: 2026-08-30
tannins — perceived bitterness is affected by: Degree of polymerization (a reversal in which monomers show bitterness > astringency, and polymers show astringency > bitterness).supported

Scope: 4 phenolic substances — catechin, gallic acid, grape-seed tannin, and tannic acid — added to white wine. Scalar rating and time-intensity methods with a trained panel (both increased linearly with concentration).

Note: For the polymers, tannic acid and grape-seed tannin, astringency ratings exceeded bitterness ratings, unlike their respective monomers (gallic acid and catechin). Conversely, for the monomers gallic acid and catechin, bitterness ratings exceeded astringency. Time to reach maximum intensity was slightly longer for bitterness than for astringency.

In the white-wine addition system, a reversal was observed: polymers (tannic acid, grape-seed tannin) showed astringency > bitterness, while monomers (gallic acid, catechin) showed bitterness > astringency.
Limitations: Confirmed only at the abstract level; details such as panel size are not given in the abstract.
Source: Astringency and bitterness of selected phenolics in wine (Robichaud JL; Noble AC, 1990) · abstract checked
Show datacompound-tannins —has_perceived_bitterness_affected_by→ "Degree of polymerization (a reversal in which monomers show bitterness > astringency, and polymers show astringency > bitterness)."
claim: clm-robichaud-1990-monomer-polymer-bitter-astringent-reversal / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-01
tannins — perceived bitterness is affected by: Degree of polymerization (bitterness decreases and astringency increases as it rises). 7 synthetic flavan-3-ol aqueous solutions made of catechin, epicatechin, and 3 dimers and 2 trimers derived from them (a model system, not wine itself).supported

Scope: Time-intensity method with a panel of 18 trained assessors (continuous recording from ingestion through 10 seconds after expectoration until the sensation disappeared).

Note: As the degree of polymerization rose, the maximum bitterness intensity and total duration fell, while maximum astringency intensity rose. Monomers were significantly more bitter than dimers, and dimers significantly more bitter than trimers. Astringency was weaker for the monomer than for the dimers and trimers (total duration showed no significant difference by degree of polymerization). Even among dimers made of the same catechin units, bitterness and astringency intensity varied by linkage position (4→6 versus 4→8 bonds) and by constituent unit (catechin versus epicatechin).

As the degree of polymerization rose (monomer → dimer → trimer), maximum bitterness intensity and duration fell while maximum astringency intensity rose. Intensity also varied by linkage position and constituent unit.
Limitations: Evaluated in a model aqueous system, not in wine itself.
Source: Bitterness and astringency of flavan-3-ol monomers, dimers and trimers (Peleg H; Gacon K; Schlich P; Noble AC, 1999) · abstract checked
Show datacompound-tannins —has_perceived_bitterness_affected_by→ "Degree of polymerization (bitterness decreases and astringency increases as it rises). 7 synthetic flavan-3-ol aqueous solutions made of catechin, epicatechin, and 3 dimers and 2 trimers derived from them (a model system, not wine itself)."
claim: clm-peleg-1999-polymerization-degree-bitter-down-astringent-up / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-01
tannins — combined bitter-astringent taste is affected by: pH (astringency only) and ethanol (both astringency and bitterness). Grape-seed-derived oligomeric tannins in a model wine solution.supported

Scope: 16 assessors. A comparison of conditions in which pH, ethanol concentration (including the wine range of 11–15%), and tartaric acid concentration were each manipulated independently.

Note: As ethanol concentration and pH rose, perceived astringency weakened. pH affected astringency only, whereas ethanol, at wine-range concentrations, contributed to perceived bitterness as well as astringency. Varying tartaric acid concentration at a constant pH affected neither astringency nor bitterness. Recorded as an asymmetric result showing that astringency and bitterness cannot be explained by a single mechanism alone.

pH affected astringency only, while ethanol concentration (including the wine range of 11–15%) contributed to bitterness as well as astringency. Tartaric acid concentration (at a constant pH) affected neither.
Limitations: A result from a model solution; reproducibility in actual wine still needs to be confirmed separately.
Source: Effect of pH, ethanol and acidity on astringency and bitterness of grape seed tannin oligomers in model wine solution (Fontoin H; Saucier C; Teissedre PL; Glories Y, 2008) · abstract checked
Show datacompound-tannins —has_bitter_astringency_affected_by→ "pH (astringency only) and ethanol (both astringency and bitterness). Grape-seed-derived oligomeric tannins in a model wine solution."
claim: clm-fontoin-2008-ph-ethanol-differential-effect / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-01

Safety and regulation (1)

tannins is used as the sensory reference stimulus for astringencycontextual

Scope: The same document, Part I, Table 1. Placed as a separate entry for astringency within the same table as the bitterness reference (quinine sulfate).

Note: A record that, within the same training table, the reference substance for bitterness (quinine sulfate) and the reference substance for astringency (tannic acid) are clearly separated as distinct rows.

Sets tannic acid at 1 g/L as the reference solution for astringency, placed on a separate row from the bitterness reference (quinine sulfate).
Limitations: Not a value indicating the astringency intensity of any particular wine — only a guideline concentration for training purposes.
Source: Document sur l'analyse sensorielle du vin (OIV Sous-commission Méthodes d'analyses, 2016) · full text checked
Show datacompound-tannins —is_used_as_sensory_reference_for→ sensation-astringent
claim: clm-oiv-tannic-acid-astringency-reference / type: regulatory / updated: 2026-09-01

↑ Top of page · ← Encyclopedia (English entries)