日本語版

dry hopping

process / process-dry-hopping

ドライホッピング

Adding hops to beer after fermentation or during cold fermentation, rather than to boiling wort. It does not involve isomerization of α-acids.

On this page (7 sections)
  1. Overview
  2. Sources for this overview (4)
  3. Topic hubs
  4. Follow the connections
  5. Related entries (10)
  6. Mechanism and receptors (1)
  7. How processing and cooking change it (6)
↑

Reading the bitterness

Dry hopping adds hops to beer after fermentation or during cold maturation, rather than at the wort-boiling stage. Because there is no boiling, α-acids do not undergo isomerization into iso-α-acids, the main source of bitterness. The process is often described as transferring hop aroma alone after fermentation, but studies show that the chemical composition of beer bitterness changes as well.

In dry-hopped beer, IBU (International Bitterness Units), a common bitterness indicator, can rise. Yet in a study of 15 commercial beers before and after dry hopping, total iso-α-acid concentration instead fell in more than half. In an experiment dry-hopping an unhopped beer at 0–16 grams per liter for 0–72 hours, the IBU increase was attributed to extraction of humulinones (oxidized α-acids) and, in some cases, polyphenols. A review by another group also supports this divergence in directions and estimates humulinone bitterness at about 66% (±13%) of iso-α-acid bitterness.

Dry hopping was once considered not to contribute to bitterness because α-acid isomerization does not occur. However, a study examining hop freshness concluded that humulinones were a principal source of bitterness in dry-hopped beer. They increased during dry hopping but began to decline as oxidation progressed further after hop storage condition passed a certain threshold. An IBU value therefore cannot be read directly as a measure of iso-α-acid content.

Beer that is dry hopped after fermentation, because the wort is not boiled, tends to let hop-derived constituents transfer more directly, giving a strong aroma; bitterness felt in the beer overall, however, is described as weaker than in kettle-hopped beer. Two reasons are given for why conversion into iso-α-acids progresses poorly: alpha acids have low solubility in water, so much of it remains undissolved, and the temperature during dry hopping is not high enough for thermal isomerization to occur.

In dynamic (agitated) dry hopping used in US commercial brewing, the target dosage is described as 500-800 g/hL; exceeding this saturates the environment with hop oils, and extraction efficiency per unit dosage is reported to drop noticeably instead. In static dry hopping, there is also a report that around 24 hours at a process temperature of about 13.3-15.0°C is enough for an average of 75% of humulinones to transfer.

As a concrete numerical example, in a primary study that dry hopped Cascade hops at a dosage equivalent to 386.54 g/hL for 3 days at 16°C, iso-α-acid concentration is reported to have fallen from 51 mg/L to 32 mg/L, while both humulinones and alpha acids increased from below the detection limit to 13 mg/L. In another experiment where Cascade hops were dry hopped at 1.43 g/L, polyphenol concentration increased significantly over the control from about 2 hours after the start of dry hopping, but did not increase uniformly over time: it dropped below the control concentration once around 24 hours, then increased again over the final 3 days.

Sources for this overview

  1. Impact of Dry Hopping on Beer Flavor Stability

    Titus BM; Lerno LA; Beaver JW; Byrnes NK; Heymann H; Oberholster A / 2021 / journal article / full text checked

    Checked for this overview: Checked the description of adding hop aroma after fermentation and the finding that more than aroma changes. / Basis for the behavior in which polyphenols increase significantly at 2 hours with 1.43 g/L dry hopping, drop once at 24 hours, then increase again over the final 3 days

  2. Toward Understanding the Bitterness of Dry-Hopped Beer

    Parkin E; Shellhammer TH / 2017 / journal article / abstract checked

    Checked for this overview: Checked addition rates, contact times, rising IBU, and falling iso-α-acids in 15 commercial beers. / Checked the description of humulinones as potential contributors to dry-hopped beer bitterness.

  3. Effects of Dry-Hopping on Beer Chemistry and Sensory Properties - A Review

    Klimczak K; Cioch-Skoneczny M; Duda-Chodak A / 2023 / review / full text checked

    Checked for this overview: Checked the convergence of sources on the opposing trends and the estimate of 66±13% relative bitterness for humulinones. / Basis for the US standard dosage of 500-800 g/hL and the drop in extraction efficiency above it / Basis for the statement that an average of 75% of humulinones transfer at 24 hours and 13.3-15.0°C / Basis for the numerical example of iso-α-acids 51→32 mg/L and humulinones/alpha acids 0→13 mg/L at 386.54 g/hL, 3 days, 16°C

  4. Impact of Hop Freshness on Dry Hopped Beer Quality

    Rutnik K; Ocvirk M; Košir IJ / 2022 / journal article / full text checked

    Checked for this overview: Checked the earlier view that dry hopping was considered not to contribute bitterness and the conclusion about humulinone increase and decline. / Basis for the contrast that aroma is stronger and bitterness weaker compared with kettle hopping / Basis for the reasons (solubility and temperature) why isomerization yield is low

Follow the connections

dry hopping →increases→ bitterness units (BU / IBU)

humulinones →is extracted into beer by→ dry hopping

dry hopping →differs from→ kettle hopping →contributes to→ bitterness

Structured claims — open a section to read each claim's confidence, evidence and limits

Mechanism and receptors (1)

dry hopping — currently proposed mechanisms: Two reasons have been proposed for the low isomerization yield into iso-α-acids: the low solubility of alpha acids, and that the temperature does not become high enough to bring about thermal isomerizationpreliminary

Scope: Discussion of beer dry hopped with 3 hop varieties (Celeia, Aurora, Styrian Wolf) at 5 HSI levels

Note: The authors adopt the mechanistic explanation from another source; this is not direct verification original to this study. It is not an experiment that quantitatively separates the respective contributions of solubility and temperature.

'The isomerisation yield of iso-alpha acids is low for two reasons. One is that the solubility of alpha acids is relatively low, so a greater share remains undissolved, and the other is that the temperatures in dry hopping are not high enough for the thermal isomerisation of alpha acids to iso-alpha acids [24].' Confirmed this statement.
Limitations: This is not an experiment that quantitatively separates the respective contributions of solubility and temperature. It is the adoption of an explanation from cited reference [24], not the authors' own measurement.
Source: Impact of Hop Freshness on Dry Hopped Beer Quality (Rutnik K; Ocvirk M; Košir IJ, 2022) · full text checked
Show dataprocess-dry-hopping —has_currently_proposed_mechanisms→ "Two reasons have been proposed for the low isomerization yield into iso-α-acids: the low solubility of alpha acids, and that the temperature does not become high enough to bring about thermal isomerization"
claim: clm-dryhop-iaa-isomerization-mechanism / type: mechanism / updated: 2026-09-15

How processing and cooking change it (6)

dry hopping increases bitterness units (BU / IBU)supported

Scope: Pilot-scale dry hopping of a hop-free ale (0-16 g/L, 0-72 h), and a survey of 15 Pacific Northwest commercial beer brands sampled before and after dry hopping

Note: The 2 halves move in opposite directions: the conventional IBU proxy rises while the compound class it is supposed to stand in for falls. Central counter-evidence against treating IBU as a reading of iso-α-acids.

A trained sensory panel quantified the increase in bitterness when a hop-free ale was dry-hopped at 0-16 g/L over 0-72 h, alongside IBU and hop acid/polyphenol measurements. The increase in beer bitterness (IBU) from dry hopping was attributed to the extraction of humulinones and, in some cases, polyphenols. A parallel survey of 15 commercial beer brands sampled before and after dry hopping found a decrease in total iso-α-acid concentration in the majority of samples tested, showing that the dry-hopping process can remove iso-α-acids from beer.
Limitations: Abstract-level extraction. The number of panelists, magnitude of IBU, and iso-α-acid concentration are not given in the abstract, nor are sensory results corresponding to the commercial beer survey reported. The abstract as a whole still regards iso-α-acids as the main contributor to beer bitterness; this is a limitation on the IBU proxy, not a replacement of iso-α-acids.
Source: Toward Understanding the Bitterness of Dry-Hopped Beer (Parkin E; Shellhammer TH, 2017) · abstract checked
A review by an independent group (the Kraków University of Agriculture) synthesizes reports from multiple labs, stating, "A decrease in iso-α-acids, and a concomitant increase in α-acids, humulinones, and polyphenols, which are extracted from hops during the process, are well documented in the literature." It cites adsorption onto the hop material (citing demonstrations by Oladokun et al.) as the mechanism for the iso-α-acid decrease, names humulinones as "the main factors responsible for the increase in perceived bitterness in beers after the dry-hopping process," and gives their relative bitterness as 66% (±13%) of iso-α-acids. This shows that the two-directional movement reported by Parkin 2017 — IBU rising while iso-α-acids fall with dry hopping — is reproduced across the literature as a whole.
Limitations: A review, not new primary data. Many of the cited primary sources are from the Shellhammer/OSU lineage (the same lab as Parkin), so this does not substitute for a fully independent primary replication, but it does show convergence of reports across multiple countries and labs.
Source: Effects of Dry-Hopping on Beer Chemistry and Sensory Properties - A Review (Klimczak K; Cioch-Skoneczny M; Duda-Chodak A, 2023) · full text checked
Context: Brands inferred to be dry-hopped (inferred from humulinone detection: O, Q, AA, T, V) showed high polyphenol and humulinone concentrations, e.g., TPC>250 mg/L and up to 3 mg/L, and were described sensorially as "harsh" and "progressive" in bitterness. It states of humulinones, "a recent report by Hopsteiner suggested that humulinones are approximately 65% as bitter as iso-α-acids" (citing Steiner, 2015).
Limitations: Whether dry hopping was used is an inference not confirmed with the manufacturer. The primary source for the 65% relative bitterness of humulinones is an industry report (Hopsteiner, Steiner 2015), which is close to the "66% (±13%)" cited in the Klimczak 2023 review used elsewhere in this evidence, but both may trace back to the same primary industry report, so this cannot be called a fully independent replication (needs checking).
Source: The impact of hop bitter acid and polyphenol profiles on the perceived bitterness of beer (Oladokun O; Tarrega A; James S; Smart K; Hort J; Cook D, 2016) · full text checked
As an example of a primary study (Maye and Smith) summarized in the review, it is recorded that when Cascade hops were dry hopped at 1 lb./bbl. (equivalent to 386.54 g/hL) for 3 days at 16°C, iso-α-acid concentration fell from 51 mg/L to 32 mg/L, while alpha acid and humulinone concentrations both increased from below the detection limit to 13 mg/L.
Limitations: These are figures from a primary study (Maye and Smith) cited by the review; this entry has not checked the primary paper itself. This is a single example under one dosage, contact time, and temperature condition, and cannot be generalized.
Source: Effects of Dry-Hopping on Beer Chemistry and Sensory Properties - A Review (Klimczak K; Cioch-Skoneczny M; Duda-Chodak A, 2023) · full text checked
Show dataprocess-dry-hopping —increases→ concept-bitterness-units
claim: clm-dry-hopping-raises-ibu-lowers-iaa / type: processing / updated: 2026-08-30
humulinones is extracted into beer by dry hoppingsupported

Scope: Dry-hopped beer in a pilot-scale study, a survey of 15 commercial brands, and a hop-freshness trial across 3 varieties

While iso-α-acids were the main contributor to beer bitterness overall, humulinones (oxidized α-acids) and polyphenols were also potentially significant contributors to bitterness, especially in strongly dry-hopped beers, and the IBU increase from dry hopping was attributed to the extraction of humulinones.
Limitations: Abstract-level extraction. The phrase 'potentially significant' is the authors' own hedge and is preserved here as well. The abstract reports no omission/addition test with isolated compounds.
Source: Toward Understanding the Bitterness of Dry-Hopped Beer (Parkin E; Shellhammer TH, 2017) · abstract checked
The introduction states, 'For a long time, dry hopping was not considered to contribute to bitterness, since no isomerisation of alpha acids occurs,' and states that humulinones are oxygenation products of α-acids, that their concentration increases during hop storage, and that they carry approximately 66% of the bitterness of iso-α-acids. The conclusion states, 'In dry hopped beers, the main source of bitterness is humulinones, which are increasing and, at a certain HSI, started to drop; this is due to the further oxidation of humulinones to oxidation products.'
Limitations: The figure '66% of the bitterness of iso-α-acids' and its historical framing are cited from prior literature within this paper's introduction, not measured in this study, so it is recorded as context and not promoted to a claim. The description 'main source of bitterness' is the authors' conclusion about dry-hop-only beers and is not generalized to kettle-hopped beers.
Source: Impact of Hop Freshness on Dry Hopped Beer Quality (Rutnik K; Ocvirk M; Košir IJ, 2022) · full text checked
The review writes 「静置型(static)のドライホッピングでは、24時間で平均75%のフムリノンが13.3-15.0°Cの工程温度で抽出されるのに十分」 (in translation: "in static dry hopping, 24 hours is sufficient for an average of 75% of humulinones to be extracted at a process temperature of 13.3-15.0°C") (citing Lafontaine and Shellhammer).
Limitations: These are figures from a primary study (Lafontaine and Shellhammer) cited by the review; this entry has not checked the primary paper itself. They cannot be generalized to dynamic (agitated) dry hopping (the authors themselves specify static).
Source: Effects of Dry-Hopping on Beer Chemistry and Sensory Properties - A Review (Klimczak K; Cioch-Skoneczny M; Duda-Chodak A, 2023) · full text checked
Show datacompound-humulinones —is_extracted_into_beer_by→ process-dry-hopping
claim: clm-humulinones-dry-hop-extraction / type: processing / updated: 2026-08-30
dry hopping is used as A process that adds hop aroma after fermentationcontextual

Scope: The process definition used in a dry-hopping time study

Note: This is not treated as 『香りだけ』 (in translation: "aroma only"). Existing data show that humulinones, polyphenols, IBU, and iso-alpha acids can move as well.

Context: Dry hopping after fermentation is explained as a process that transfers volatile hop aroma.
Limitations: The same process also changes polyphenols and the iso-alpha acid ratio, so it is not an operation on aroma alone.
Source: Impact of Dry Hopping on Beer Flavor Stability (Titus BM; Lerno LA; Beaver JW; Byrnes NK; Heymann H; Oberholster A, 2021) · full text checked
Show dataprocess-dry-hopping —is_used_as→ "A process that adds hop aroma after fermentation"
claim: clm-dry-hopping-aroma-role / type: processing / updated: 2026-08-31
dry hopping differs from kettle hoppingcontextual

Scope: A general literature description of the process contrasting dry hopping with kettle hopping (not limited to specific hop varieties or dosages)

'Since dry hopping, there is no boiling, so the direct transfer of hop constituents is allowed and, consequentially, higher amounts are present in beer. Therefore, dry hopped beers have a more intense aroma, while bitterness is reduced compared to kettle hopped beers [2].' Confirmed this statement. Dry-hopped beer is described as having a stronger aroma, while bitterness is weaker compared with kettle-hopped beer.
Limitations: This is a summary of cited reference [2], not the authors' own measurement. No quantitative comparison values are given. The main text of that same paper deals with the relationship between HSI and sensory evaluation not of bitterness's 『強さ』 (in translation: "intensity") but of its 『質』 (in translation: "quality"), and does not itself verify this general statement.
Source: Impact of Hop Freshness on Dry Hopped Beer Quality (Rutnik K; Ocvirk M; Košir IJ, 2022) · full text checked
Show dataprocess-dry-hopping —differs_from→ process-boil-hopping
claim: clm-dryhop-bitterness-lower-than-kettle / type: processing / updated: 2026-09-15
polyphenols is extracted into beer by dry hoppingsupported

Scope: Pale ale dry hopped with Cascade hops at 8 oz/bbl (1.43 g/L) for 0-96 hours (freshly made Young beer and Aged beer after 30 days of storage at room temperature)

'Total polyphenol content generally increased in both young and aged treatments compared to controls.' In the Aged series, 『the majority of timepoints show a significant increase in polyphenol content by comparison to control beer after 2 h of dry hop contact』. In the Young series, the significant increase was only at the two time points of 3 hours and 96 hours: 『the greatest concentration of phenolics were in the 3- and 96-h hopping treatments of the Young beer (11.16 and 10.29 mg/L total phenols respectively)』. The authors also state 『polyphenol concentration markedly decreased lower than the control concentration after 24 h followed by an increase in concentration within the last 3 days of dry hop exposure』.
Limitations: Results from a single hop variety (Cascade) at a single dosage (1.43 g/L). The authors themselves describe the decrease-then-increase behavior as 『confounding』, and it is not a monotonic time-dependent relationship. This is a change in total polyphenol amount, and the contribution of individual compound classes is not shown.
Source: Impact of Dry Hopping on Beer Flavor Stability (Titus BM; Lerno LA; Beaver JW; Byrnes NK; Heymann H; Oberholster A, 2021) · full text checked
Show datacompound-polyphenols —is_extracted_into_beer_by→ process-dry-hopping
claim: clm-polyphenols-dry-hop-extraction-kinetics / type: processing / updated: 2026-09-15
dry hopping — typical dosage range: The standard dosage for dynamic dry hopping in the US is described as 500-800 g/hL; exceeding this noticeably lowers extraction efficiency per unit dosage due to saturation of the environment with hop oilscontextual

Scope: A review's description of dynamic (agitated) dry-hopping practice in US commercial brewing

Note: This describes US practice only; the authors add that high doses such as 2200 g/hL also exist, so it is not an absolute upper limit.

'The standard hop dosage used in this process for beers produced in the USA is in the range of 500–800 g/hL... The previously mentioned range (500–800 g/hL) is the optimal dry-hopping dose, according to Lafontaine and Shellhammer [1]. Above the aforementioned range, the efficiency of dry-hopping noticeably decreases due to the saturation of the environment with hop oils.' Confirmed this statement.
Limitations: A description limited to US practice. The authors also add that higher-dosage examples such as 2200 g/hL exist, so it is not an absolute upper limit. This entry has not checked the primary paper itself.
Source: Effects of Dry-Hopping on Beer Chemistry and Sensory Properties - A Review (Klimczak K; Cioch-Skoneczny M; Duda-Chodak A, 2023) · full text checked
Show dataprocess-dry-hopping —has_typical_dosage_range_of→ "The standard dosage for dynamic dry hopping in the US is described as 500-800 g/hL; exceeding this noticeably lowers extraction efficiency per unit dosage due to saturation of the environment with hop oils"
claim: clm-dryhop-dose-range-klimczak / type: processing / updated: 2026-09-15

↑ Top of page · ← Encyclopedia (English entries)