日本語版

robusta coffee

ingredient / ingredient-robusta-coffee

ロブスタ種コーヒー / Coffea canephora

Coffee beans of Coffea canephora (Robusta). They are described as having higher caffeine and chlorogenic-acid contents than Arabica.

On this page (7 sections)
  1. Overview
  2. Sources for this overview (2)
  3. Topic hubs
  4. Follow the connections
  5. Related entries (10)
  6. Composition and content (1)
  7. Sensory (2)
↑

Reading the bitterness

Robusta (Coffea canephora) is a type of coffee bean. In a comparison in which it and Arabica were roasted in the same industrial roaster under the same conditions and made into espresso, Robusta had greater sensory bitterness intensity and greater aroma persistence, with caramel-, roast-, and stone-fruit-like aromas. However, the result compares only 1 lot of each type.

Conversely, in a comparison of decaffeinated blends for which roasting conditions were individually optimized for each sample (20 panelists, 10-point scale), Robusta was rated lower in bitterness than Arabica. However, in that study as well, Robusta was more astringent than Arabica regardless of extraction method, and the paper attributes this to Robusta's higher chlorogenic-acid content.

In HPLC analysis of 6 roasted coffee-bean samples of mixed origins and types, Brazilian Robusta had the highest caffeine content, 22.38 mg/g (dry-matter basis), among the 6 samples. The same beans also showed the highest values for chlorogenic-acid isomers (3-caffeoylquinic acid 14.09, 4-caffeoylquinic acid 8.23, and 5-caffeoylquinic acid 4.65 mg/g, all on a dry-matter basis). This is the only 1 of the 6 samples explicitly identified as Robusta; the origins and types of the other samples have not been confirmed.

Sources for this overview

  1. Metabolomics Combined with Sensory Analysis Reveals the Impact of Different Extraction Methods on Coffee Beverages from Coffea arabica and Coffea canephora var. Robusta

    Vezzulli F; Rocchetti G; Lambri M; Lucini L / 2022 / journal article / full text checked

    Checked for this overview: Uses the result of higher sensory bitterness intensity for Robusta under identical roasting conditions.

  2. Antioxidant and Sensory Assessment of Innovative Coffee Blends of Reduced Caffeine Content

    Šeremet D; Fabečić P; Vojvodić Cebin A; Mandura Jarić A; Pudić R; Komes D / 2022 / journal article / full text checked

    Checked for this overview: Uses the relationship between astringency and chlorogenic acid in Robusta in decaffeinated blends. / Uses measured caffeine and chlorogenic-acid contents for Brazilian Robusta.

Follow the connections

robusta coffee →differs from→ arabica coffee

robusta coffee →— composition→ caffeine →is a poor universal prototy…→ bitterness

Structured claims — open a section to read each claim's confidence, evidence and limits

Composition and content (1)

robusta coffee — composition: caffeinesupported

Scope: Layer: food (roasted beans, dry-matter-basis values). HPLC analysis. The other 5 samples were a mix of arabica and robusta with some origins undisclosed; this is not an exhaustive species-by-species comparison.

Among 6 roasted coffee samples, Brazilian robusta (RC_6) had the highest caffeine content at 22.38 mg/g (dry-matter basis). The same bean also had the highest values for 3-CQA (14.09), 4-CQA (8.23), and 5-CQA (4.65 mg/g, dry-matter basis). "Robusta beans were characterized by higher content of all determined bioactive parameters."
Limitations: Of the 6 samples, only RC_6 is explicitly labeled as robusta. The origin and species breakdown of the others was not confirmed in this summary.
Source: Antioxidant and Sensory Assessment of Innovative Coffee Blends of Reduced Caffeine Content (Šeremet D; Fabečić P; Vojvodić Cebin A; Mandura Jarić A; Pudić R; Komes D, 2022) · full text checked
Show dataingredient-robusta-coffee —has_composition→ compound-caffeine
claim: clm-w70a-robusta-brazil-highest-caffeine-cga / type: composition / updated: 2026-09-07

Sensory (2)

robusta coffee differs from arabica coffeesupported

Scope: Layer: food. Both species were roasted with the same roasting process on an Italian industrial roaster (Musetti), and compared across 4 extraction methods — espresso, Neapolitan, moka, and filter — using untargeted metabolomics plus sensory analysis.

"Robusta showed higher bitterness and aroma persistence, together with aromas of caramel, roasted and stone fruits." For roasting, the source states: "Two roasted coffee samples were supplied...with the same roasting process."
Limitations: A comparison of only 1 lot per species. Details such as the number of sensory panelists were not confirmed in the body text.
Show dataingredient-robusta-coffee —differs_from→ ingredient-arabica-coffee
claim: clm-w70a-robusta-arabica-bitterness-same-roast / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-07
arabica coffee differs from robusta coffeesupported

Scope: Layer: food. A 10-point-scale sensory evaluation by 20 panelists (experienced in coffee sensory evaluation). Roast conditions were optimized individually for each sample and were not standardized to the same roast degree across species.

"Arabica decaffeinated brews were evaluated as more bitter." "Robusta brews were found to be more astringent than Arabica regardless of the brewing method... Arabica had a milder taste due to lower content of these acids [chlorogenic acids]."
Limitations: Roast conditions were optimized individually for each sample and were not standardized to the same roast degree across species.
Source: Antioxidant and Sensory Assessment of Innovative Coffee Blends of Reduced Caffeine Content (Šeremet D; Fabečić P; Vojvodić Cebin A; Mandura Jarić A; Pudić R; Komes D, 2022) · full text checked
Show dataingredient-arabica-coffee —differs_from→ ingredient-robusta-coffee
claim: clm-w70a-arabica-decaf-more-bitter-than-robusta / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-07

↑ Top of page · ← Encyclopedia (English entries)