日本語版

palatability (medicinal product)

concept / concept-palatability

服用受容性(パラタビリティ)

Overall acceptability of an oral medicine in relation to smell, taste, aftertaste, and texture (EMA/CHMP/QWP/805880/2012 Rev. 2). WHO TRS 970 Annex 5 adds the dose volume or size to the same construct.

On this page (6 sections)
  1. Overview
  2. Sources for this overview (5)
  3. Topic hubs
  4. Related entries (6)
  5. Sensory (3)
  6. Safety and regulation (2)
↑

Reading the bitterness

Palatability describes overall acceptability of an oral medicine in terms of smell, taste, aftertaste, and mouthfeel, as defined by the EMA guideline EMA/CHMP/QWP/805880/2012 Rev. 2. WHO Technical Report Series 970, Annex 5, uses the same idea and also includes dose volume or dosage-form size in assessment. Bitterness is one taste factor affecting acceptability, and research measuring or moderating pharmaceutical bitterness is often ultimately assessed within this palatability framework.

The EU guideline for developing pediatric medicines says information on an active ingredient's palatability should be obtained early, from a dedicated adult panel or existing literature, for example. Unless there is a particular reason otherwise, the pediatric formulation itself should have satisfactory taste and mouthfeel without mixing it with food or drink. The same guideline warns against making pediatric formulations too attractive, like candy, because this is known to raise the incidence of accidental poisoning.

WHO and EMA both state that palatability strongly affects patient acceptability and, through it, adherence to medication. The WHO annex says palatability can be decisive for adherence and that the active ingredient's taste can influence dosage-form choice and design, including taste-masking components. In interviews with 172 children aged 3–10 and 130 mothers in Philadelphia, 89 responding children (58.2%) described having refused medication; among 86 who gave a reason, 73 (84.9%) cited taste or flavor, whereas only 7 (8.1%) cited swallowing or choking.

The interview study's authors themselves say it is unknown how many actual medication failures are due solely to unpleasant taste and that prospective research is needed to understand individual differences. Regulatory documents repeatedly frame palatability as an important link between bitterness and adherence, but the strength of that link has not been supported by measurement in the materials checked here.

Methodological guidance on sensory evaluation of pharmaceutical formulations identifies confusion between actual bitterness and similar sensations such as sourness and astringency as the most common misuse of terms. It says vocabulary understood by panelists matters for characterizing product flavor accurately. The same guidance says taste is one of the major factors in formulation acceptability when the active ingredient contacts oral taste buds, and cites earlier research indicating that children are more sensitive than adults to bitterness, which is naturally aversive unlike sweetness.

A study of the same orally disintegrating tablet measured overall acceptability (palatability) as well as bitterness. During disintegration, overall palatability VAS scores were 38–46 for formulations comparable to no citric acid, but fell to 26 and 20 with 5% and 10% citric acid, respectively. Despite suppressing bitterness, higher citric-acid concentrations thus worsened overall palatability. After spitting out the tablet, however, formulations with 0.1% and 2.5% citric acid scored 54 and 55 for overall palatability, above the no-additive score of 44.

Sources for this overview

  1. Guideline on pharmaceutical development of medicines for paediatric use (EMA/CHMP/QWP/805880/2012 Rev. 2)

    European Medicines Agency; Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP); Paediatric Committee (PDCO) / 2013 / government document / full text checked

    Checked for this overview: Checked the definitions of palatability and the attributes assessed. / Checked the advice to obtain palatability information early and the warning against candy-like appeal. / Checked the EMA position on effects on acceptability and adherence.

  2. Development of paediatric medicines: points to consider in formulation (WHO Technical Report Series No. 970, Annex 5)

    WHO Expert Committee on Specifications for Pharmaceutical Preparations / 2012 / government document / full text checked

    Checked for this overview: Checked the WHO position that palatability can be decisive for adherence.

  3. Children's perceptions about medicines: individual differences and taste

    Mennella JA; Roberts KM; Mathew PS; Reed DR / 2015 / journal article / full text checked

    Checked for this overview: Checked actual counts for experience of refusing medication and reasons given. / Checked the authors' own limitation that the size of taste's contribution was unmeasured.

  4. A Guide to Best Practice in Sensory Analysis of Pharmaceutical Formulations

    Clapham D; Belissa E; Inghelbrecht S; Pensé-Lhéritier AM; Ruiz F; Sheehan L; Shine M; Vallet T; Walsh J; Tuleu C / 2023 / journal article / full text checked

    Checked for this overview: Statement that confusion of bitterness with sourness or astringency is most common. / Earlier research cited as showing greater bitterness sensitivity in children than adults.

  5. Citric Acid Suppresses the Bitter Taste of Olopatadine Hydrochloride Orally Disintegrating Tablets

    Sotoyama M; Uchida S; Tanaka S; Hakamata A; Odagiri K; Inui N; Watanabe H; Namiki N / 2017 / journal article / full text checked

    Checked for this overview: The reversed relationship between citric-acid concentration and overall palatability.

Structured claims — open a section to read each claim's confidence, evidence and limits

Sensory (3)

palatability (medicinal product) — perceived bitterness is associated with: In sensory evaluation of pharmaceutical formulations, confusion between actual bitterness and similar sensations such as sourness and astringency is described as the most common misuse of terms. Selecting vocabulary that panelists understand and that best characterizes product flavor is considered important.supported

Scope: Layer: literature (methodological guidance).

"The most common confusion of terms in the evaluation of medicinal products is between actual bitterness and other similar sensations such as sourness and astringency. It is therefore important to select a vocabulary that is understood by the panellists and that allows an optimal characterisation of the organoleptic aspects of the product."
Limitations: A recommendation based on the authors' practical experience and existing literature, not data from one experiment.
Source: A Guide to Best Practice in Sensory Analysis of Pharmaceutical Formulations (Clapham D; Belissa E; Inghelbrecht S; Pensé-Lhéritier AM; Ruiz F; Sheehan L; Shine M; Vallet T; Walsh J; Tuleu C, 2023) · full text checked
Show dataconcept-palatability —has_perceived_bitterness_associated_with→ "In sensory evaluation of pharmaceutical formulations, confusion between actual bitterness and similar sensations such as sourness and astringency is described as the most common misuse of terms. Selecting vocabulary that panelists understand and that best characterizes product flavor is considered important."
claim: clm-w71d2-palatability-bitterness-sourness-astringency-confusion / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-07
palatability (medicinal product) — perceived bitterness is associated with: For dosage forms in which the active ingredient can contact taste buds in the mouth, taste is one major determinant of acceptability, especially for children. Children are more sensitive than adults to bitterness, which is inherently aversive unlike sweetness.preliminary

Scope: Layer: literature (methodological guidance).

Note: A review statement citing earlier research (secondary citation).

"it is for the assessment/evaluation/measurement of taste/palatability, in particular bitter taste, that the use of human sensory studies are invaluable... it is well established that for formulations where the API can interact with the taste buds in the oral cavity..., taste is either the major factor, or at least one of the major determinants, of product acceptability... This is especially true in paediatrics because children are more sensitive than adults to bitterness which, unlike sweet flavours, is naturally aversive."
Limitations: The statement is from a review; the original papers [52-54] have not been read and the cited sources need separate checking.
Source: A Guide to Best Practice in Sensory Analysis of Pharmaceutical Formulations (Clapham D; Belissa E; Inghelbrecht S; Pensé-Lhéritier AM; Ruiz F; Sheehan L; Shine M; Vallet T; Walsh J; Tuleu C, 2023) · full text checked
Show dataconcept-palatability —has_perceived_bitterness_associated_with→ "For dosage forms in which the active ingredient can contact taste buds in the mouth, taste is one major determinant of acceptability, especially for children. Children are more sensitive than adults to bitterness, which is inherently aversive unlike sweetness."
claim: clm-w71d2-palatability-pediatric-bitterness-sensitivity / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-07
palatability (medicinal product) — perceived bitterness is associated with: In orally disintegrating tablets containing a bitter drug, 5% and 10% citric acid lowered overall palatability VAS scores during disintegration to 26 and 20, below the no-additive-comparable 38–46 range. Thus, despite suppressing bitterness, high citric-acid concentrations worsened overall palatability. After spitting out, overall scores for 0.1% and 2.5% citric acid were 54 and 55, above the no-additive score of 44.supported

Scope: Layer: food (orally disintegrating pharmaceutical tablet). Human VAS sensory trial.

"Overall palatability scores of C0-, C0.1-, C1-, and C2.5-ODTs in the 1st evaluation were similar (38-46), but those of C5-ODT and C10-ODT were lower (26 and 20, respectively)... In the 2nd evaluation, the overall palatability scores of C0.1-ODT and C2.5-ODT (54 and 55) were higher than that of C0-ODT (44)."
Limitations: A result from one active ingredient and one dosage form.
Source: Citric Acid Suppresses the Bitter Taste of Olopatadine Hydrochloride Orally Disintegrating Tablets (Sotoyama M; Uchida S; Tanaka S; Hakamata A; Odagiri K; Inui N; Watanabe H; Namiki N, 2017) · full text checked
Show dataconcept-palatability —has_perceived_bitterness_associated_with→ "In orally disintegrating tablets containing a bitter drug, 5% and 10% citric acid lowered overall palatability VAS scores during disintegration to 26 and 20, below the no-additive-comparable 38–46 range. Thus, despite suppressing bitterness, high citric-acid concentrations worsened overall palatability. After spitting out, overall scores for 0.1% and 2.5% citric acid were 54 and 55, above the no-additive score of 44."
claim: clm-w71d2-palatability-citric-acid-bitterness-suppression-tradeoff / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-07

Safety and regulation (2)

palatability (medicinal product) must be characterised and justified in EU paediatric dossiers: Information on the palatability of the active substance should be obtained early, for example from a dedicated adult panel or from the literature. Unless otherwise justified, the palatability of a pediatric formulation should be satisfactory on its own -- without being mixed into food or drink.contextual

Scope: European Union. The Palatability section of EMA/CHMP/QWP/805880/2012 Rev. 2 (a guideline effective 2014-02-15)

Note: A requirement in the application dossier, not a sensory measurement. The same guideline warns that a pediatric formulation must not resemble candy, because this is known to increase accidental poisoning.

This guideline defines palatability as the overall reception of a (mostly oral) medicinal product with respect to smell, taste, aftertaste, and texture, and requires that information on the active substance's palatability be obtained early (for example, from a dedicated adult panel or from the literature). It states that, unless otherwise justified, the palatability of a pediatric formulation should be satisfactory on its own, that is, met without being mixed into food or drink. It also states that a pediatric formulation must not become too attractive to children (must not resemble candy), and that this is known to raise the rate of accidental poisoning.
Limitations: A regulatory expectation, not an empirical finding. The guideline gives no acceptance criteria, no standard method for palatability testing, and no threshold.
Source: Guideline on pharmaceutical development of medicines for paediatric use (EMA/CHMP/QWP/805880/2012 Rev. 2) (European Medicines Agency; Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP); Paediatric Committee (PDCO), 2013) · full text checked
Show dataconcept-palatability —must_be_characterised_and_justified_in_eu_paediatric_dossiers→ "Information on the palatability of the active substance should be obtained early, for example from a dedicated adult panel or from the literature. Unless otherwise justified, the palatability of a pediatric formulation should be satisfactory on its own -- without being mixed into food or drink."
claim: clm-paediatric-palatability-must-be-justified / type: regulatory / updated: 2026-08-30
palatability (medicinal product) is stated in WHO and EMA documents to materially affect Patient acceptability, and, through it, adherence for oral pediatric medicinescontextual

Scope: Section 3.2 of WHO TRS 970 Annex 5 and Section 10 of EMA/CHMP/QWP/805880/2012 Rev. 2. In both cases, a position statement within a guidance document that reports no effect size

Note: This claim concerns what the 2 official documents themselves state. Neither document quantifies taste's contribution to non-adherence. See the limited evidence from Mennella 2015.

The guideline states that patient acceptability is likely to have a significant impact on patient adherence and, in turn, on the safety and efficacy of the medicine, and lists palatability and ease of swallowing at the top of the product characteristics that determine acceptability.
Limitations: This is expressed as a likelihood ('is likely to have'); the guideline presents no supporting data and no effect size.
Source: Guideline on pharmaceutical development of medicines for paediatric use (EMA/CHMP/QWP/805880/2012 Rev. 2) (European Medicines Agency; Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP); Paediatric Committee (PDCO), 2013) · full text checked
This annex defines palatability as the overall acceptance of the taste, flavor, smell, dose volume or size, and texture of a medicine that is taken orally or swallowed, and states that palatability can be decisive for adherence, and that the active substance's palatability can influence the choice of dosage form and its design (which may include taste-masking components).
Limitations: 'Can be decisive' is a qualitative position statement; this annex cites no adherence studies and reports no effect size.
Source: Development of paediatric medicines: points to consider in formulation (WHO Technical Report Series No. 970, Annex 5) (WHO Expert Committee on Specifications for Pharmaceutical Preparations, 2012) · full text checked
Context: The annex states that children's sensory systems for detecting taste, smell, and chemical irritants are sufficiently developed, that they appear to prefer sweeter tastes than adults, and that the goal of taste masking need not be a delicious medicine -- a taste acceptable in as many countries as possible, with cultural differences taken into account, is sufficient.
Limitations: A statement within a points-to-consider document. The statement about sweetness preference cites only one supporting reference, which has not been read here.
Source: Development of paediatric medicines: points to consider in formulation (WHO Technical Report Series No. 970, Annex 5) (WHO Expert Committee on Specifications for Pharmaceutical Preparations, 2012) · full text checked
Context: Among 153 responding children aged 3-10, 89 (58.2%) reported experience of refusing medication, and among the 86 who gave a reason, 84.9% (73/86) cited taste or flavor. Swallowing difficulty or throat catching accounted for 8.1% (7/86).
Limitations: These are self-reported reasons for past refusal. The sample is not representative of the population, and medication adherence itself was not measured.
Source: Children's perceptions about medicines: individual differences and taste (Mennella JA; Roberts KM; Mathew PS; Reed DR, 2015) · full text checked
Limits: The authors state that it is unknown how many instances of suboptimal medication use are attributable to a medicine's bad taste alone, and that prospective research is needed to understand the role of individual differences in the acceptance of individual medicines' taste.
Limitations: The quantitative link between palatability and adherence asserted by WHO and EMA has therefore not been established by measurement in the literature read here.
Source: Children's perceptions about medicines: individual differences and taste (Mennella JA; Roberts KM; Mathew PS; Reed DR, 2015) · full text checked
Show dataconcept-palatability —is_stated_by_who_and_ema_to_materially_affect→ "Patient acceptability, and, through it, adherence for oral pediatric medicines"
claim: clm-palatability-adherence-official-position / type: regulatory / updated: 2026-08-30

↑ Top of page · ← Encyclopedia (English entries)