日本語版

astringency

sensation / sensation-astringent

渋味

Astringency is an oral mouthfeel often described through subqualities such as dryness, roughness, and puckering.

On this page (11 sections)
  1. Overview
  2. Sources for this overview (9)
  3. Topic hubs
  4. Other names
  5. Follow the connections
  6. Related entries (10)
  7. Sensory (18)
  8. Mechanism and receptors (2)
  9. How processing and cooking change it (1)
  10. Safety and regulation (2)
  11. Culture (2)
↑

Reading the bitterness

「渋味」 (in translation: "astringency") is described as a sensation distinct from bitterness: an oral feeling with several qualities, including dryness, roughness, and puckering. Multiple reviews distinguish it from bitterness, which is mediated by taste buds. The two can occur together and perception of one can affect perception of the other, making them easy to confuse when eating or drinking. Nevertheless, these reviews treat astringency as a distinct sensation, not as identical to bitterness.

Proposed mechanisms of astringency include reduced salivary lubrication, increased friction in the mouth, and responses from receptors beyond touch. It remains unresolved how much each mechanism contributes, and a single chemical or physical measure is described as insufficient to predict astringency intensity. For tannins, common sources of astringency, proposed mechanisms include binding to salivary proteins or oral mucosa and neural involvement. Higher-polymerization tannins also tend to produce stronger astringency, whereas smaller molecules tend toward stronger bitterness.

In brewed green tea, astringency is treated as a major feature separate from bitterness. One quantitative study found that its intensity correlated with concentrations of the catechin ECG and glycosides of myricetin and quercetin. A separate study of black tea, however, used taste-dilution methods to seek the principal causes of astringency and identified 14 flavonol glycosides rather than catechins, so the studies do not agree. A finding that longer extraction increases astringency has been confirmed only within the scope of a model experiment using oolong tea.

A study attempting to explain individual differences in astringency through recovery of salivary proteins after stimulation accounted for 33% and 29% of the differences for astringent substances dissolved in water, but those same measures could not predict astringency in solid test foods. A molecular-level study found that caffeine partly occupied binding sites on salivary proteins and thus weakened the astringency of the tea catechin EGCG, but it did not directly measure people’s actual perception. Astringency also has an entry in an international sensory-evaluation vocabulary standard, although the definition text has not been checked.

Sources for this overview

  1. Astringency and its sub-qualities: a review of astringency mechanisms and methods for measuring saliva lubrication

    Wang S; Smyth HE; Olarte Mantilla SM; Stokes JR; Smith PA / 2024 / review / full text checked

    Checked for this overview: Confirmed the classification of astringency as an oral tactile sensation distinct from bitterness. / Confirmed proposed mechanisms involving reduced lubrication, friction, and receptor responses. / Confirmed the limit that a single measurement does not predict astringency.

  2. Tannins in Food: Insights into the Molecular Perception of Astringency and Bitter Taste

    Soares S; Brandao E; Guerreiro C; Soares S; Mateus N; de Freitas V / 2020 / review / full text checked

    Checked for this overview: Confirmed that the two sensations can occur together and are easily confused. / Confirmed proposed tannin-binding mechanisms and the trend with degree of polymerization.

  3. Bitter and astringent substances in green tea: composition, human perception mechanisms, evaluation methods and factors influencing their formation

    Deng S; Zhang G; Olayemi Aluko O; Mo Z; Mao J; Zhang H; Liu X; Ma M; Wang Q; Liu H / 2022 / review / abstract checked

    Checked for this overview: Confirmed that astringency is treated as a major green-tea quality attribute separate from bitterness.

  4. Quantitative analyses of the bitterness and astringency of catechins from green tea

    Xu YQ; Zhang YN; Chen JX; Wang F; Du QZ; Yin JF / 2018 / journal article / abstract checked

    Checked for this overview: Confirmed the correlation of green-tea ECG with astringency at R2=0.79.

  5. Identification of the astringent taste compounds in black tea infusions by combining instrumental analysis and human bioresponse

    Scharbert S; Holzmann N; Hofmann T / 2004 / journal article / abstract checked

    Checked for this overview: Confirmed the conflicting black-tea result identifying flavonol glycosides as the main contributors.

  6. Exploring The Relative Astringency of Tea Catechins and Distinct Astringent Sensation of Catechins and Flavonol Glycosides via an In Vitro Assay Composed of Artificial Oil Bodies

    Liu CT; Tzen JTC / 2022 / journal article / full text checked

    Checked for this overview: Confirmed the association between extraction time and increased astringency in the oolong-tea model.

  7. Salivary protein levels as a predictor of perceived astringency in model systems and solid foods

    Fleming EE; Ziegler GR; Hayes JE / 2016 / journal article / full text checked

    Checked for this overview: Confirmed that salivary-protein recovery accounted for 30% of individual differences. / Confirmed that the same indicator failed to predict astringency in solid foods.

  8. Caffeine weakens the astringency of epigallocatechin gallate by inhibiting its interaction with salivary proteins

    Zhou Z; Ou M; Shen W; Jin W; Yang G; Huang W; Guo C / 2024 / journal article / abstract checked

    Checked for this overview: Confirmed a molecular mechanism by which caffeine weakens EGCG astringency.

  9. Sensory analysis — Vocabulary (ISO 5492:2008, incl. Amd 1:2016)

    International Organization for Standardization / 2008 / standard / full text checked

    Checked for this overview: Confirmed that an ISO international standard has a vocabulary entry for astringency.

Other names: astringence (fr)

Follow the connections

astringency →is not synonymous with→ bitterness →is reduced by→ sweetness

tannins →can elicit→ astringency

green tea infusion →— sensory attribute→ astringency

astringency →reduces taste preference for→ chokeberry →— sensory attribute→ bitterness

Hypotheses and recipe candidates for this entry are on the Japanese page.

Structured claims — open a section to read each claim's confidence, evidence and limits

Sensory (18)

astringency is not synonymous with bitternesssupported

Scope: How it is felt when eating or drinking food or beverages

Note: The two can occur together and each can affect how the other is felt, but bitterness as a taste and astringency as a dryness/roughness are recorded separately. / 2026-08-31: Calibration downgrade from established to supported, because the supporting evidence does not derive from a full-text check. Can be re-upgraded after a full-text check.

Organizes astringency not as the basic taste of bitterness but as an oral tactile sensation that includes dryness, roughness, and a puckering, tightening feel in the mouth.
Limitations: Whether dryness, roughness, and tightening are fully independent sensations remains unresolved.
Source: Astringency and its sub-qualities: a review of astringency mechanisms and methods for measuring saliva lubrication (Wang S; Smyth HE; Olarte Mantilla SM; Stokes JR; Smith PA, 2024) · full text checked
Context: Organizes multiple studies as showing that astringency and bitterness are felt together, with confusion arising because how one is felt affects the other. On that basis it distinguishes astringency, a tactile sensation of dryness, tightening, and puckering, from bitterness, a taste mediated through bitterness sensors.
Limitations: This review itself did not run an experiment separating the two sensations. Even in the underlying studies, cases of assessors confusing the two are recorded.
Source: Tannins in Food: Insights into the Molecular Perception of Astringency and Bitter Taste (Soares S; Brandao E; Guerreiro C; Soares S; Mateus N; de Freitas V, 2020) · full text checked
Show datasensation-astringent —is_not_synonymous_with→ sensation-bitter
claim: clm-astringent-distinct / type: sensory / updated: 2026-08-31
astringency is not fully predicted by A single chemical or physical measurementsupported

Scope: Instrumental prediction of human astringency

Note: A measurement generally captures only the mechanism it models.

Concludes that a single chemical or physical method can measure only a specific mechanism, and treating it as a complete predictor is merely idealistic.
Limitations: Extracted at the abstract level only.
Source: Astringency and its sub-qualities: a review of astringency mechanisms and methods for measuring saliva lubrication (Wang S; Smyth HE; Olarte Mantilla SM; Stokes JR; Smith PA, 2024) · full text checked
Epicatechin (EC) did not change the lubricity of the salivary lubricating film yet was perceived as astringent, while milk substantially lowered the lubricity of EGCG yet eased the perceived astringency. One example showing that a single physical index — the friction coefficient — cannot by itself explain the perception of astringency.
Limitations: Confirmed from the abstract only (full text not read).
Source: Astringency of tea catechins: More than an oral lubrication tactile percept (Rossetti D; Bongaerts JHH; Wantling E; Stokes JR; Williamson AM, 2009) · abstract checked
Show datasensation-astringent —is_not_fully_predicted_by→ "A single chemical or physical measurement"
claim: clm-astringent-single-measure-limit / type: sensory / updated: 2026-08-30
tannins can elicit astringencyestablished

Scope: Food tannins

Note: Intensity and quality depend on structure, concentration, and matrix.

Verbatim: "Astringency is defined as dryness, tightening, and puckering sensations perceived in the oral cavity during the intake of astringent compounds." This review organizes the candidate mechanisms of tannin astringency: precipitation of salivary proteins (proline-rich proteins in particular) through tannin–protein interaction, tannin binding to oral epithelial cells and the mucosal pellicle, and involvement of the trigeminal nerve/mechanoreceptors. It also notes a structure-activity trend in which tannins with a higher mean degree of polymerization (such as procyanidin oligomers) tend toward stronger astringency, while lower-molecular-weight compounds tend toward stronger bitterness.
Limitations: The relative contribution of each mechanism — salivary protein precipitation, epithelial binding, and mechanoreceptors — is left unresolved within the review. Because astringency here spans a heterogeneous range of tannin structures, no single threshold or intensity value applies to the class as a whole.
Source: Tannins in Food: Insights into the Molecular Perception of Astringency and Bitter Taste (Soares S; Brandao E; Guerreiro C; Soares S; Mateus N; de Freitas V, 2020) · full text checked
Show datacompound-tannins —can_elicit→ sensation-astringent
claim: clm-tannins-astringent / type: sensory / updated: 2026-08-30
green tea infusion — sensory attribute: astringencysupported

Scope: Brewed green tea

Note: Kept separate from bitterness even where the compounds driving the two overlap. / 2026-08-31: Calibrated down from established to supported, because the supporting evidence does not derive from a full-text check. May be re-upgraded after a full-text check.

Positions astringency as a main quality attribute of green tea, separate from bitterness.
Limitations: A broad review; preparation conditions vary.
Source: Bitter and astringent substances in green tea: composition, human perception mechanisms, evaluation methods and factors influencing their formation (Deng S; Zhang G; Olayemi Aluko O; Mo Z; Mao J; Zhang H; Liu X; Ma M; Wang Q; Liu H, 2022) · abstract checked
In the same quantitative study, the astringency of green tea infusion correlated highly with the concentration of ECG and flavonol glycosides (myricetin 3-O-galactoside and quercetin-3-O-rutinoside) (R2 = 0.7878, p < 0.01). Supported by a primary study that treats green tea's astringency quantitatively as an attribute on a separate axis from bitterness.
Limitations: Only the abstract was checked. The abstract does not state the astringency evaluation method (scale, etc.).
Source: Quantitative analyses of the bitterness and astringency of catechins from green tea (Xu YQ; Zhang YN; Chen JX; Wang F; Du QZ; Yin JF, 2018) · abstract checked
Show dataingredient-green-tea —has_sensory_attribute→ sensation-astringent
claim: clm-green-tea-astringent / type: sensory / updated: 2026-08-31
epicatechin gallate is correlated with astringencysupported

Scope: Green tea infusion in the cited quantitative study.

Note: Subject to interactions within the mixture and preparation conditions.

In the modeled green tea infusion, ECG concentration correlated with astringency.
Limitations: Correlation specific to this research.
Source: Quantitative analyses of the bitterness and astringency of catechins from green tea (Xu YQ; Zhang YN; Chen JX; Wang F; Du QZ; Yin JF, 2018) · abstract checked
Show datacompound-ecg —is_correlated_with→ sensation-astringent
claim: clm-ecg-astringent / type: sensory / updated: 2026-08-30
flavonol glycosidesastringency are correlated with supported

Scope: Selected myricetin and quercetin glycosides in the green tea research cited

Note: A single fixed astringent character should not be assigned to this broad class.

In modeled green tea infusion, selected flavonol glycosides correlated with astringency.
Limitations: This does not establish that all flavonol glycosides exhibit the same behavior.
Source: Quantitative analyses of the bitterness and astringency of catechins from green tea (Xu YQ; Zhang YN; Chen JX; Wang F; Du QZ; Yin JF, 2018) · abstract checked
Show datacompound-flavonol-glycosides —are_correlated_with→ sensation-astringent
claim: clm-flavonol-glycosides-astringent / type: sensory / updated: 2026-08-30
astringency has a standardized vocabulary entry in ISO 5492 sensory analysis vocabulary.contextual

Scope: International standard terminology concerning sensory attributes.

Note: The text of the definitions has not been reproduced. Full-text access is paid.

Context: ISO 5492 defines sensory-evaluation vocabulary, including terms for sensory properties, and is applicable across industries.
Limitations: Its scope was confirmed, but the individual definitions were not checked against the paywalled full text. The astringency entry and its definition have not been confirmed (2026-10-06; ISO's public browsing page was blocked by a bot check).
Source: Sensory analysis — Vocabulary (ISO 5492:2008, incl. Amd 1:2016) (International Organization for Standardization, 2008) · full text checked
Show datasensation-astringent —has_standardized_vocabulary_entry_in→ "ISO 5492 sensory analysis vocabulary."
claim: clm-astringent-iso-vocabulary / type: sensory / updated: 2026-08-30
tea catechins are main contributors to astringencycontested

Scope: Tea infusions. Asserted for green tea; contradicted for black tea.

Note: The green tea literature regards catechins as the main contributor to astringency, but a taste-dilution study on black tea found flavonol glycosides to be dominant instead. The matrix (green tea vs. black tea) and the method (correlation vs. dilution-to-threshold) differ.

States that catechins are the main contributors to the bitterness and astringency of green tea infusions, and that astringency correlates strongly with ECG and flavonol glycosides (R2 = 0.7878).
Limitations: Correlational only; the same abstract also suggests a role for flavonol glycosides.
Source: Quantitative analyses of the bitterness and astringency of catechins from green tea (Xu YQ; Zhang YN; Chen JX; Wang F; Du QZ; Yin JF, 2018) · abstract checked
Contradicts: In black tea, taste dilution identified 14 flavon-3-ol glycosides -- not catechins or theaflavins -- as the main contributors to astringency; the glycosides' thresholds were up to 190,000 times lower than EGCG's.
Limitations: The matrix (black tea vs. green tea) and method (dilution-to-threshold vs. correlation) differ, so the contradiction may partly reflect matrix and methodology rather than a true conflict.
Show datacompound-catechins —are_main_contributors_to→ sensation-astringent
claim: clm-catechins-main-tea-astringency / type: sensory / updated: 2026-08-30
astringencysalivary protein replenishment is partly predicted by supported

Scope: A study that evaluated samples of tannic acid or alum dissolved in water

Note: The individual differences explained by the degree to which salivary protein returned after stimulation were 33% and 29% — not a figure that explains all of how astringency is perceived.

The figure representing the degree to which salivary protein returned after stimulation related inversely to the astringency of tannic acid and alum dissolved in water, explaining 33% and 29% of individual differences.
Limitations: The individual differences explained were less than half, and this is not an experiment that directly proved that salivary change produces astringency.
Source: Salivary protein levels as a predictor of perceived astringency in model systems and solid foods (Fleming EE; Ziegler GR; Hayes JE, 2016) · full text checked
Limits: From the same salivary figures, the astringency of the solid test food could not be predicted.
Limitations: The relationship found in the aqueous solution cannot be made a rule for all foods.
Source: Salivary protein levels as a predictor of perceived astringency in model systems and solid foods (Fleming EE; Ziegler GR; Hayes JE, 2016) · full text checked
Show datasensation-astringent —is_partially_predicted_by→ concept-salivary-protein-replenishment
claim: clm-astringency-saliva-partial-predictor / type: sensory / updated: 2026-08-31
soyasaponin group A contributes to astringencysupported

Scope: Group A saponin fraction isolated from unprocessed soybean (sensory evaluation)

Note: Okubo (1988) gives the taste of saponin A in the legend of Figure 1 as 「強い苦味、弱い収斂味」 (in translation: "strong bitterness, weak astringency"). In Table 1 of the same report, group A saponins (from hypocotyls) are described as 「嫌悪感、苦味、収斂味、ざらつき」 (in translation: "aversive, bitter, astringent, gritty"), with no degree word on astringency. Bitterness and astringency are recorded as separate claims. The contribution to astringency is weak.

When isolated soybean group A saponins were subjected to sensory evaluation, they exhibited strong bitterness and weak astringency (the legend of Figure 1 reads 「サポニンA 強い苦味、弱い収斂味」 (in translation: "saponin A: strong bitterness, weak astringency"); Table 1 lists bitterness and astringency for group A saponins without degree words).
Limitations: The author notes that there was considerable individual variability in taste descriptions in the sensory evaluation.
Show datacompound-class-soyasaponin-group-a —contributes_to→ sensation-astringent
claim: clm-soy-group-a-saponin-astringent / type: sensory / updated: 2026-10-06
soy isoflavone glycosides contributes to astringencysupported

Scope: Isoflavone glycosides isolated from raw, unprocessed soybean (sensory test)

Isolated soybean isoflavonoid components (genistin, daidzin, etc.) are reported to show a weak astringent taste in the sensory test (Figure 1 legend).
Limitations: The author states that there was considerable individual variation in how the taste was described in the sensory test.
Show datacompound-class-soy-isoflavone-glycosides —contributes_to→ sensation-astringent
claim: clm-soy-isoflavone-glycoside-astringent / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-01
milk or oat drink addition can decrease astringencysupported

Scope: Laboratory conditions in which milk was added to an aqueous EGCG (gallated catechin) solution, using an oral-tribology system modeled on the salivary film.

Note: In the same experiment, milk instead substantially reduced the lubricity of the salivary lubricating film; relief of perceived astringency therefore cannot be explained by a decrease in the coefficient of friction alone. This was a result in an aqueous EGCG model system, not an experiment using a green-tea infusion or an actual matcha latte. The existing process-milk-addition entry describes adding cow’s milk or oat beverage to coffee; this claim has separate scope_text because it concerns tea catechins in a different context.

Milk reduced perceived astringency of an EGCG solution but instead substantially reduced salivary lubricity.
Limitations: Only the abstract was checked. The panel size, rating scale, and statistical significance remain unverified (the full text was not read). The samples were not green-tea infusions or actual matcha lattes.
Source: Astringency of tea catechins: More than an oral lubrication tactile percept (Rossetti D; Bongaerts JHH; Wantling E; Stokes JR; Williamson AM, 2009) · abstract checked
Context: Compared with gelatin, the whey protein β-lactoglobulin reacted less with tannic acid and removed fewer catechins (different kinds of milk protein bind to polyphenols to different extents).
Limitations: The subject was red wine (grape tannins), not an experiment on catechins in green tea or matcha. This serves as indirect evidence that the degree of astringency reduction by milk proteins may not be the same across food systems.
Source: Astringency reduction in red wine by whey proteins (Jauregi P; Olatujoye JB; Cabezudo I; Frazier RA; Gordon MH, 2016) · abstract checked
Show dataprocess-milk-addition —can_decrease→ sensation-astringent
claim: clm-milk-mitigates-egcg-astringency / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-02
blackcurrant — sensory attribute: astringencysupported

Scope: Generic descriptive analysis of blackcurrant juices and press-residue fractions prepared by various processing and fractionation methods.

Note: Regardless of processing, sourness and puckering astringency are reported as the strongest sensory attributes in the juice. Sugars and acids are mainly in juice fractions and phenolic compounds mainly in press-residue fractions.

Most sugars and acids were localized in juice, most phenolic compounds in press residue. Juice predominated for many sensory attributes, but extracts produced by ethanol or supercritical-fluid extraction, rather than juice, were perceived as the most astringent.
Limitations: The publisher's site returned 403, so the original full text was not checked. This relies on summary excerpts through a search engine.
Source: Orosensory Profiles and Chemical Composition of Black Currant (Ribes nigrum) Juice and Fractions of Press Residue (Mari Sandell; Oskar Laaksonen; Riikka Järvinen; Nina Rostiala; Terhi Pohjanheimo; Katja Tiitinen; Heikki Kallio, 2009) · abstract checked
Show dataingredient-blackcurrant —has_sensory_attribute→ sensation-astringent
claim: clm-blackcurrant-astringent-sour-dominant / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-02
cranberry — sensory attribute: astringencysupported

Scope: The same evaluation, rating 6 attributes: sweetness, bitterness, sourness, astringency, thickness, and cranberry flavor.

Note: Within the same descriptive evaluation as bitterness, astringency was measured and reported simultaneously as an independent attribute.

It was defined and rated as an independent attribute alongside bitterness: "Attributes of interest included sweetness, bitterness, sourness, astringency, thickness, cranberry flavor".
Show dataingredient-cranberry —has_sensory_attribute→ sensation-astringent
claim: clm-cranberry-unsweetened-juice-astringent / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-02
chokeberry — sensory attribute: astringencysupported

Scope: The same panel as above.

Note: Astringency was rated as an independent attribute in the same descriptive panel as bitterness.

The statement "participants sampled and rated the intensities of sweetness, sourness, saltiness, bitterness, astringency, and liking/disliking" records that astringency was rated as a separate attribute.
Source: Characterizing and improving the sensory and hedonic responses to polyphenol-rich aronia berry juice (Valerie B. Duffy; Shristi Rawal; Jeeha Park; Mark H. Brand; Mastaneh Sharafi; Bradley W. Bolling, 2016) · full text checked
Show dataingredient-aronia —has_sensory_attribute→ sensation-astringent
claim: clm-aronia-juice-astringent-attribute / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-02
astringency reduces taste preference for chokeberrysupported

Scope: Correlation analysis of ratings of overall liking in the same study.

Note: The study reports that liking correlated strongly and primarily with perceived sweetness intensity (ρ=0.96), while astringency correlated negatively with liking. The correlation between bitterness and liking cannot be confirmed from this abstract, so this claim records only the astringency correlation.

The study reports that liking correlated strongly with perceived sweetness intensity (ρ=0.96), while astringency correlated negatively with liking. Bitterness did not correlate significantly with chemical constituents.
Limitations: A direct correlation coefficient for bitterness and liking cannot be confirmed from this abstract.
Source: Characterizing and improving the sensory and hedonic responses to polyphenol-rich aronia berry juice (Valerie B. Duffy; Shristi Rawal; Jeeha Park; Mark H. Brand; Mastaneh Sharafi; Bradley W. Bolling, 2016) · full text checked
Show datasensation-astringent —reduces_taste_preference_for→ ingredient-aronia
claim: clm-aronia-astringency-reduces-liking / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-02
lingonberry — sensory attribute: astringencysupported

Scope: Same as above.

Note: Astringency is also listed in the same description as bitterness and sourness.

Astringency is described alongside bitterness and sourness as a characteristic of unsweetened juice.
Limitations: The publisher’s full text was not obtained; this is based on a quotation reached through a search engine.
Source: Consumption of lingonberries by TAS2R38 genotype and sensory quality of texture-designed lingonberry samples (Mari Sandell; Ulla Hoppu; Saara Lundén; Mari Salminen; Tuuli Puolimatka; Oskar Laaksonen; Kirsi Laitinen; Anu Hopia, 2015) · abstract checked
Show dataingredient-lingonberry —has_sensory_attribute→ sensation-astringent
claim: clm-lingonberry-unsweetened-juice-astringent / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-02
melanoidins — sensory attribute: astringencysupported

Scope: Linne et al. 2025; 9 trained panelists (6 women, 3 men, aged 23–47); same/different judgments with confidence ratings; 27 evaluations per sample; nose clips worn.

Note: F9.6.4 is a brown, condensed-phenolic-dominated complex fraction obtained by multistep fractionation of the fraction below 5 kDa; the authors describe it as melanoidins or their precursors. It is not a purified single substance. The free descriptions were drying/astringent, not a measurement of bitterness.

When 7.9 mg/L was added to low-body coffee containing 7.8 mg/L of F9.6.4 to reach a final concentration of 15.7 mg/L, it was discriminated from the control at an R-index of 69.5% (p≤0.01). The free descriptions were drying and astringent.
Limitations: This is a brown, condensed-phenolic-dominated complex fraction that the authors position as melanoidins or their precursors, not a purified single substance. The reconstitution used a single low-body coffee. This is a discrimination probability, not an astringency intensity value, and it does not measure bitterness either. The Methods section gives the reconstitution control as 7.8 mg/L, but the HB/LB concentration description just before the Results gives 15.7/7.9 mg/L, a 0.1 mg/L discrepancy in notation. The claim adopts the Methods setting.
Source: Chemical characterization and sensory evaluation of a phenolic-rich melanoidin isolate contributing to coffee astringency (Brianne M. Linne; Edisson Tello; Christopher T. Simons; Devin G. Peterson, 2025) · full text checked
Show datacompound-class-melanoidins —has_sensory_attribute→ sensation-astringent
claim: clm-melanoidins-coffee-fraction-astringency / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-16

Mechanism and receptors (2)

astringency — currently proposed mechanisms: Loss of salivary lubrication, increased oral friction, and non-tactile receptor responses are among the mechanisms proposed.supported

Scope: Current review literature

Note: The relative role of each mechanism, and of the proposed subqualities, remains unresolved.

Reports evidence of non-tactile receptor responses in addition to reduced lubrication and friction.
Limitations: The relative contribution of each mechanism remains unresolved.
Source: Astringency and its sub-qualities: a review of astringency mechanisms and methods for measuring saliva lubrication (Wang S; Smyth HE; Olarte Mantilla SM; Stokes JR; Smith PA, 2024) · full text checked
Show datasensation-astringent —has_currently_proposed_mechanisms→ "Loss of salivary lubrication, increased oral friction, and non-tactile receptor responses are among the mechanisms proposed."
claim: clm-astringent-multiple-mechanisms / type: mechanism / updated: 2026-08-30
caffeine can decrease astringencypreliminary

Scope: In an EGCG/caffeine/saliva model, the astringency of EGCG when caffeine partially occupied EGCG binding sites on salivary proteins

Note: Assessed by molecular docking, ITC, and salivary rheology. Perceived astringency was inferred from salivary film structure; the abstract reports no human panel data.

Caffeine partially occupied EGCG binding sites on salivary proteins, inhibited EGCG-salivary protein interactions, altered the elastic network structure of the salivary film, and thereby reduced astringency.
Limitations: Astringency reduction was inferred from physicochemical endpoints. The abstract reports no human sensory panel data.
Source: Caffeine weakens the astringency of epigallocatechin gallate by inhibiting its interaction with salivary proteins (Zhou Z; Ou M; Shen W; Jin W; Yang G; Huang W; Guo C, 2024) · abstract checked
Show datacompound-caffeine —can_decrease→ sensation-astringent
claim: clm-caffeine-weakens-egcg-astringency / type: mechanism / updated: 2026-08-30

How processing and cooking change it (1)

infusion time can increase astringencypreliminary

Scope: Tea infusions in an artificial oil-body study.

Note: Human sensory confirmation and details of the extraction conditions are needed.

3 g of oolong leaves were added to 150 mL of boiling water, held in a 70 °C water bath, and sampled every 10 minutes through 40 minutes. Longer extraction increased catechin content and model-estimated astringency. From 10 to 40 minutes, EGCG and ECG rose 107% and 145%, significantly more than the 77% and 65% increases for EGC and EC. The authors wrote "tea astringency was elevated exponentially, rather than proportionally" because galloylated catechins increased disproportionately.
Limitations: Only one oolong tea and 70 °C were tested; the result cannot be generalized across temperatures or tea types. Astringency was estimated by an AOB model, not measured for intensity by a human panel.
Show dataprocess-brewing-time —can_increase→ sensation-astringent
claim: clm-brewing-time-astringent / type: processing / updated: 2026-08-30

Safety and regulation (2)

bitterness can be measured separately from astringencycontextual

Scope: OIV's ‘Sensory Analysis of Wine’ document (March 2016), Part I b), the section on tests for judging sensory acuity. Covers the sensory panel training program for grapes and grape-derived beverages (moûts, vins et autres boissons d'origine vitivinicole).

Note: The same section lists the five basic tastes to be checked in stimulus-detection training as ‘sweet, sour, salty, umami, bitter,’ with astringency (astringence) appended alongside it in a separate category, as "ainsi que" (in addition). The document’s own opening Avertissement states that it has not gone through the member-state resolution review procedure and "cannot be treated as an OIV resolution," being a subcommittee consensus document instead — so this claim is recorded as a record of institutional positioning, not a claim of established scientific consensus.

Lists the five basic tastes to be confirmed in stimulus-detection training as sweet, sour, salty, umami, and bitter, and appends astringency alongside them, in addition (in a separate category).
Limitations: The document itself states that it has not gone through the procedure for an OIV resolution and is a consensus document.
Source: Document sur l'analyse sensorielle du vin (OIV Sous-commission Méthodes d'analyses, 2016) · full text checked
Show datasensation-bitter —can_be_measured_separately_from→ sensation-astringent
claim: clm-oiv-basic-taste-bitter-astringent-separate / type: regulatory / updated: 2026-09-01
tannins is used as the sensory reference stimulus for astringencycontextual

Scope: The same document, Part I, Table 1. Placed as a separate entry for astringency within the same table as the bitterness reference (quinine sulfate).

Note: A record that, within the same training table, the reference substance for bitterness (quinine sulfate) and the reference substance for astringency (tannic acid) are clearly separated as distinct rows.

Sets tannic acid at 1 g/L as the reference solution for astringency, placed on a separate row from the bitterness reference (quinine sulfate).
Limitations: Not a value indicating the astringency intensity of any particular wine — only a guideline concentration for training purposes.
Source: Document sur l'analyse sensorielle du vin (OIV Sous-commission Méthodes d'analyses, 2016) · full text checked
Show datacompound-tannins —is_used_as_sensory_reference_for→ sensation-astringent
claim: clm-oiv-tannic-acid-astringency-reference / type: regulatory / updated: 2026-09-01

Culture (2)

astringency — etymology of the name: The Japanese word 「渋い」 (in translation: “shibui, astringent”) is traced to the Muromachi-period adjective 「渋し」 (in translation: “shibushi”). The Revised Edition of the Nihon Kokugo Daijiten defines one of its senses as 「渋柿をかじったような、舌をしびれさせるような味である」 (in translation: “a taste like that of biting into an astringent persimmon, that numbs the tongue”), and cites, as its earliest recorded usage, a line from a Muromachi-period kyogen play: 「さればこそしぶいが一定じゃ、そうじてしぶがきをくふては、うそがふかれぬ」 (in translation: “That's exactly why it is shibui — indeed, eating an astringent persimmon puckers the mouth so that one cannot whistle.”)contextual

Note: Kotobank (Revised Edition of the Nihon Kokugo Daijiten). A record of the fact that the Japanese taste word 「渋い」 (in translation: “shibui”) is itself defined with the astringent persimmon as its reference point.

The Revised Edition of the Nihon Kokugo Daijiten defines the taste-related meaning of 「渋」 (in translation: “shibu, astringent”) as 「渋柿をかじったような、舌をしびれさせるような味である」 (in translation: “a taste like that of biting into an astringent persimmon, that numbs the tongue”). As its earliest recorded usage, it cites a line from a Muromachi-period kyogen play: 「さればこそしぶいが一定じゃ、そうじてしぶがきをくふては、うそがふかれぬ」 (in translation: “That's exactly why it is shibui — indeed, eating an astringent persimmon puckers the mouth so that one cannot whistle.”)
Limitations: This is an automated extraction via the aggregator site Kotobank, not a direct confirmation of the original Nihon Kokugo Daijiten (the print edition or original database).
Source: 渋い(コトバンク項目、精選版日本国語大辞典ほか収録) (小学館(精選版日本国語大辞典)) · full text checked
Show datasensation-astringent —has_name_etymology→ "The Japanese word 「渋い」 (in translation: “shibui, astringent”) is traced to the Muromachi-period adjective 「渋し」 (in translation: “shibushi”). The Revised Edition of the Nihon Kokugo Daijiten defines one of its senses as 「渋柿をかじったような、舌をしびれさせるような味である」 (in translation: “a taste like that of biting into an astringent persimmon, that numbs the tongue”), and cites, as its earliest recorded usage, a line from a Muromachi-period kyogen play: 「さればこそしぶいが一定じゃ、そうじてしぶがきをくふては、うそがふかれぬ」 (in translation: “That's exactly why it is shibui — indeed, eating an astringent persimmon puckers the mouth so that one cannot whistle.”)"
claim: clm-w40c-shibui-etymology / type: cultural / updated: 2026-09-02
astringency is presented as: In the thesaurus entry for 「渋い」 (in translation: “astringent”) in the Digital Daijisen, 「苦い」 (in translation: “bitter”) and 「ほろ苦い」 (in translation: “mildly bitter”) are listed as synonyms.contextual
In the Digital Daijisen's thesaurus entry for 「渋い」 (in translation: “astringent”), 「苦い」 (in translation: “bitter”), 「ほろ苦い」 (in translation: “mildly bitter”) and others are listed as synonyms.
Limitations: This is an automated extraction via Kotobank, not a direct confirmation of the original Digital Daijisen display.
Source: 渋い(コトバンク項目、精選版日本国語大辞典ほか収録) (小学館(精選版日本国語大辞典)) · full text checked
Show datasensation-astringent —is_presented_as→ "In the thesaurus entry for 「渋い」 (in translation: “astringent”) in the Digital Daijisen, 「苦い」 (in translation: “bitter”) and 「ほろ苦い」 (in translation: “mildly bitter”) are listed as synonyms."
claim: clm-w40c-shibui-nigai-thesaurus-juxtaposition / type: cultural / updated: 2026-09-02

↑ Top of page · ← Encyclopedia (English entries)