日本語版

bitterness units (BU / IBU)

concept / concept-bitterness-units

苦味単位(BU/IBU)

Bitterness units (BU / IBU): a spectrophotometric measure of an isooctane extract absorbing at 275 nm, conventionally used as a proxy for beer bitterness.

On this page (8 sections)
  1. Overview
  2. Sources for this overview (5)
  3. Topic hubs
  4. Follow the connections
  5. Related entries (10)
  6. Composition and content (9)
  7. Sensory (1)
  8. How processing and cooking change it (2)
↑

Reading the bitterness

Bitterness units (BU, or international bitterness units, IBU) have conventionally served as an indication of beer bitterness based on absorbance measured spectrophotometrically at a wavelength of 275 nanometers. They are often used as a proxy for the concentration of hop-derived iso-α-acids, but a study of dry-hopped beer showed that the number does not always track that concentration directly. In more than half of 15 commercial beers examined, IBU rose after dry hopping even though total iso-α-acid concentration fell.

New extraction of humulinones and, in some cases, polyphenols during dry hopping has been offered as a reason why IBU may rise while iso-α-acids fall. Because BU is a measure of absorbance at 275 nanometers, these compounds might raise the reading, but the cited literature did not directly demonstrate overlapping absorbance. A review from the University of Agriculture in Krakow says reports from multiple laboratories have well documented that dry hopping reduces iso-α-acids while increasing α-acids, humulinones, and polyphenols. It identifies humulinones as one major contributor to increased perceived bitterness and puts their relative bitterness at about 66% (±13%) of iso-α-acids.

BU itself need not match the intensity of bitterness when beer is tasted. In a dry-hopping trial using 3 Slovenian hop cultivars, BU first rose and then fell as an indicator of hop storage deterioration increased, whereas panel-rated bitterness quality was highest with fresh hops and then fell continually. The paper did not establish this divergence as a statistical correlation; it emerges from comparing separately reported measurement tables. The paper also says BU corresponded to humulinone amount rather than iso-α-acids. A recent analysis found hop phenolics in heavily dry-hopped beer at concentrations comparable to or higher than humulinones and iso-α-acids in the same beer; its authors suggest their contribution to bitterness and mouthfeel may be greater than previously thought. A single BU number cannot describe the character of beer bitterness.

Iso-α-acids themselves are not uniform either. A 2025 review of mouthfeel states that cis isomers are more bitter than trans isomers, suggesting beers with the same IBU might be perceived differently depending on their isomer ratios. This statement is the review's synthesis of earlier research.

Sources for this overview

  1. Toward Understanding the Bitterness of Dry-Hopped Beer

    Parkin E; Shellhammer TH / 2017 / journal article / abstract checked

    Checked for this overview: Confirmed that IBU rose while iso-α-acids fell in commercial beers before versus after dry hopping. / Checked the proposed mechanism of IBU increase through extraction of humulinones and polyphenols.

  2. Effects of Dry-Hopping on Beer Chemistry and Sensory Properties - A Review

    Klimczak K; Cioch-Skoneczny M; Duda-Chodak A / 2023 / review / full text checked

    Checked for this overview: Checked the review's statement, drawing on multiple laboratories, that humulinone bitterness is about 66% of iso-α-acid bitterness.

  3. Impact of Hop Freshness on Dry Hopped Beer Quality

    Rutnik K; Ocvirk M; Košir IJ / 2022 / journal article / full text checked

    Checked for this overview: Checked the divergent HSI, BU, and panel bitterness-rating data.

  4. Beyond International Bitterness Units: Chemical Profiling of Hop Phenolics in Dry-Hopped Beers Associated with Bitterness and Astringency

    Calvert D; Hopfer H; Kwasniewski M / 2026 / journal article / abstract checked

    Checked for this overview: Checked an analysis finding hop phenolics in dry-hopped beer at concentrations comparable to humulinones.

  5. Mouthfeel of Food and Beverages: A Comprehensive Review of Physiology, Biochemistry, and Key Sensory Compounds

    Wolinska-Kennard K; Schönberger C; Fenton A; Sahin AW / 2025 / review / full text checked

    Checked for this overview: Relationship between IBU and bitterness differences between cis and trans iso-α-acid isomers.

Follow the connections

dry hopping →increases→ bitterness units (BU / IBU)

Saison (beer style) →is documented as using→ bitterness units (BU / IBU)

Kölsch (beer style) →is documented as using→ bitterness units (BU / IBU)

Structured claims — open a section to read each claim's confidence, evidence and limits

Composition and content (9)

bitterness units (BU / IBU) is defined as International Bitterness Units (IBU) is positioned as a measure that quantifies the level of iso-α-acids into which hop-derived α-acids convert during brewing, and the source states that the level of iso-α-acids correlates closely with the bitterness of beer. Among iso-α-acids, the source states that the cis form is more bitter than the trans form.preliminary

Scope: Layer: literature. A statement given as background on beer bitterness in a 2025 review (a comprehensive review on mouthfeel).

Note: The bitterness difference between the cis/trans isomers and the correlation between IBU and iso-α-acids are statements the review makes citing Bossaert et al. 2022, Yan et al. 2024, and Luo et al. 2020 (none of the original papers has been read directly; this is a secondhand citation).

"The cis form of iso-alpha acids is more bitter than the trans form... it is worth mentioning the level of iso-alpha acids closely correlates with the bitterness of beer and is quantified using the International Bitterness Units (IBUs)."
Limitations: The original cited papers (Bossaert 2022, Yan 2024, Luo 2020) were not checked directly by this team. This relies on the review's summary description.
Source: Mouthfeel of Food and Beverages: A Comprehensive Review of Physiology, Biochemistry, and Key Sensory Compounds (Wolinska-Kennard K; Schönberger C; Fenton A; Sahin AW, 2025) · full text checked
Show dataconcept-bitterness-units —is_defined_as→ "International Bitterness Units (IBU) is positioned as a measure that quantifies the level of iso-α-acids into which hop-derived α-acids convert during brewing, and the source states that the level of iso-α-acids correlates closely with the bitterness of beer. Among iso-α-acids, the source states that the cis form is more bitter than the trans form."
claim: clm-w71d1-ibu-quantifies-iso-alpha-acids-cis-trans / type: composition / updated: 2026-09-07
Saison (beer style) is documented as using bitterness units (BU / IBU)supported

Scope: Limited to BJCP 2021 25B judging. Not measured results for all commercial products. The IBU guideline is 20–35.

The IBU guideline is 20–35.
Limitations: IBU serves as a guideline in this entry. It is not a measured perceived intensity or a strict pass/fail boundary.
Source: 2021 BJCP Beer Style Guidelines — 25B Saison (beer style) (Beer Judge Certification Program, 2021) · full text checked
Limits: The numbers and descriptions are judging guidelines to be used flexibly, not strict specifications.
Limitations: A source explaining the intended use of the guide itself.
Source: Introduction to the 2021 Guidelines (Gordon Strong; Kristen England; BJCP, 2021) · full text checked
Show dataconcept-saison-style —is_documented_using→ concept-bitterness-units
claim: cl-terms-saison-style-ibu / type: taxonomy / updated: 2026-09-10
Kölsch (beer style) is documented as using bitterness units (BU / IBU)supported

Scope: Limited to BJCP 2021 5B judging. Not measured results for all commercial products. The IBU guideline is 18–30.

The IBU guideline is 18–30.
Limitations: IBU serves as a guideline in this entry. It is not a measured perceived intensity or a strict pass/fail boundary.
Source: 2021 BJCP Beer Style Guidelines — 5B Kölsch (beer style) (Beer Judge Certification Program, 2021) · full text checked
Limits: The numbers and descriptions are judging guidelines to be used flexibly, not strict specifications.
Limitations: A source explaining the intended use of the guide itself.
Source: Introduction to the 2021 Guidelines (Gordon Strong; Kristen England; BJCP, 2021) · full text checked
Show dataconcept-kolsch-style —is_documented_using→ concept-bitterness-units
claim: cl-terms-kolsch-style-ibu / type: taxonomy / updated: 2026-09-10
Altbier (beer style) is documented as using bitterness units (BU / IBU)supported

Scope: Limited to BJCP 2021 7B judging. Not measured results for all commercial products. The IBU guideline is 25–50.

The IBU guideline is 25–50.
Limitations: IBU serves as a guideline in this entry. It is not a measured perceived intensity or a strict pass/fail boundary.
Source: 2021 BJCP Beer Style Guidelines — 7B Altbier (beer style) (Beer Judge Certification Program, 2021) · full text checked
Limits: The numbers and descriptions are judging guidelines to be used flexibly, not strict specifications.
Limitations: A source explaining the intended use of the guide itself.
Source: Introduction to the 2021 Guidelines (Gordon Strong; Kristen England; BJCP, 2021) · full text checked
Show dataconcept-altbier-style —is_documented_using→ concept-bitterness-units
claim: cl-terms-altbier-style-ibu / type: taxonomy / updated: 2026-09-10
Weissbier (beer style) is documented as using bitterness units (BU / IBU)supported

Scope: Limited to BJCP 2021 10A judging. Not measured results for all commercial products. The IBU guideline is 8–15.

The IBU guideline is 8–15.
Limitations: IBU serves as a guideline in this entry. It is not a measured perceived intensity or a strict pass/fail boundary.
Source: 2021 BJCP Beer Style Guidelines — 10A Weissbier (beer style) (Beer Judge Certification Program, 2021) · full text checked
Limits: The numbers and descriptions are judging guidelines to be used flexibly, not strict specifications.
Limitations: A source explaining the intended use of the guide itself.
Source: Introduction to the 2021 Guidelines (Gordon Strong; Kristen England; BJCP, 2021) · full text checked
Show dataconcept-weissbier-style —is_documented_using→ concept-bitterness-units
claim: cl-terms-weissbier-style-ibu / type: taxonomy / updated: 2026-09-10
Witbier (beer style) is documented as using bitterness units (BU / IBU)supported

Scope: Limited to BJCP 2021 24A judging. Not measured results for all commercial products. The IBU guideline is 8–20.

The IBU guideline is 8–20.
Limitations: IBU serves as a guideline in this entry. It is not a measured perceived intensity or a strict pass/fail boundary.
Source: 2021 BJCP Beer Style Guidelines — 24A Witbier (beer style) (Beer Judge Certification Program, 2021) · full text checked
Limits: The numbers and descriptions are judging guidelines to be used flexibly, not strict specifications.
Limitations: A source explaining the intended use of the guide itself.
Source: Introduction to the 2021 Guidelines (Gordon Strong; Kristen England; BJCP, 2021) · full text checked
Show dataconcept-witbier-style —is_documented_using→ concept-bitterness-units
claim: cl-terms-witbier-style-ibu / type: taxonomy / updated: 2026-09-10
Lambic (beer style) is documented as using bitterness units (BU / IBU)supported

Scope: Limited to BJCP 2021 23D judging. Not measured results for all commercial products. The IBU guideline is 0–10.

The IBU guideline is 0–10.
Limitations: IBU serves as a guideline in this entry. It is not a measured perceived intensity or a strict pass/fail boundary.
Source: 2021 BJCP Beer Style Guidelines — 23D Lambic (beer style) (Beer Judge Certification Program, 2021) · full text checked
Limits: The numbers and descriptions are judging guidelines to be used flexibly, not strict specifications.
Limitations: A source explaining the intended use of the guide itself.
Source: Introduction to the 2021 Guidelines (Gordon Strong; Kristen England; BJCP, 2021) · full text checked
Show dataconcept-lambic-style —is_documented_using→ concept-bitterness-units
claim: cl-terms-lambic-style-ibu / type: taxonomy / updated: 2026-09-10
Fruit beer (BJCP style category) is documented as using bitterness units (BU / IBU)supported

Scope: Limited to BJCP 2021 29A judging. Not measured results for all commercial products. IBU and other numbers vary with the base beer; no common range is set.

IBU and other numbers vary with the base beer; no common range is set.
Limitations: IBU serves as a guideline in this entry. It is not a measured perceived intensity or a strict pass/fail boundary.
Source: 2021 BJCP Beer Style Guidelines — 29A Fruit beer (BJCP style category) (Beer Judge Certification Program, 2021) · full text checked
Limits: The numbers and descriptions are judging guidelines to be used flexibly, not strict specifications.
Limitations: A source explaining the intended use of the guide itself.
Source: Introduction to the 2021 Guidelines (Gordon Strong; Kristen England; BJCP, 2021) · full text checked
Show dataconcept-fruit-beer-style —is_documented_using→ concept-bitterness-units
claim: cl-terms-fruit-beer-style-ibu / type: taxonomy / updated: 2026-09-10
Smoked beer (BJCP style category) is documented as using bitterness units (BU / IBU)supported

Scope: Limited to BJCP 2021 32A;32B judging. Not measured results for all commercial products. IBU and other numbers vary with the base beer; no common range is set.

IBU and other numbers vary with the base beer; no common range is set.
Limitations: IBU serves as a guideline in this entry. It is not a measured perceived intensity or a strict pass/fail boundary.
Source: 2021 BJCP Beer Style Guidelines — 32A;32B Smoked beer (BJCP style category) (Beer Judge Certification Program, 2021) · full text checked
Limits: The numbers and descriptions are judging guidelines to be used flexibly, not strict specifications.
Limitations: A source explaining the intended use of the guide itself.
Source: Introduction to the 2021 Guidelines (Gordon Strong; Kristen England; BJCP, 2021) · full text checked
Show dataconcept-smoked-beer-style —is_documented_using→ concept-bitterness-units
claim: cl-terms-smoked-beer-style-ibu / type: taxonomy / updated: 2026-09-10

Sensory (1)

bitterness units (BU / IBU) does not reliably track Perceived bitterness intensity or iso-α-acid concentration in dry-hopped beersupported

Scope: Dry-hopped and highly hopped beers. Pilot-scale experiments and commercial-product surveys across 3 independent studies

In the majority of the commercial beers surveyed, dry hopping raised IBU while total iso-α-acid concentration fell. In other words, the measured change in IBU did not track the compound class that IBU is conventionally said to measure.
Limitations: Abstract-level extraction; the abstract does not give the magnitude of the IBU increase or iso-α-acid decrease, or how many of the 15 brands showed a decrease.
Source: Toward Understanding the Bitterness of Dry-Hopped Beer (Parkin E; Shellhammer TH, 2017) · abstract checked
In discussing beer bitterness, the paper states, 'The BU method is most frequently used when the bitterness of beer is in question. However, BU values do not always correlate with the actual perceived bitterness,' and also, 'The BUs were correlated with the levels of humulinones.' In the data, measured BU rose then fell along with HSI (at HSI 0.3-0.7: Aurora 22, 29, 39, 35, 34 BU; Styrian Wolf 21, 25, 45, 42, 35 BU), while panel-rated bitterness quality peaked at HSI 0.3 (on a 1-5 scale: Celeia 4.9 +/- 0.21, Aurora 4.9 +/- 0.21, Styrian Wolf 5.0 +/- 0.16) and then declined. For Celeia, while iso-α-acids fell from 0.64 +/- 0.05 mg/L at HSI 0.3 to below the detection limit at HSI 0.6 and 0.7, BU stayed within a range of 21-28.
Limitations: Bitterness quality and BU are separate measures, and were not statistically correlated with each other in the text read. The discrepancy is an inference drawn from reading 2 tables side by side, not a correlation result stated by the paper itself. 10 assessors, 1 brewing trial per cell. The iso-α-acid concentrations in these beers are very low in absolute terms, consistent with dry-hop-only bittering, so they should not be directly compared with kettle-hopped beers.
Source: Impact of Hop Freshness on Dry Hopped Beer Quality (Rutnik K; Ocvirk M; Košir IJ, 2022) · full text checked
Intensely dry-hopped styles contained the highest hop phenol concentrations, up to 159 mg/L, matching or exceeding the humulinones and iso-α-acids in the same beer. The authors state that while humulinones are a known contributor to the soft bitterness of hazy styles, the role of hop phenols remains poorly understood, and conclude that hop phenols may be playing a larger role than previously thought in the bitterness and mouthfeel of modern dry-hopped beers.
Limitations: Abstract-level extraction of a compositional study. The abstract reports no sensory panel results, and the suggestion regarding bitterness and mouthfeel is the authors' proposal, not a measured perceptual result. The number of beers is not stated in the abstract.
Parallel measurement of the BU method and the HPLC method (direct quantification of iso-α-acids) in 34 commercial lager brands found a tendency for BU to read higher than HPLC in 60% of samples (BU 8-36 mg/L vs. HPLC total 8-41 mg/L). Furthermore, CATA sensory evaluation of 10 brands with differing chemical profiles found that 9 of 13 terms (harsh, progressive, sharp, instant, diminishing, rounded, acidic, metallic, vegetative, etc.) differed significantly among brands (p<0.05), with perceived "quality" differences that BU values alone cannot explain splitting systematically by type of hop product (conventional hopping / dry hopping / tetrahydro products). As a 4th dataset independent of the 3 existing claim lineages (Parkin/Rutnik/Calvert), this shows the BU-HPLC mismatch and BU-independent perceptual quality differences within a single dataset.
Limitations: The "overestimation" by BU was observed in only about 60% of samples; the rest were comparable or BU was in fact lower than HPLC (e.g., brand AA was BU 34 mg/L but HPLC 41 mg/L). The sensory side is qualitative CATA description (frequency data), not absolute intensity, and no correlation coefficient on an intensity scale is reported.
Source: The impact of hop bitter acid and polyphenol profiles on the perceived bitterness of beer (Oladokun O; Tarrega A; James S; Smart K; Hort J; Cook D, 2016) · full text checked
Show dataconcept-bitterness-units —does_not_reliably_track→ "Perceived bitterness intensity or iso-α-acid concentration in dry-hopped beer"
claim: clm-ibu-not-tracking-perceived-bitterness / type: sensory / updated: 2026-08-30

How processing and cooking change it (2)

dry hopping increases bitterness units (BU / IBU)supported

Scope: Pilot-scale dry hopping of a hop-free ale (0-16 g/L, 0-72 h), and a survey of 15 Pacific Northwest commercial beer brands sampled before and after dry hopping

Note: The 2 halves move in opposite directions: the conventional IBU proxy rises while the compound class it is supposed to stand in for falls. Central counter-evidence against treating IBU as a reading of iso-α-acids.

A trained sensory panel quantified the increase in bitterness when a hop-free ale was dry-hopped at 0-16 g/L over 0-72 h, alongside IBU and hop acid/polyphenol measurements. The increase in beer bitterness (IBU) from dry hopping was attributed to the extraction of humulinones and, in some cases, polyphenols. A parallel survey of 15 commercial beer brands sampled before and after dry hopping found a decrease in total iso-α-acid concentration in the majority of samples tested, showing that the dry-hopping process can remove iso-α-acids from beer.
Limitations: Abstract-level extraction. The number of panelists, magnitude of IBU, and iso-α-acid concentration are not given in the abstract, nor are sensory results corresponding to the commercial beer survey reported. The abstract as a whole still regards iso-α-acids as the main contributor to beer bitterness; this is a limitation on the IBU proxy, not a replacement of iso-α-acids.
Source: Toward Understanding the Bitterness of Dry-Hopped Beer (Parkin E; Shellhammer TH, 2017) · abstract checked
A review by an independent group (the Kraków University of Agriculture) synthesizes reports from multiple labs, stating, "A decrease in iso-α-acids, and a concomitant increase in α-acids, humulinones, and polyphenols, which are extracted from hops during the process, are well documented in the literature." It cites adsorption onto the hop material (citing demonstrations by Oladokun et al.) as the mechanism for the iso-α-acid decrease, names humulinones as "the main factors responsible for the increase in perceived bitterness in beers after the dry-hopping process," and gives their relative bitterness as 66% (±13%) of iso-α-acids. This shows that the two-directional movement reported by Parkin 2017 — IBU rising while iso-α-acids fall with dry hopping — is reproduced across the literature as a whole.
Limitations: A review, not new primary data. Many of the cited primary sources are from the Shellhammer/OSU lineage (the same lab as Parkin), so this does not substitute for a fully independent primary replication, but it does show convergence of reports across multiple countries and labs.
Source: Effects of Dry-Hopping on Beer Chemistry and Sensory Properties - A Review (Klimczak K; Cioch-Skoneczny M; Duda-Chodak A, 2023) · full text checked
Context: Brands inferred to be dry-hopped (inferred from humulinone detection: O, Q, AA, T, V) showed high polyphenol and humulinone concentrations, e.g., TPC>250 mg/L and up to 3 mg/L, and were described sensorially as "harsh" and "progressive" in bitterness. It states of humulinones, "a recent report by Hopsteiner suggested that humulinones are approximately 65% as bitter as iso-α-acids" (citing Steiner, 2015).
Limitations: Whether dry hopping was used is an inference not confirmed with the manufacturer. The primary source for the 65% relative bitterness of humulinones is an industry report (Hopsteiner, Steiner 2015), which is close to the "66% (±13%)" cited in the Klimczak 2023 review used elsewhere in this evidence, but both may trace back to the same primary industry report, so this cannot be called a fully independent replication (needs checking).
Source: The impact of hop bitter acid and polyphenol profiles on the perceived bitterness of beer (Oladokun O; Tarrega A; James S; Smart K; Hort J; Cook D, 2016) · full text checked
As an example of a primary study (Maye and Smith) summarized in the review, it is recorded that when Cascade hops were dry hopped at 1 lb./bbl. (equivalent to 386.54 g/hL) for 3 days at 16°C, iso-α-acid concentration fell from 51 mg/L to 32 mg/L, while alpha acid and humulinone concentrations both increased from below the detection limit to 13 mg/L.
Limitations: These are figures from a primary study (Maye and Smith) cited by the review; this entry has not checked the primary paper itself. This is a single example under one dosage, contact time, and temperature condition, and cannot be generalized.
Source: Effects of Dry-Hopping on Beer Chemistry and Sensory Properties - A Review (Klimczak K; Cioch-Skoneczny M; Duda-Chodak A, 2023) · full text checked
Show dataprocess-dry-hopping —increases→ concept-bitterness-units
claim: clm-dry-hopping-raises-ibu-lowers-iaa / type: processing / updated: 2026-08-30

↑ Top of page · ← Encyclopedia (English entries)