日本語版

orange wine

process / process-skin-contact-maceration

スキンコンタクト(果皮浸漬) / skin-contact maceration (grape must)

Orange wine is a process in which skins and seeds of white and gray grape varieties remain in contact with the juice before and after fermentation. As more phenolic compounds are extracted, the perception of astringency and bitterness is described as potentially changing; white wines made with prolonged application of this process are called "orange wine" or "amber wine", among other names.

On this page (6 sections)
  1. Overview
  2. Sources for this overview (3)
  3. Topic hubs
  4. Follow the connections
  5. Related entries (10)
  6. Sensory (3)
↑

Reading the bitterness

Skin-contact maceration is a winemaking process in which the skins and seeds of white and gray grape varieties remain in contact with the juice before and after fermentation. As phenolic extraction proceeds, the perception of astringency and bitterness is described as potentially changing, and white wines made with prolonged skin contact are called 「オレンジワイン」 (in translation: "orange wine") or 「アンバーワイン」 (in translation: "amber wine"). A 2015 study compared wines made from Riesling and Gewürztraminer (2009 and 2010 vintages) with different skin-contact durations using 3 methods: descriptive analysis (DA), time-intensity (TI), and temporal dominance of sensations (TDS). Wines fermented fully on the skins were significantly more bitter than any other wine by DA and TI. Yet in TDS, the dominant sensation in the same wines was the mouthfeel of astringency, not bitterness. Varietal differences also appeared: Riesling differed significantly only in bitterness and color, whereas Gewürztraminer differed in bitterness, sweetness, sourness, astringency, several aroma attributes, and color. This example shows that conclusions about 「何が優勢な感覚か」 (in translation: "which sensation is dominant") can diverge by measurement method.

A conference poster published in 2026 used the Armenian variety Mskhali and Rkatsiteli, originally from Georgia and also widely cultivated in Armenia, to evaluate naturally fermented, low-intervention skin-contact wines (orange wines) descriptively with 2 panels, one in Armenia and one in Italy. Shared descriptors included dried fruit, cooked apple, apricot, walnut, honey, green (vegetal) notes, and orange blossom, as well as 「中程度の苦味」 (in translation: "moderate bitterness") and 「紅茶様の渋味」 (in translation: "black-tea-like astringency"). Chemical analysis found ranges of 10.7–11.9% alcohol, 4.20–5.83 g/L titratable acidity, and pH 3.52–4.07, and reported higher phenolic content in Rkatsiteli. The blend of both varieties, "Yerevak Orange Natural", was described as having a more structured, black-tea-like tannic character than Mskhali alone. The source does not state whether the poster was peer reviewed; given its poster format and small scale, these findings are treated as provisional.

In another study using South African Chenin Blanc, wines were made from the same source grapes under 3 conditions: a control without skin contact, skin contact only before fermentation (ScBF), and full fermentation on the skins (FoS), then assessed by a descriptive-analysis panel. Mean bitterness intensity was 30.36 for the control, 31.16 for ScBF (not significantly different from the control), and 46.70 for FoS (significantly higher than the control, p<0.001). The panel also rated astringency and sourness higher in FoS than in the control for the same wines. Thus brief skin contact only before fermentation showed no significant change in bitterness, whereas prolonged contact throughout fermentation significantly increased it.

Sources for this overview

  1. Sensory impact of skin contact on white wines characterized by descriptive analysis, time-intensity analysis and temporal dominance of sensations analysis

    Sokolowsky M; Rosenberger A; Fischer U / 2015 / journal article / abstract checked

    Checked for this overview: Summarized the measurements from the comparison using 3 methods, DA/TI/TDS.

  2. Comparative analytical and sensory profiling of Armenian orange wines from widely cultivated grape varieties under low-intervention skin-contact vinification

    Mikayelyan M; Kazumyan K; Baghdasaryan J; Petrozziello M; Piano F; Asproudi A; Tsolakis C; Bonello F / 2026 / other / full text checked

    Checked for this overview: Used the shared descriptors and bitterness assessments of the 2 panels. / Used the chemical-analysis values and the quantitative varietal comparison.

  3. Effect of Skin Contact Before and During Alcoholic Fermentation on the Chemical and Sensory Profile of South African Chenin Blanc White Wines

    Aleixandre-Tudo JL; Weightman C; Panzeri V; Nieuwoudt HH; du Toit WJ / 2015 / journal article / full text checked

    Checked for this overview: The values for 3 conditions showing that the change in bitterness depends on the duration of contact.

Follow the connections

wine →— perceived bitterness is a…→ orange wine

orange wine →increases→ bitterness →can be measured separately …→ astringency

Structured claims — open a section to read each claim's confidence, evidence and limits

Sensory (3)

wine — perceived bitterness is affected by: orange winesupported

Scope: Riesling and Gewürztraminer (2009 and 2010 vintages), made with varying skin-contact times. Compared using 3 methods: descriptive analysis (DA), time-intensity (TI), and temporal dominance of sensations (TDS).

Note: In the descriptive analysis, Riesling differed only in bitterness and color, whereas Gewürztraminer showed significant differences across bitterness, sweetness, acidity, and astringency plus several aroma attributes and color. The wine fully fermented on the skins was significantly more bitter than any other wine by time-intensity and descriptive analysis, but under temporal dominance of sensations (TDS) the dominant sensation for that wine was not bitterness but the astringent mouthfeel. Recorded as an example showing that the conclusion about which sensation dominates can differ depending on the measurement method (DA/TI versus TDS).

The wine fully fermented on the skins was the most bitter by time-intensity and descriptive analysis, but under temporal dominance of sensations (TDS) the dominant sensation was astringency, not bitterness. The range of response to skin contact also differed between the two varieties.
Limitations: Limited to 2 varieties and specific winemaking conditions. The claim itself includes the point that the conclusion about what dominates can change depending on the method.
Show dataingredient-wine —has_perceived_bitterness_affected_by→ process-skin-contact-maceration
claim: clm-sokolowsky-2015-skin-contact-bitter-astringent-riesling-gewurztraminer / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-01
wine — perceived bitterness is associated with: orange winepreliminary

Scope: Low-intervention, naturally fermented skin-contact orange wines from Armenian Mskhali and Rkatsiteli, native to Georgia and also widely grown there; descriptive evaluation by 2 panels in Armenia and Italy. WAC-IVAS 2026 conference poster (dated 2026-06-25; DOI unverified).

Note: Among the descriptors shared by the 2 panels were dried fruit, cooked apple, apricot, walnut, honey, vegetal notes, and orange blossom, as well as 『中程度の苦味』 (in translation: "moderate bitterness") and 『紅茶様の渋味』 (in translation: "black-tea-like astringency"). The material does not state whether it was peer reviewed. Its poster format and small scale support treating it as preliminary.

The full text confirms that the 2 panels in Armenia and Italy shared 『中程度の苦味』 (in translation: "moderate bitterness") and 『紅茶様の渋味』 (in translation: "black-tea-like astringency"). It also gives winemaking conditions (natural fermentation, wild yeast, cap management 2–3 times per day, about 1 year of aging, no additives or sulfites), chemical values (alcohol 10.7–11.9%, titratable acidity 4.20–5.83 g/L, pH 3.52–4.07), Rkatsiteli’s higher phenolic content, and a varietal comparison in which the Yerevak Orange Natural blend has a more structured, black-tea-like tannic sensation than Mskhali alone.
Limitations: Peer-review status unknown; small-scale poster format; DOI unverified.
Source: Comparative analytical and sensory profiling of Armenian orange wines from widely cultivated grape varieties under low-intervention skin-contact vinification (Mikayelyan M; Kazumyan K; Baghdasaryan J; Petrozziello M; Piano F; Asproudi A; Tsolakis C; Bonello F, 2026) · full text checked
Two panels in Armenia and Italy evaluated naturally fermented, low-intervention skin-contact wines made from Mskhali alone, Rkatsiteli alone, and their blend (Yerevak Orange Natural), with cap management 2–3 times per day, no sulfites, and about 1 year of aging. Chemical composition varied between varieties (alcohol 10.7–11.9%, titratable acidity 4.20–5.83 g/L, pH 3.52–4.07); Rkatsiteli was reported to have higher phenolic content. The blend was described as having 『より構造化された、紅茶様のタンニン感』 (in translation: "a more structured, black-tea-like tannic sensation") than Mskhali alone. This suggests a possible correspondence between varietal differences in phenolic content and the quality of astringency, although no statistical correlation is presented.
Limitations: Peer-review status and DOI are unknown; this is a poster. The proposed relationship between phenolic content and perceived astringency or bitterness remains a descriptive suggestion without a quantitative correlation or statistical test. The varieties Mskhali and Rkatsiteli are not represented as separate entries, so no variety-specific claim is made here.
Source: Comparative analytical and sensory profiling of Armenian orange wines from widely cultivated grape varieties under low-intervention skin-contact vinification (Mikayelyan M; Kazumyan K; Baghdasaryan J; Petrozziello M; Piano F; Asproudi A; Tsolakis C; Bonello F, 2026) · full text checked
Show dataingredient-wine —has_perceived_bitterness_associated_with→ process-skin-contact-maceration
claim: clm-mikayelyan-2026-armenian-orange-wine-bitter-astringent-descriptors / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-01
orange wine increases bitternesssupported

Scope: Layer: Food. South African Chenin Blanc wines made from the same source grapes under 3 conditions: control (no skin contact), skin contact before fermentation (ScBF), and full fermentation on the skins (FoS); evaluated by a descriptive-analysis panel.

Note: A source separate from the 2 existing claims (Sokolowsky 2015 and Mikayelyan 2026). It adds the condition dependence of the effect on bitterness according to whether skin contact occurs only briefly before fermentation or throughout fermentation (no significant difference for the former; a significant increase for the latter).

Table 5 states: "Bitter 30.36a 31.16a 46.70b 0.000 **" (in Control/ScBF/FoS order; different superscript letters indicate a significant difference at p<0.05 in Fisher’s LSD test). The main text states, "The FoS wines were also described by the tasters as more astringent, bitter and sour (Table 5)."
Limitations: The panelist count and details of training could not be confirmed from the main text.
Source: Effect of Skin Contact Before and During Alcoholic Fermentation on the Chemical and Sensory Profile of South African Chenin Blanc White Wines (Aleixandre-Tudo JL; Weightman C; Panzeri V; Nieuwoudt HH; du Toit WJ, 2015) · full text checked
Show dataprocess-skin-contact-maceration —increases→ sensation-bitter
claim: clm-w71c2-cheninblanc-skincontact-bitter-da / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-07

↑ Top of page · ← Encyclopedia (English entries)