日本語版

arabica coffee

ingredient / ingredient-arabica-coffee

アラビカ種コーヒー / Coffea arabica

Coffee beans of Coffea arabica (Arabica). They are described as having lower caffeine and chlorogenic-acid contents than Robusta.

On this page (6 sections)
  1. Overview
  2. Sources for this overview (2)
  3. Topic hubs
  4. Follow the connections
  5. Related entries (10)
  6. Sensory (2)
↑

Reading the bitterness

Arabica (Coffea arabica) is one type of coffee bean alongside Robusta (Coffea canephora). In a comparison in which both types were roasted in the same industrial roaster under the same conditions and made into espresso, Arabica's sensory bitterness intensity was rated lower than Robusta's. The result compared only 1 lot of each type.

However, another study comparing decaffeinated blends reversed the ranking, rating Arabica as more bitter than Robusta. This was a sensory evaluation by 20 panelists on a 10-point scale; roasting conditions were optimized separately for each sample and were not controlled to the same degree of roasting between types. Whether roasting is standardized can reverse the bitterness ranking of Arabica and Robusta.

Sources for this overview

  1. Metabolomics Combined with Sensory Analysis Reveals the Impact of Different Extraction Methods on Coffee Beverages from Coffea arabica and Coffea canephora var. Robusta

    Vezzulli F; Rocchetti G; Lambri M; Lucini L / 2022 / journal article / full text checked

    Checked for this overview: Uses the sensory comparison of Robusta and Arabica bitterness under the same roasting conditions.

  2. Antioxidant and Sensory Assessment of Innovative Coffee Blends of Reduced Caffeine Content

    Šeremet D; Fabečić P; Vojvodić Cebin A; Mandura Jarić A; Pudić R; Komes D / 2022 / journal article / full text checked

    Checked for this overview: Uses the opposite-direction evaluation result for bitterness and astringency in decaffeinated blends.

Follow the connections

robusta coffee →differs from→ arabica coffee

Structured claims — open a section to read each claim's confidence, evidence and limits

Sensory (2)

robusta coffee differs from arabica coffeesupported

Scope: Layer: food. Both species were roasted with the same roasting process on an Italian industrial roaster (Musetti), and compared across 4 extraction methods — espresso, Neapolitan, moka, and filter — using untargeted metabolomics plus sensory analysis.

"Robusta showed higher bitterness and aroma persistence, together with aromas of caramel, roasted and stone fruits." For roasting, the source states: "Two roasted coffee samples were supplied...with the same roasting process."
Limitations: A comparison of only 1 lot per species. Details such as the number of sensory panelists were not confirmed in the body text.
Show dataingredient-robusta-coffee —differs_from→ ingredient-arabica-coffee
claim: clm-w70a-robusta-arabica-bitterness-same-roast / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-07
arabica coffee differs from robusta coffeesupported

Scope: Layer: food. A 10-point-scale sensory evaluation by 20 panelists (experienced in coffee sensory evaluation). Roast conditions were optimized individually for each sample and were not standardized to the same roast degree across species.

"Arabica decaffeinated brews were evaluated as more bitter." "Robusta brews were found to be more astringent than Arabica regardless of the brewing method... Arabica had a milder taste due to lower content of these acids [chlorogenic acids]."
Limitations: Roast conditions were optimized individually for each sample and were not standardized to the same roast degree across species.
Source: Antioxidant and Sensory Assessment of Innovative Coffee Blends of Reduced Caffeine Content (Šeremet D; Fabečić P; Vojvodić Cebin A; Mandura Jarić A; Pudić R; Komes D, 2022) · full text checked
Show dataingredient-arabica-coffee —differs_from→ ingredient-robusta-coffee
claim: clm-w70a-arabica-decaf-more-bitter-than-robusta / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-07

↑ Top of page · ← Encyclopedia (English entries)