orange wine
process / process-skin-contact-maceration
スキンコンタクト(果皮浸漬) / skin-contact maceration (grape must)
Orange wine is a process in which skins and seeds of white and gray grape varieties remain in contact with the juice before and after fermentation. As more phenolic compounds are extracted, the perception of astringency and bitterness is described as potentially changing; white wines made with prolonged application of this process are called "orange wine" or "amber wine", among other names.
On this page (6 sections)
Reading the bitterness
Skin-contact maceration is a winemaking process in which the skins and seeds of white and gray grape varieties remain in contact with the juice before and after fermentation. As phenolic extraction proceeds, the perception of astringency and bitterness is described as potentially changing, and white wines made with prolonged skin contact are called 「オレンジワイン」 (in translation: "orange wine") or 「アンバーワイン」 (in translation: "amber wine"). A 2015 study compared wines made from Riesling and Gewürztraminer (2009 and 2010 vintages) with different skin-contact durations using 3 methods: descriptive analysis (DA), time-intensity (TI), and temporal dominance of sensations (TDS). Wines fermented fully on the skins were significantly more bitter than any other wine by DA and TI. Yet in TDS, the dominant sensation in the same wines was the mouthfeel of astringency, not bitterness. Varietal differences also appeared: Riesling differed significantly only in bitterness and color, whereas Gewürztraminer differed in bitterness, sweetness, sourness, astringency, several aroma attributes, and color. This example shows that conclusions about 「何が優勢な感覚か」 (in translation: "which sensation is dominant") can diverge by measurement method.
A conference poster published in 2026 used the Armenian variety Mskhali and Rkatsiteli, originally from Georgia and also widely cultivated in Armenia, to evaluate naturally fermented, low-intervention skin-contact wines (orange wines) descriptively with 2 panels, one in Armenia and one in Italy. Shared descriptors included dried fruit, cooked apple, apricot, walnut, honey, green (vegetal) notes, and orange blossom, as well as 「中程度の苦味」 (in translation: "moderate bitterness") and 「紅茶様の渋味」 (in translation: "black-tea-like astringency"). Chemical analysis found ranges of 10.7–11.9% alcohol, 4.20–5.83 g/L titratable acidity, and pH 3.52–4.07, and reported higher phenolic content in Rkatsiteli. The blend of both varieties, "Yerevak Orange Natural", was described as having a more structured, black-tea-like tannic character than Mskhali alone. The source does not state whether the poster was peer reviewed; given its poster format and small scale, these findings are treated as provisional.
In another study using South African Chenin Blanc, wines were made from the same source grapes under 3 conditions: a control without skin contact, skin contact only before fermentation (ScBF), and full fermentation on the skins (FoS), then assessed by a descriptive-analysis panel. Mean bitterness intensity was 30.36 for the control, 31.16 for ScBF (not significantly different from the control), and 46.70 for FoS (significantly higher than the control, p<0.001). The panel also rated astringency and sourness higher in FoS than in the control for the same wines. Thus brief skin contact only before fermentation showed no significant change in bitterness, whereas prolonged contact throughout fermentation significantly increased it.
Sources for this overview
Checked for this overview: Summarized the measurements from the comparison using 3 methods, DA/TI/TDS.
Checked for this overview: Used the shared descriptors and bitterness assessments of the 2 panels. / Used the chemical-analysis values and the quantitative varietal comparison.
Checked for this overview: The values for 3 conditions showing that the change in bitterness depends on the duration of contact.
Follow the connections
wine →— perceived bitterness is a…→ orange wine
orange wine →increases→ bitterness →can be measured separately …→ astringency
Structured claims — open a section to read each claim's confidence, evidence and limits
Sensory (3)
Scope: Riesling and Gewürztraminer (2009 and 2010 vintages), made with varying skin-contact times. Compared using 3 methods: descriptive analysis (DA), time-intensity (TI), and temporal dominance of sensations (TDS).
Note: In the descriptive analysis, Riesling differed only in bitterness and color, whereas Gewürztraminer showed significant differences across bitterness, sweetness, acidity, and astringency plus several aroma attributes and color. The wine fully fermented on the skins was significantly more bitter than any other wine by time-intensity and descriptive analysis, but under temporal dominance of sensations (TDS) the dominant sensation for that wine was not bitterness but the astringent mouthfeel. Recorded as an example showing that the conclusion about which sensation dominates can differ depending on the measurement method (DA/TI versus TDS).
Show data
ingredient-wine —has_perceived_bitterness_affected_by→ process-skin-contact-macerationScope: Low-intervention, naturally fermented skin-contact orange wines from Armenian Mskhali and Rkatsiteli, native to Georgia and also widely grown there; descriptive evaluation by 2 panels in Armenia and Italy. WAC-IVAS 2026 conference poster (dated 2026-06-25; DOI unverified).
Note: Among the descriptors shared by the 2 panels were dried fruit, cooked apple, apricot, walnut, honey, vegetal notes, and orange blossom, as well as 『中程度の苦味』 (in translation: "moderate bitterness") and 『紅茶様の渋味』 (in translation: "black-tea-like astringency"). The material does not state whether it was peer reviewed. Its poster format and small scale support treating it as preliminary.
Show data
ingredient-wine —has_perceived_bitterness_associated_with→ process-skin-contact-macerationScope: Layer: Food. South African Chenin Blanc wines made from the same source grapes under 3 conditions: control (no skin contact), skin contact before fermentation (ScBF), and full fermentation on the skins (FoS); evaluated by a descriptive-analysis panel.
Note: A source separate from the 2 existing claims (Sokolowsky 2015 and Mikayelyan 2026). It adds the condition dependence of the effect on bitterness according to whether skin contact occurs only briefly before fermentation or throughout fermentation (no significant difference for the former; a significant increase for the latter).
Show data
process-skin-contact-maceration —increases→ sensation-bitter