日本語版

Research note 046 — 2026-09-04

How Thin a Bitterness Can People Notice — A Map of Thresholds

Research does not answer, with a single number, the 「これくらい」 (in translation: "how dilute") in「これくらい薄ければ苦味は分からない」 (in translation: "if it's this dilute, you can't tell it's bitter"). First, the numbers differ between the stage of noticing that something is there (detection) and the stage of recognizing it's bitter (recognition). Next, different compounds differ by orders of magnitude, and even within the same person, how widely individual variation opens up differs by compound. Further, the premises change depending on whether the measuring side is a small trained panel or general subjects, and the numbers move depending on whether the substance is dissolved in water or in beer or juice. This note lines up the reported numbers along each of these four axes.

On this page (8 sections)
  1. What this page establishes
  2. Detection threshold and recognition threshold are not the same number
  3. The spread between compounds, and the spread between individuals
  4. Trained panels and the general public
  5. The threshold of the same substance moves with the medium
  6. An honest note
  7. Frequently asked
  8. What is not known
↑

What this page establishes

Detection threshold and recognition threshold are not the same number

The detection threshold, where one notices 「わずかに何か違う」 (in translation: "something is faintly different"), and the recognition threshold, where one can name it 「これは苦味だ」 (in translation: "this is bitterness"), come out as different numbers even for the same substance. For picrocrocin, saffron's principal bitter component, the detection threshold in water was 5.34 mg/L and the recognition threshold was 7.26 mg/L. Under hot presentation at 61±4°C the threshold is reported to fall, and in 40% ethanol the bitterness is reported to be enhanced.

picrocrocin has human taste thresholds of Detection threshold 5.34 mg/L and recognition threshold 7.26 mg/L in water (trained panel, Ascending Forced Choice of Limits). Threshold decreased under hot presentation (61±4°C); bitterness was enhanced in 40% (v/v) ethanol; and co-occurring saffron volatile compounds increased bitterness perception.supported

Scope: Water and ethanol-based matrices, with and without co-occurring components

Note: As with other existing threshold-type claims (quinine, naringin, etc.), this preserves the point that there is no single 「閾値」 (in translation: "threshold") but rather a condition-dependent one.

Detection threshold 5.34 mg/L and recognition threshold 7.26 mg/L (in water). Decreased under hot presentation (61±4°C). Bitterness enhanced in 40% ethanol. Co-occurring volatile compounds increased bitterness perception in both the water and ethanol extracts.
Limitations: Panel n and individual variation are in the full text (not read).
Source: Sensory Threshold Studies of Picrocrocin, the Major Bitter Compound of Saffron (Chrysanthou A; Pouliou E; Kyriakoudi A; Tsimidou MZ, 2015) · abstract checked
Show datacompound-picrocrocin —has_human_taste_thresholds_of→ "Detection threshold 5.34 mg/L and recognition threshold 7.26 mg/L in water (trained panel, Ascending Forced Choice of Limits). Threshold decreased under hot presentation (61±4°C); bitterness was enhanced in 40% (v/v) ethanol; and co-occurring saffron volatile compounds increased bitterness perception."
claim: clm-picrocrocin-thresholds / type: sensory / updated: 2026-08-31

Iso-alpha acids, hops' principal bitter acid, were measured in 14 volunteers by the ASTM 1432 method (three-alternative forced choice) dissolved in unhopped lager beer, and the group-level detection threshold was 7.1 mg/L (range 4.5-11.2 mg/L). The group value is the point at which 50% of panelists correctly identified it, and individual thresholds are read off a curve at 66% correct.

iso-α-acids (isohumulones) has a human detection threshold of Group-level detection threshold of 7.1 mg/L in a hop-free lager beer matrixsupported

Scope: ASTM method 1432 three-alternative forced-choice test in a hop-free lager beer matrix, 14 volunteers

In a hop-free lager beer matrix, the group-wise detection threshold for iso-α-acids was 7.1 mg/L, with 4.5-11.2 mg/L given alongside in parentheses. The group value was taken as the point on a rank-probability plot where 50% of panelists correctly identified the spiked sample, and the individual threshold was read from a fitted sigmoid curve at 66% correct.
Limitations: Abstract-level extraction. In the abstract's wording ('the group-wise detection thresholds and standard deviations of thresholds... were 7.1 mg/L (4.5-11.2 mg/L)'), whether the parenthetical is a standard-deviation-derived interval or the observed range across panelists is ambiguous, and it is recorded here verbatim without interpretation. The detection threshold is not a value for supra-threshold intensity, and the hop-free matrix is not a finished hopped beer.
Show datacompound-iso-alpha-acids —has_human_detection_threshold_of→ "Group-level detection threshold of 7.1 mg/L in a hop-free lager beer matrix"
claim: clm-iso-alpha-acid-detection-threshold / type: sensory / updated: 2026-08-30

Measuring tetrahydroiso-alpha acids with the same method and the same 14 people, the detection threshold came out lower, at 2.7 mg/L (range 0.7-10.0 mg/L), than iso-alpha acids' 7.1 mg/L (4.5-11.2 mg/L). Comparing the results of the ASTM 1432 method and the ASTM 679 method, no difference is reported except for 1 test day.

tetrahydro-iso-α-acids has a lower human detection threshold than iso-α-acids (isohumulones)supported

Scope: ASTM method 1432 three-alternative forced-choice testing in an unhopped lager beer matrix, with 14 volunteers per compound

Note: In the abstract, the tetra distribution (0.7-10.0) is wider than that of iso (4.5-11.2), so the ordering of the point estimates should not be read as a clear separation between the 2 panelist distributions. The abstract does not report a statistical comparison of the 2 thresholds.

Measured in the same unhopped lager beer matrix under the same protocol, the group detection threshold for tetrahydroiso-alpha acids was 2.7 mg/L (0.7-10.0 mg/L in parentheses), versus 7.1 mg/L (4.5-11.2 mg/L) for iso-alpha acids. Group and individual results were compared between ASTM 1432 and ASTM 679, and there was no statistical difference for any but 1 test day.
Limitations: Abstract-level extraction. The abstract does not report a statistical test comparing the iso and tetra thresholds against each other, so the ordering relies on point estimates alone; the ranges in parentheses overlap substantially. Concentrations are on a mass basis, with no correction for molar mass.
Show datacompound-tetrahydro-iso-alpha-acids —has_lower_human_detection_threshold_than→ compound-iso-alpha-acids
claim: clm-tetrahydro-iso-lower-threshold / type: sensory / updated: 2026-08-30

For quinine hydrochloride, the order of these two stages itself becomes unsteady. A 2019 study reported the recognition threshold as about 0.011-0.018 mM (-1.737 to -1.980 in log10 value). Yet a 2026 study reports the detection threshold — which should use a looser criterion — as 0.264-0.809 mg/mL (about 0.67-2.0 mM). The detection threshold should be at or below the recognition threshold, but lining up these two shows a shift of roughly 2 orders of magnitude in the higher direction. The 2026 study has n=79/78, and both the concentration series and the spray range differ from the 2019 study; neither paper pins down the reason for the divergence.

quinine has a reported human taste threshold of About 0.011-0.018 mM (recognition threshold, QUEST/qYN, 2019) versus 0.264-0.809 mg/mL ≈ 0.67-2.0 mM (detection threshold, QUEST, 2026) — the detection threshold should be ≤ the recognition threshold, yet the two diverge by roughly 2 orders of magnitude in the higher directioncontested

Scope: Human psychophysical measurement in healthy adults. Both studies presented quinine hydrochloride by spraying it onto the anterior tongue (2019: about 0.2 mL of mist onto the front half; 2026: a spray onto the front 2/3)

Note: The molar conversion (mg/mL → mM, using an anhydrous quinine HCl MW of ≈360.9) is our own derived value. The methods (detection vs. recognition, concentration series, judgment procedure) and panels differ (n=41, mean age 30 vs. n=100, ages 33-57, 86% female). Within Juratli 2026 alone, the value moves by about 3-fold from test 0.809 to retest 0.264 mg/mL. A case in point that no single 「キニーネ閾値」 (in translation: "quinine threshold") exists.

Recognition threshold for quinine hydrochloride (log10 mM): QUEST test -1.737 (SD 1.101), retest -1.889 (SD 0.953). qYN test -1.974 (SD 0.952), retest -1.980 (SD 0.962) — that is, about 0.010-0.018 mM. Stimulus: about 0.2 mL of mist sprayed onto the front half of the tongue. The concentration series ran across 21 log10 steps from 0.077e-3 mM to 3.131 mM.
Limitations: A recognition, not detection, criterion. A young sample with normal BMI. A test-retest SD of about 1 log unit indicates substantial between-person variability.
Source: Repeatability of Taste Recognition Threshold Measurements with QUEST and Quick Yes-No (Höchenberger R; Ohla K, 2019) · full text checked
Contradicts: QUEST spray detection threshold for quinine hydrochloride: test 0.809 (± 0.374) mg/mL, retest 0.264 (± 0.082) mg/mL (the ± as given in the table header; n=79/78), with the solution sprayed onto the front two-thirds of the tongue; the series ran across 18 levels from 0.00015-1.23 mg/mL. Despite using a looser detection criterion, these values are roughly 2 orders of magnitude higher than the 2019 recognition threshold, and test and retest differ by about 3-fold even within the same study.
Limitations: Differs from the 2019 study in concentration series, spray volume and coverage area, and population; an ICC of 0.567 indicates moderate reproducibility; the direction of the discrepancy (detection higher than recognition) is our own comparison, and neither paper discusses it.
Source: Comparison of techniques for the evaluation of taste sensitivity (Juratli JH; Kaeb I; Haehner A; Hummel T, 2026) · full text checked
Show datacompound-quinine —has_reported_human_taste_threshold_of→ "About 0.011-0.018 mM (recognition threshold, QUEST/qYN, 2019) versus 0.264-0.809 mg/mL ≈ 0.67-2.0 mM (detection threshold, QUEST, 2026) — the detection threshold should be ≤ the recognition threshold, yet the two diverge by roughly 2 orders of magnitude in the higher direction"
claim: clm-quinine-hcl-threshold-reports / type: sensory / updated: 2026-08-30

The spread between compounds, and the spread between individuals

That thresholds differ in order of magnitude between different compounds is only to be expected, but even within the same compound, the spread between people can exceed that. For TAS2R38, the receptor that divides bitterness sensitivity to PTC (phenylthiocarbamide), 5 worldwide haplotypes formed by 3 SNPs in the coding region explain 55-85% of the variance in PTC sensitivity among unrelated subjects. Mean thresholds spread by more than 40-fold between compounds, distributed from about 50 µM for PTC to about 2000 µM for sinigrin, but individual variation within a single compound reached 40-fold for salicin, goitrin, and sinigrin, and 8000-fold for PTC — the individual variation within PTC alone is larger than the spread between compounds.

TAS2R38 explains the bimodal individual variation in phenylthiocarbamideestablished

Scope: Linkage-disequilibrium mapping in unrelated subjects (Kim 2003), genotype-stratified psychophysics (Bufe 2005), threshold phenotyping across 6 haplotypes (Behrens 2013)

A small region on chromosome 7 at 7q shows strong linkage disequilibrium between SNP markers and PTC taste sensitivity in unrelated subjects; this region contains a single TAS2R gene with 3 coding SNPs, giving rise to 5 haplotypes worldwide. These haplotypes fully explain the bimodal distribution of PTC taste sensitivity and account for 55–85% of the variance in PTC sensitivity.
Limitations: Abstract level: the sample size, the population behind the 55–85% range, and the phenotype values for each haplotype are not given in the abstract. The full text in Science is not accessible.
Source: Positional cloning of the human quantitative trait locus underlying taste sensitivity to phenylthiocarbamide (Kim UK; Jorgenson E; Coon H; Leppert M; Risch N; Drayna D, 2003) · abstract checked
Suprathreshold PTC intensity functions showed a clear separation between every AVI/AVI function and every PAV/PAV function, and all diplotype groups differed significantly from one another at every PTC concentration (p < 0.001).
Limitations: The sample per diplotype group is small. Heterozygotes are intermediate in PTC intensity but resemble PAV/PAV in recognition threshold, so which phenotype is measured matters.
Source: The molecular basis of individual differences in phenylthiocarbamide and propylthiouracil bitterness perception (Bufe B; Breslin PA; Kuhn C; Reed DR; Tharp CD; Slack JP; Kim UK; Drayna D; Meyerhof W, 2005) · full text checked
In 56 subjects covering the 6 TAS2R38 haplotypes, the association with detection thresholds for 4 thioamide compounds (PTC, PROP, goitrin, and methimazole) was strongly significant, at P<0.005 and β>1.85 for all 3 SNPs, and P<0.001 for the PAV/AVI haplotype. For sinigrin (only a subpopulation of N=25), all 3 SNPs were also statistically significant, but the P-values, at 0.03–0.04, were higher than for the thioamide compounds, and the authors point to insufficient power from the small sample.
Limitations: Abstract level. Haplotypes other than PAV and AVI showed no association with phenotype, which the authors attribute to their low frequency. It is used here to read the correspondence between genotype and threshold.
Source: Genetic, functional, and phenotypic diversity in TAS2R38-mediated bitter taste perception (Behrens M; Gunn HC; Ramos PC; Meyerhof W; Wooding SP, 2013) · full text checked
Context: Mean thresholds varied more than 40-fold among compounds (from about 50 µM for PTC to about 2000 µM for sinigrin), and within-compound individual variation ranged from 40-fold for salicin, goitrin, and sinigrin to 8000-fold for PTC. Verbatim: "Mean thresholds varied more than 40-fold among compounds, from a minimum of ~50 µM (PTC) to a maximum of ~2000 µM (sinigrin), whereas within-compound threshold ranges varied from 40-fold (salicin, goitrin, and sinigrin) to 8000-fold (PTC) (Figure 2)."
Limitations: The number of subjects differs by compound (sinigrin uses only a subpopulation).
Source: Genetic, functional, and phenotypic diversity in TAS2R38-mediated bitter taste perception (Behrens M; Gunn HC; Ramos PC; Meyerhof W; Wooding SP, 2013) · full text checked
Show datareceptor-tas2r38 —explains_bimodal_variation_in→ compound-ptc
claim: clm-tas2r38-explains-ptc-sensitivity / type: mechanism / updated: 2026-08-30

PROP is often used as a stand-in for PTC, but its behavior differs even when compared within the same TAS2R38 genotype. In an experiment that stratified 32 subjects by PAV/AVI type and defined the recognition threshold as the 75% correct point on the psychometric function, the difference between PAV/PAV and AVI/AVI exceeded 400-fold for PTC, while for PROP it stayed at 40-fold.

6-n-propylthiouracil is not perceptually interchangeable with phenylthiocarbamidesupported

Scope: 32 subjects with known TAS2R38 diplotypes were tested with concentration series of both compounds. Threshold was defined as the 75% point on the psychometric function

Note: A mechanistic caveat about the practice of using PROP as a substitute for PTC. The direct basis is that 2 AVI/AVI subjects responded strongly to PROP while 2 PAV/PAV subjects showed almost no response.

The threshold, defined as the 75% correct point (inflection point) on the psychometric function, differed by more than 400-fold between PAV/PAV and AVI/AVI for PTC, but by only 40-fold for PROP. The concentration-intensity function for PROP did not separate by haplotype as clearly as the PTC ratings did. The observation that 2 AVI/AVI subjects responded strongly to PROP while 2 PAV/PAV subjects showed almost no response strongly suggests that suprathreshold PROP sensitivity is under additional genetic and environmental control.
Limitations: The paper avoids quantifying the total variance explained. The authors suggest that variation among heterozygotes may reflect variation in the mRNA ratio of PAV and AVI transcripts, but this remains a proposed mechanism.
Source: The molecular basis of individual differences in phenylthiocarbamide and propylthiouracil bitterness perception (Bufe B; Breslin PA; Kuhn C; Reed DR; Tharp CD; Slack JP; Kim UK; Drayna D; Meyerhof W, 2005) · full text checked
Show datacompound-prop —is_not_perceptually_interchangeable_with→ compound-ptc
claim: clm-prop-ptc-not-interchangeable / type: sensory / updated: 2026-08-30

The size of individual variation itself also differs between compounds. In a study that measured the stimulus thresholds of 4 taste substances by Pfaffmann's single-point identification method in 28 brewing-course trainees (19-40 years old) at the National Tax Agency's Brewing Research Institute, mean thresholds were glucose 4.69×10⁻²M, malic acid 1.9×10⁻⁴M, salt 1.26×10⁻²M, and quinine sulfate 7.2×10⁻⁶M (equivalent to 0.0006%). Of the 4 substances, individual variation (coefficient of variation, σ/x̄×100) was largest for quinine sulfate, reaching 136%.

quinine has human taste thresholds of Mean detection threshold 7.2×10⁻⁶M (quinine sulfate, equivalent to 0.0006%)supported

Scope: Measured by Pfaffmann's single-point identification method in 28 trainees (19-40 years old, mean 25.61, including 1 woman) attending the 78th brewing course at the National Tax Agency's Brewing Research Institute. Of the 4 taste substances (glucose, malic acid, salt, quinine sulfate), quinine sulfate showed the largest individual variation, with a coefficient of variation (σ/x̄×100) reaching 136%. Subjects sensitive to quinine sulfate also tended to be sensitive to malic acid and salt.

Note: Oba et al. (1984). Note that this is baseline data for training and standardizing the discrimination ability of an alcoholic-beverage tasting panel (including sake), rather than a measurement of sake itself.

Mean stimulus thresholds for the 4 substances were: glucose 4.69×10⁻²M, malic acid 1.9×10⁻⁴M, salt 1.26×10⁻²M, and quinine sulfate 7.2×10⁻⁶M. There was individual variation in sensitivity to the 4 tastes, and subjects sensitive to quinine sulfate tended to also be sensitive to malic acid and salt.
Limitations: This is a baseline threshold measurement for training an alcoholic-beverage tasting panel, not a sensory evaluation of sake itself.
Show datacompound-quinine —has_human_taste_thresholds_of→ "Mean detection threshold 7.2×10⁻⁶M (quinine sulfate, equivalent to 0.0006%)"
claim: clm-quinine-threshold-panelist-training / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-01

Even just within a group of closely related compounds, the spread opens up widely. Tricyclic and tetracyclic conversion products of iso-alpha acids that arise during beer storage (such as tricyclocohumol) had reported threshold concentrations scattered across a range of 5 to 70 µmol/L.

Scope: trans-specific conversion products formed during beer aging. Quantified in stored commercial beer

Note: Explains the change in the quality (not only intensity) of beer bitterness with storage. The threshold range given in the abstract is for the compound set, not per-compound values.

Tricyclocohumol, tricyclocohumene, isotricyclocohumene, tetracyclocohumol, and epitetracyclocohumol were identified as previously unknown trans-specific iso-α-acid conversion products. The abstract states that these compounds show a harsh, lingering bitterness with threshold concentrations ranging from 5 to 70 µmol/L, and their formation during beer aging was confirmed by HPLC-MS/MS.
Limitations: Abstract-level extraction. The 5-70 µmol/L range is given for the compound set as a whole, with no per-compound assignment. The solvent or matrix, number of panelists, and threshold method for the threshold test are not stated in the abstract.
Source: Structures of storage-induced transformation products of the beer's bitter principles, revealed by sophisticated NMR spectroscopic and LC-MS techniques (Intelmann D; Kummerlöwe G; Haseleu G; Desmer N; Schulze K; Fröhlich R; Frank O; Luy B; Hofmann T, 2009) · abstract checked
Quantitative LC-MS/MS profiling of 56 hop-derived sensometabolites found that proton-catalyzed cyclization of trans-iso-α-acids is the quantitatively dominant reaction, generating tricyclic and tetracyclic compounds (tricyclocohumol, tricyclocohumene, isotricyclocohumene, tetracyclocohumol, epitetracyclocohumol) with a persistent, harsh bitterness, and that these accumulate in beer as storage time and temperature increase. The authors propose controlling the beer's initial pH and keeping storage temperature low to delay the onset of the harsh bitter aftertaste.
Limitations: Abstract-level extraction. The number of beers, storage temperature, duration, and pH values are not stated in the abstract. The recommendations on pH and temperature are the authors' inference from the chemistry, not a reported sensory storage trial.
Source: Comprehensive sensomics analysis of hop-derived bitter compounds during storage of beer (Intelmann D; Haseleu G; Dunkel A; Lagemann A; Stephan A; Hofmann T, 2011) · abstract checked
Context: An independent group quantified the degradation of trans-iso-α-acids during storage of commercial lager beer by HPLC, derived kinetic parameters (activation energy, rate constant), and concluded that the iso-α-acid loss 'can be used in the beer industry to predict the alteration of the bitterness of beer during storage.' This independently confirms the precursor chemistry (storage-driven trans-iso-α-acid loss) behind the harsh-bitterness conversion products.
Limitations: Does not identify tricyclic or tetracyclic conversion products or conduct a sensory test. The sensory attribution of the harsh, lingering bitterness to those compounds still relies solely on the Munich (Intelmann/Hofmann) group.
Source: Prediction of the ageing of commercial lager beer during storage based on the degradation of iso-α-acids (Blanco CA; Nimubona D; Caballero I, 2014) · abstract checked
Show datacompound-class-iso-alpha-acid-cyclization-products —contributes_to→ sensation-bitter
claim: clm-storage-harsh-bitter-products / type: processing / updated: 2026-08-30

Even for the conversion products formed by heating hop beta acids under wort-boiling conditions, recognition thresholds spread from 7.9 to 90.3 µmol/L. The lowest, cohulupone (7.9 µmol/L), is described as a short-lasting, iso-alpha-acid-like bitterness, while hydroxytricyclocolupone (14.7 µmol/L) is described as a coarse bitterness that lingers long at the back of the tongue and in the throat.

Scope: Beta-acid transformation products from heat treatment of colupulone under wort-boiling conditions. Subsequently quantified in commercial beer

Note: Shows that not only alpha-acid derivatives but also hop beta-acids contribute measurable bitterness, and that even at similar threshold magnitudes, the temporal quality differs among homologs. Panel size and threshold method are not stated in the abstract.

Heat treatment of the hop beta-acid colupulone under wort-boiling conditions gave cohulupone, hulupinic acid, nortricyclocolupone, and multiple tricyclocolupone epimer pairs as the main bitter products. Depending on structure, the recognition threshold ranged from 7.9 to 90.3 µmol/L. The lowest were cohulupone at 7.9 µmol/L (described as a short-lasting, iso-alpha-acid-like bitterness) and hydroxytricyclocolupone at 14.7 µmol/L (described as a long-lingering, prickly bitterness perceived at the back of the tongue and throat). Concentrations differed markedly between beer types.
Limitations: Abstract-level extraction. Panel size, threshold method, and tasting matrix are not stated in the abstract, and no DoT (dose-over-threshold) calculation is reported, so the abstract does not establish that these compounds actually exceed threshold in the beers analyzed.
Show datacompound-class-beta-acid-transformation-products —contributes_to→ sensation-bitter
claim: clm-beta-acid-products-bitter / type: sensory / updated: 2026-08-30

In a study that fractionated and identified Class III (ammonia caramel) coloring by bitterness, the threshold concentrations of the 4 compounds DDMP, HMF, furfural, and 5-methylfurfural were reported as 14.3, 30.0, 4.4, and 17.5 µmol/L respectively.

caramel colours — key compounds involved in bitterness: Sensory-guided fractionation and identification, using bitterness as the index, was carried out on commercial Class III (ammonia caramel) coloring, and 4 compounds — DDMP (2,3-dihydro-3,5-dihydroxy-6-methyl-4(H)-pyran-4-one), HMF (5-hydroxymethylfurfural), furfural, and 5-methylfurfural (MF) — were isolated and structurally identified as the main bitter compounds. Their threshold concentrations are reported as 14.3, 30.0, 4.4, and 17.5 µmol/L respectively. DMFM and TMP were also separately identified as volatile bitter compounds.supported

Scope: A sensory-guided fractionation study of commercial Class III caramel coloring

Note: This is a finding for Class III (ammonia caramel), 1 regulatory class among several, and cannot be extrapolated to Class I/II/IV, or to non-standardized caramelization occurring through heating in food in general.

Bitterness-guided fractionation and identification isolated and structurally determined 4 major bitter compounds (DDMP, HMF, furfural, 5-methylfurfural) and reported their bitterness threshold concentrations (14.3/30.0/4.4/17.5 µmol/L). DMFM and TMP were also identified as volatile bitter compounds.
Limitations: The publisher's site returned a 403 error, so the full text could not be accessed directly; the content was confirmed through agreement among bibliographic records and abstract-level descriptions on multiple independent academic databases. Final confirmation of the figures requires checking against the paper's full text.
Source: Identification of bitter-taste compounds in class-III caramel colours (Li H; Zhang WC; Tang XY; Wu CJ; Yu SJ; Zhao ZQ, 2021) · abstract checked
Show datacompound-class-caramel-colours —has_key_bitter_organoleptics→ "Sensory-guided fractionation and identification, using bitterness as the index, was carried out on commercial Class III (ammonia caramel) coloring, and 4 compounds — DDMP (2,3-dihydro-3,5-dihydroxy-6-methyl-4(H)-pyran-4-one), HMF (5-hydroxymethylfurfural), furfural, and 5-methylfurfural (MF) — were isolated and structurally identified as the main bitter compounds. Their threshold concentrations are reported as 14.3, 30.0, 4.4, and 17.5 µmol/L respectively. DMFM and TMP were also separately identified as volatile bitter compounds."
claim: clm-caramel-class3-bitter-compounds / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-02

Even for the 12 peptides purified and synthesized from aged Gouda cheese, recognition thresholds were distributed from 0.05 to 6.0 mmol/L, and the lowest, the decapeptide YPFPGPIHNS, had a caffeine-like bitter quality at 0.05 mmol/L.

bitter peptides — recognition thresholds: 0.05-6.0 mmol/L (12 synthesized and purified peptides showed clear bitterness). The lowest threshold was 0.05 mmol/L, for the decapeptide YPFPGPIHNS, with a caffeine-like bitterness quality.supported

Scope: Peptides purified from aged Gouda cheese and then synthesized.

Note: The abstract gives neither the threshold-measurement method nor the panel size.

In sensory evaluation of the purified and synthesized peptides, 12 showed clear bitterness, with recognition thresholds of 0.05-6.0 mmol/L. The decapeptide YPFPGPIHNS had a caffeine-like bitterness quality and the lowest threshold, 0.05 mmol/L.
Limitations: The abstract gives neither the panel size nor the threshold-measurement procedure.
Source: Sensomics mapping and identification of the key bitter metabolites in Gouda cheese (Toelstede S; Hofmann T, 2008) · abstract checked
Context: Verbatim: 'the synthetic peptides exhibited a bitter taste with threshold values 0.25 and 0.16mM'. The 2 synthesized hydrophobic peptides correspond to bovine β-casein f61-67 (H-Pro-Phe-Pro-Gly-Pro-Ile-Pro-OH) and f60-66, chosen as a common portion of bitter peptides isolated from cheese. In this way, an independent group also places the threshold of casein-derived cheese bitter peptides in the same sub-mM-to-mM range as the Gouda set (0.05-6.0 mmol/L).
Limitations: Because this is a different peptide from the Gouda set (a middle portion of β-casein rather than the C-terminal Gouda-derived decapeptide), what it corroborates is the order of magnitude, not the individual value. The abstract does not give the panel size or the threshold procedure.
Limits: The taste of the synthetic peptides was judged by a panel of 4 people, and the threshold was reported as a ratio relative to caffeine as the reference substance (Rcaf). As the peptide was shortened from the full-length form, the threshold concentration rose monotonically (bitterness weakened). Verbatim: "The taste of a synthetic peptide was organoleptically determined by panel evaluation involving four people. The threshold value of bitterness was compared with that of caffeine, which was employed as a standard bitter substance, and the ratio was expressed as"
Limitations: The panel size is small, and this is not an absolute threshold.
Show datacompound-class-bitter-peptides —has_recognition_thresholds_of→ "0.05-6.0 mmol/L (12 synthesized and purified peptides showed clear bitterness). The lowest threshold was 0.05 mmol/L, for the decapeptide YPFPGPIHNS, with a caffeine-like bitterness quality."
claim: clm-gouda-peptide-thresholds / type: sensory / updated: 2026-08-30

And even at the compound level, the number itself is not necessarily fixed at one. For mozambioside, a bitter compound specific to coffee beans, a 2015 abstract reported the recognition threshold in aqueous solution as 60±10 µM, while a 2025 abstract from a related research lineage reports 132 µM. Even for the same compound and a closely related lab lineage, a gap of roughly 2.2-fold remains.

mozambioside — bitter recognition threshold: 60±10 µM (2015) and 132 µM (2025) — roughly a 2-fold discrepancy within the same lineage of laboratoriescontested

Scope: Human recognition threshold in aqueous solution

Note: NIGAMI LAB's first contested claim. The threshold is panel- and method-dependent, an example that it cannot be treated as a single fixed value.

Mozambioside's bitterness recognition threshold is 60±10 µmol/L.
Limitations: Only the abstract was checked.
Source: Mozambioside Is an Arabica-Specific Bitter-Tasting Furokaurane Glucoside in Coffee Beans (Lang R; Klade S; Beusch A; Dunkel A; Hofmann T, 2015) · abstract checked
Contradicts: Reports the threshold of the same compound as 132 µM — about 2.2 times the 60±10 µM reported in 2015. Panel, purity, and methodological differences are candidate causes.
Limitations: Only the abstract was checked. The cause of the discrepancy cannot be identified from either abstract alone.
Source: Contribution of mozambioside roasting products to coffee's bitter taste (Bichlmaier C; Froehlich SM; Brychcy V; Grassl A; Behrens M; Lang R, 2025) · abstract checked
Show datacompound-mozambioside —has_bitter_recognition_threshold→ "60±10 µM (2015) and 132 µM (2025) — roughly a 2-fold discrepancy within the same lineage of laboratories"
claim: clm-mozambioside-threshold / type: sensory / updated: 2026-08-30

Trained panels and the general public

Many of the numbers so far come not from the broad general population, but from small trained panels or industry reference-sample-building. In research on glutelin-derived peptides in sake, the 5 purified peptides (peaks 9, 13, 17, 18, 20) had detection thresholds of 0.02-0.18 mM and recognition thresholds of 0.08-0.66 mM (geometric mean of 6 evaluators). An index dividing the actual concentration in sake by the recognition threshold fell in the range of 6 to 60.

sake bitter peptides from rice glutelin — bitter recognition threshold: 5 purified isolated peptides (peaks 9,13,17,18,20) had detection thresholds of 0.02-0.18 mM and recognition thresholds of 0.08-0.66 mM (geometric mean of 6 assessors). Taste characteristics differed by peak: "bitterness, unpleasant aftertaste," "bitterness, egumi," "egumi, bitterness, zatsumi (off-taste)," and so on. The index of concentration in sake divided by recognition threshold (a gauge of contribution to taste) ranged from 6 to 60.supported

Note: Hashizume (2008), Table 5. Evaluation of a purified preparation dissolved in a 15% ethanol solution.

The isolated peptides had detection thresholds of 0.02-0.18 mM and recognition thresholds of 0.08-0.66 mM (geometric mean of 6 assessors). Taste characteristics and the index of concentration in sake divided by recognition threshold (6-60) are recorded.
Limitations: A small panel of 6 assessors.
Show datacompound-class-sake-glutelin-peptides —has_bitter_recognition_threshold→ "5 purified isolated peptides (peaks 9,13,17,18,20) had detection thresholds of 0.02-0.18 mM and recognition thresholds of 0.08-0.66 mM (geometric mean of 6 assessors). Taste characteristics differed by peak: "bitterness, unpleasant aftertaste," "bitterness, egumi," "egumi, bitterness, zatsumi (off-taste)," and so on. The index of concentration in sake divided by recognition threshold (a gauge of contribution to taste) ranged from 6 to 60."
claim: clm-sake-glutelin-bitter-peptide-thresholds / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-01

In a sake flavor-vocabulary system compiled with the cooperation of bodies including the Japan Sake and Shochu Makers Association, tyrosol is assigned as the standard reference sample for 『苦味』 (in translation: "bitterness"), with the discrimination threshold (detection) set at 1.4 g/L and the standard addition amount at 4.9 g/L. The tyrosol content in sake is 70-90 mg/L, which stays at a level far below this detection threshold.

sake has a standardized vocabulary entry in The sake flavour-quality assessment vocabulary of Utsunomiya et al. (2006) (compiled by the National Research Institute of Brewing with the cooperation of the Japan Sake and Shochu Makers Association, the Nada Sake Research Association, and the Fushimi Brewers' Friendship Society)supported

Scope: In the vocabulary's class "13. Bitterness" / the term "bitterness," defined as "bitter," the standard reference sample is set as tyrosol (2-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)ethyl alcohol, TCI 98%+). Detection threshold 1.4 g/L, standard addition level 4.9 g/L, content in sake 70-90 mg/L.

The standard reference sample for the term "bitterness" (defined as "bitter") is tyrosol (TCI 98%+). Detection threshold 1.4 g/L, standard addition level 4.9 g/L, content in sake 70-90 mg/L.
Show dataingredient-sake —has_standardized_vocabulary_entry_in→ "The sake flavour-quality assessment vocabulary of Utsunomiya et al. (2006) (compiled by the National Research Institute of Brewing with the cooperation of the Japan Sake and Shochu Makers Association, the Nada Sake Research Association, and the Fushimi Brewers' Friendship Society)"
claim: clm-sake-bitterness-standardized-vocabulary / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-01

In the beer flavor-vocabulary system too, item number 1200 for bitterness selects the isohumulone preparation Isolone, and is described as 『他の風味成分が少ない典型的な苦味』 (in translation: "a typical bitterness with few other flavor components") and 『閾値は正規分布を示す』 (in translation: "the threshold shows a normal distribution").

Beer Flavor Wheel is defined as "1200 BITTER. The preparation Isolone® (Kalsec Inc., Kalamazoo, MI 49005) gave a typical bitter flavor with a minimum of other flavors. Thresholds were normally distributed."supported

Scope: Meilgaard, Reid & Wyborski (1982), "Individual Standards," the 1200 BITTER entry

Adopted the iso-humulone-type preparation Isolone (Kalsec Inc.) as the bitter reference substance, and reported that it "gave a typical bitter flavor with a minimum of other flavors" and that "Thresholds were normally distributed."
Limitations: The paper as a whole reports on the selection of 27 reference substances; the detailed statistical treatment specific to Bitter alone remains a brief description.
Source: Reference Standards for Beer Flavor Terminology System (M. C. Meilgaard; D. S. Reid; K. A. Wyborski, 1982) · full text checked
Show dataconcept-beer-flavor-wheel —is_defined_as→ ""1200 BITTER. The preparation Isolone® (Kalsec Inc., Kalamazoo, MI 49005) gave a typical bitter flavor with a minimum of other flavors. Thresholds were normally distributed.""
claim: clm-w59d-beerwheel-bitter-standard / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-04

Two actual group-threshold records remain: 7.3 mg/L with 16 tasters in the Difference Rating Test, and 5.7 mg/L with 18 tasters in the A.S.T.M. ascending method using unhopped beer. Even for the same reference substance, the number moves when the method and the panel size change.

Beer Flavor Wheel is documented as having 『1200 Bitter / Isohumulone (Kalsec Isolone) / Threshold: 7.3 mg/L』 (collaborator C-22, 16 panelists) and 『5.7 mg/L』 (collaborator C-22, 18 panelists, noted as 『Three tests, unhopped beer』). As the group thresholds for the bitterness reference substance isohumulone, 7.3 mg/L and 5.7 mg/L are reported across the two test methods.supported

Scope: Meilgaard, Reid & Wyborski (1982) Table II

Note: Measured using the A.S.T.M. Ascending Method of Limits. Panel size 16-18 panelists.

The 1200 Bitter row of Table II: sample 『Isohumulone (Kalsec Isolone)』, threshold 『7.3 mg/L』 (Difference Rating Test, collaborator C-22, 16 tasters), followed by the next row 『Same』, threshold 『5.7 mg/L』 (A.S.T.M. Ascending Method of Limits Test, collaborator C-22, 18 tasters, noted 『Three tests, unhopped beer』).
Limitations: The full text does not give details of the beer brand or brewing conditions used.
Source: Reference Standards for Beer Flavor Terminology System (M. C. Meilgaard; D. S. Reid; K. A. Wyborski, 1982) · full text checked
Show dataconcept-beer-flavor-wheel —is_documented_as_having→ "『1200 Bitter / Isohumulone (Kalsec Isolone) / Threshold: 7.3 mg/L』 (collaborator C-22, 16 panelists) and 『5.7 mg/L』 (collaborator C-22, 18 panelists, noted as 『Three tests, unhopped beer』). As the group thresholds for the bitterness reference substance isohumulone, 7.3 mg/L and 5.7 mg/L are reported across the two test methods."
claim: clm-w59d-beerwheel-bitter-threshold / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-04

The threshold of the same substance moves with the medium

Values dissolved in water, and values in actual drinks or food, are not the same either. Limonin, a citrus bitter compound, has a threshold of 1 mg/L in distilled water. But in pH 3.8 orange juice the maximum discrimination threshold rises to 6.5 mg/kg, and the maximum value of 11 mg/kg in a model solution also occurred at the same pH 3.8.

limonin — bitter recognition threshold: 1 mg/L in distilled water. Maximum recognition threshold of 6.5 mg/kg in orange juice at pH 3.8supported

Scope: A panel of 20-27 screened judges. Distilled water, sucrose, and citric acid model systems, and orange juice

Note: Sucrose and citric acid raise the threshold. In both the model systems and the juice, the pH optimum for suppression is 3.8. Later debittering literature cites the 6.5 ppm juice value from this same lineage.

The threshold in distilled water was 1 mg/l for limonin and 20 mg/l for naringin. The maximum recognition threshold for limonin in orange juice was 6.5 mg/kg, occurring at pH 3.8, and the maximum value of 11 mg/kg in the model system also occurred at pH 3.8.
Limitations: Abstract only; panel procedure details and inter-individual variation cannot be read.
Source: Effect of some citrus juice constituents on taste thresholds for limonin and naringin bitterness (Guadagni DG; Maier VP; Turnbaugh JG, 1973) · abstract checked
Context: States that the threshold of limonin in orange juice is affected by pH, and is 6.5 ppm at pH 3.8.
Limitations: A secondhand citation of the Guadagni lineage, not an independent measurement.
Show datacompound-limonin —has_bitter_recognition_threshold→ "1 mg/L in distilled water. Maximum recognition threshold of 6.5 mg/kg in orange juice at pH 3.8"
claim: clm-limonin-threshold / type: sensory / updated: 2026-08-30

The naringin threshold in distilled water from the same study was 20 mg/L. A separate debittering study describes an immediate bitterness arising in juice once the concentration exceeds 20 ppm.

naringin — bitter recognition threshold: 20 mg/L in distilled water. In juice, it is stated that immediate bitterness arises once naringin exceeds about 20 ppmsupported

Scope: The value in water comes from a panel of 20-27 screened judges. The statement about juice derives from debittering literature citing the same lineage

Naringin's threshold in distilled water was 20 mg/l. No clear pH optimum for naringin bitterness suppression was reported (limonin's optimum is pH 3.8).
Limitations: Abstract only. The naringin threshold in a juice matrix is not given in the abstract that could be read.
Source: Effect of some citrus juice constituents on taste thresholds for limonin and naringin bitterness (Guadagni DG; Maier VP; Turnbaugh JG, 1973) · abstract checked
Context: States that naringin is extracted into the juice from the membranes and the albedo, and that once its concentration exceeds 20 ppm it gives an immediate bitterness.
Limitations: A secondhand citation (the source text has the misspelling 'narinigin'). Not an independent sensory measurement.
Show datacompound-naringin —has_bitter_recognition_threshold→ "20 mg/L in distilled water. In juice, it is stated that immediate bitterness arises once naringin exceeds about 20 ppm"
claim: clm-naringin-threshold / type: sensory / updated: 2026-08-30

Even for bitter gourd's bitter compounds, the medium is a solvent in which the purified compound is dissolved. Charantoside B's recognition threshold is reported as 13.6 ppm in 3% ethanol.

charantoside B elicits bitternesssupported

Scope: Purified compound in 3% ethanol, in the threshold study cited

Note: Threshold and contribution are matrix-specific.

The reported recognition threshold for charantoside B is 13.6 ppm in 3% ethanol, and it was a major contributor according to dose-over-threshold analysis.
Limitations: This is a threshold in solution, not an intensity value for the whole fruit.
Source: Major Bitter-Tasting Compounds from the Dichloromethane Fraction of Bitter Gourd (Fruit of Momordica charantia L.) Extract and Their Precursors (Cai X; Lin Z; Zheng Q; Liao M; Li H; Feng H; Chen H; Zhang Y; Chen X; Liang D, 2024) · abstract checked
Show datacompound-charantoside-b —elicits→ sensation-bitter
claim: clm-charantoside-elicits-bitter / type: sensory / updated: 2026-08-30

Momordicine IV, too, as a purified compound in the same 3% ethanol, was identified as a major contributor showing strong bitterness. Both are values for a purified compound dissolved in a solvent, not the intensity of the raw fruit itself.

momordicine IV elicits bitternesssupported

Scope: Purified compound in 3% ethanol, in the threshold study cited

Note: Threshold and contribution are matrix-specific.

A sensory-guided study showed that momordicine IV exhibits a strong bitterness and was identified, through dose-over-threshold analysis, as a major contributor.
Limitations: The exact threshold should be extracted from the full text before publishing the number.
Source: Major Bitter-Tasting Compounds from the Dichloromethane Fraction of Bitter Gourd (Fruit of Momordica charantia L.) Extract and Their Precursors (Cai X; Lin Z; Zheng Q; Liao M; Li H; Feng H; Chen H; Zhang Y; Chen X; Liang D, 2024) · abstract checked
Show datacompound-momordicine-iv —elicits→ sensation-bitter
claim: clm-momordicine-elicits-bitter / type: sensory / updated: 2026-08-30

The difference between a pure standard solution and actual food is also confirmed in uruka, 「うるか」 (in translation: "uruka"), a fermented ayu-entrails food. In a standard cholic acid solution, all 6 testers perceived bitterness at 8×10⁻⁴M, and sweetness also began to be perceived at 32×10⁻⁴M. In a standard taurocholic acid solution, bitterness was at 4×10⁻⁴M and sweetness at 16×10⁻⁴M.

3α,7α,12α-trihydroxy-5β-cholan-24-oic acid — bitter recognition threshold: In a sensory test using a standard cholic acid solution (6 testers), the concentration at which all testers perceived bitterness was 8×10⁻⁴M. Separately from bitterness, the concentration at which sweetness began to be perceived was 32×10⁻⁴M.supported

Scope: A 1982 study (standard cholic acid solution, 6 testers)

Reports a bitterness discrimination threshold of 8×10⁻⁴M for the standard cholic acid solution, and an initial concentration of 32×10⁻⁴M at which sweetness begins to be perceived.
Limitations: Evaluation by a small in-house panel.
Source: 「うるか」の苦味成分の検索 ―とくに胆汁酸に関連して― (遠藤幸子; 綾木義和, 1982) · full text checked
Show datacompound-cholic-acid —has_bitter_recognition_threshold→ "In a sensory test using a standard cholic acid solution (6 testers), the concentration at which all testers perceived bitterness was 8×10⁻⁴M. Separately from bitterness, the concentration at which sweetness began to be perceived was 32×10⁻⁴M."
claim: clm-cholic-acid-bitter-threshold / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-02
3α,7α,12α-trihydroxy-5β-cholan-24-oyltaurine — bitter recognition threshold: In a sensory test using a standard taurocholic acid solution (6 testers), the concentration at which all testers perceived bitterness was 4×10⁻⁴M. Separately from bitterness, the concentration at which sweetness began to be perceived was 16×10⁻⁴M. Taurocholic acid was isolated from ayu gallbladder bile in a 1939 study by Ohta.supported

Scope: A 1982 study (standard taurocholic acid solution, 6 testers)

Reports a bitterness discrimination threshold of 4×10⁻⁴M for the standard taurocholic acid solution, and an initial concentration of 16×10⁻⁴M at which sweetness begins to be perceived.
Limitations: Evaluation by a small in-house panel.
Source: 「うるか」の苦味成分の検索 ―とくに胆汁酸に関連して― (遠藤幸子; 綾木義和, 1982) · full text checked
Show datacompound-taurocholic-acid —has_bitter_recognition_threshold→ "In a sensory test using a standard taurocholic acid solution (6 testers), the concentration at which all testers perceived bitterness was 4×10⁻⁴M. Separately from bitterness, the concentration at which sweetness began to be perceived was 16×10⁻⁴M. Taurocholic acid was isolated from ayu gallbladder bile in a 1939 study by Ohta."
claim: clm-taurocholic-acid-bitter-threshold / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-02

But in the total bile-acid fraction derived from 「うるか」 (in translation: "uruka"), mixing the free form and the taurine-conjugated form at a molar ratio of 17.5:5.5, the same 6 testers needed 8×10⁻⁴M in cholic-acid-equivalent concentration before all of them perceived bitterness — a higher value than the 4×10⁻⁴M discrimination threshold of a standard mixed solution at the same composition ratio. The sweetness that was perceived in the standard solution was also not perceived, within the tested range, in the uruka-derived fraction.

uruka (salted, fermented ayu entrails) — bitter recognition threshold: A sensory test on the total bile-acid fraction extracted from uruka found that all 6 assessors perceived bitterness at a concentration of 8×10⁻⁴M expressed as cholic acid (with a free-form to taurine-conjugated molar ratio of 17.5:5.5). The discrimination threshold for a standard bile-acid mixture solution of the same composition ratio was 4×10⁻⁴M, meaning the uruka-derived fraction only became distinguishable as bitter at a higher concentration than the standard solution. In addition, the sweetness perceived in the standard solution was not perceived within the tested range for uruka's total bile-acid fraction.supported

Scope: A sensory test (6 assessors, using a method of rinsing the mouth with lukewarm water, then holding the sample in the mouth and expectorating it)

Note: It is also reported that bitterness intensified as purification progressed (Table 7), and the paper discusses the possibility that some other unknown component in uruka's total bile-acid fraction affects the discrimination threshold for bitterness and the expression of sweetness.

Compares, by sensory test, the discrimination thresholds of the total bile-acid fraction derived from uruka and a standard bile-acid mixture solution, reporting that the former could only be discriminated as bitter at a higher concentration.
Limitations: A small in-house panel of 6 assessors; the threshold cannot be generalized to the general population.
Source: 「うるか」の苦味成分の検索 ―とくに胆汁酸に関連して― (遠藤幸子; 綾木義和, 1982) · full text checked
Show datadish-uruka —has_bitter_recognition_threshold→ "A sensory test on the total bile-acid fraction extracted from uruka found that all 6 assessors perceived bitterness at a concentration of 8×10⁻⁴M expressed as cholic acid (with a free-form to taurine-conjugated molar ratio of 17.5:5.5). The discrimination threshold for a standard bile-acid mixture solution of the same composition ratio was 4×10⁻⁴M, meaning the uruka-derived fraction only became distinguishable as bitter at a higher concentration than the standard solution. In addition, the sweetness perceived in the standard solution was not perceived within the tested range for uruka's total bile-acid fraction."
claim: clm-uruka-bile-acid-bitterness-threshold / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-02

An honest note

Frequently asked

Why does the same bitterness feel different from person to person?

For some compounds, the difference in how people perceive them is reported to be very large. For the bitter substance PTC (phenylthiocarbamide), individual variation for the same compound has been reported to reach up to 8000-fold, which is larger than the difference in thresholds between compounds (on the order of more than 40-fold). Part of this individual variation is reported to be explainable by the genetic type of the receptor TAS2R38: 5 worldwide haplotypes formed by 3 SNPs are reported to explain 55-85% of the variation in sensitivity among unrelated subjects. However, the strength of this association differs by compound, and for PROP, another bitter substance, the split by genotype was not as clear-cut as for PTC.

Is bitterness sensitivity the same in water as in food?

It is not the same. Limonin, a citrus bitter compound, reached its threshold at 1 mg/L in distilled water, whereas in pH 3.8 orange juice the maximum discrimination threshold rose to 6.5 mg/kg. Naringin's threshold in distilled water is also 20 mg/L, but there is also a description in which an immediate bitterness arises in juice once the concentration exceeds 20 ppm. For uruka, 「うるか」 (in translation: "uruka"), a fermented ayu-entrails food, it is likewise reported that bitterness was discriminated only at a higher concentration in the fraction derived from the actual food than in the standard bile-acid solution. When the solvent or the food's composition changes, the concentration at which the same compound's bitterness is noticed changes too.

What is not known

Related:TAS2R38 /quinine /iso-α-acids (isohumulones) /sake /uruka (salted, fermented ayu entrails)
Related research notes:「苦い」 (in translation: "bitter") Is Not a Single Taste /Does any seasoning remove bitterness? — Sugar and salt /Where Hop Bitterness Comes From, and Where It Is Lost /Twenty-Five Bitter Taste Receptors: What Do They Divide Between Them?
Source ledger: Source list / Topic hub: Beer bitterness and IBU

How to cite this page

Aoki, M. (NIGAMI LAB) (2026). A Map of Bitterness Thresholds. https://nigamilab.com/en/notes/bitterness-thresholds-map/

Each claim card has a stable anchor (#clm-…). The dataset is CC BY 4.0; see the data page. Dataset DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22739101